Huan He , Yuanzhu Zhan , Baofeng Huo , Yufeng Zhang , Xiaojie Shi
{"title":"The impact of national centralized drug procurement policy on firm performance: Evidence from Chinese pharmaceutical firms","authors":"Huan He , Yuanzhu Zhan , Baofeng Huo , Yufeng Zhang , Xiaojie Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China’s national centralized drug procurement policy, as a form of group purchasing, has successfully improved drug affordability and accessibility through significant price reductions. While prior studies have examined the long-term policy effects on pharmaceutical firms, critical gaps exist in understanding the immediate financial consequences for pharmaceutical firms, and how firm characteristics, supply chain factor, and product market factor moderate the relationship. To address this gap, we leverage data from the China Stock Market and Accounting Research (CSMAR) database and the Cninfo and utilize an event study methodology to analyze the policy impact on the financial performance of 205 Chinese pharmaceutical firms in the stock market. The results show that the policy shift led to a significant decrease in firm value by −2.67% on the day of the event, equating to approximately $661 million. Moreover, firms exhibiting higher innovation or sales intensity tend to experience a more pronounced negative impact, while those with a more concentrated supply chain are less vulnerable to regulatory changes. However, the positive role of product internationalization is not significant. The post-hoc analysis reveals that both state-owned and non-state-owned firms experienced notable declines in stock values and this adverse effect has no significant difference between the two kinds of firms. Moreover, the long-term effect analysis indicates that this negative effect can last for one year in the stock market. Our findings shed light on both firm managers and policymakers in developing regulatory adaptation strategies and responding to the impact of this policy shift.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 104225"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525002662","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
China’s national centralized drug procurement policy, as a form of group purchasing, has successfully improved drug affordability and accessibility through significant price reductions. While prior studies have examined the long-term policy effects on pharmaceutical firms, critical gaps exist in understanding the immediate financial consequences for pharmaceutical firms, and how firm characteristics, supply chain factor, and product market factor moderate the relationship. To address this gap, we leverage data from the China Stock Market and Accounting Research (CSMAR) database and the Cninfo and utilize an event study methodology to analyze the policy impact on the financial performance of 205 Chinese pharmaceutical firms in the stock market. The results show that the policy shift led to a significant decrease in firm value by −2.67% on the day of the event, equating to approximately $661 million. Moreover, firms exhibiting higher innovation or sales intensity tend to experience a more pronounced negative impact, while those with a more concentrated supply chain are less vulnerable to regulatory changes. However, the positive role of product internationalization is not significant. The post-hoc analysis reveals that both state-owned and non-state-owned firms experienced notable declines in stock values and this adverse effect has no significant difference between the two kinds of firms. Moreover, the long-term effect analysis indicates that this negative effect can last for one year in the stock market. Our findings shed light on both firm managers and policymakers in developing regulatory adaptation strategies and responding to the impact of this policy shift.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management.
Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.