{"title":"A univariate iterative correction strength prediction method for composites considering residual stresses","authors":"Hengming Zhang, Mingming Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.mechrescom.2025.104444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional strength-ratio prediction method has limitations in considering residual stresses and is prone to misjudging failure modes at low mechanical stress states. To solve this problem, a univariate iterative correction strength prediction method is proposed in this paper. The method considers the residual stress as a constant value and adjusts the mechanical stress variable coefficients iteratively to update the synthetic stress state and make a failure judgment. Case validation shows that the method can accurately predict the damage modes and ultimate loads of composites independent of the mechanical stress levels. Further studies reveal that the residual stress significantly reduces the tensile strength of the laminate (up to 50.8 %) and changes the failure modes (matrix compression failure to tensile failure); the residual stress has a translational effect on the failure envelope, which alters the overall damage envelope of the laminate by translating the damage curves of each single ply. In addition, the proposed residual strength concept can simplify the stress analysis process. The research results provide theoretical support for structural design and strength assessment of composite materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49846,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics Research Communications","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 104444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093641325000771","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traditional strength-ratio prediction method has limitations in considering residual stresses and is prone to misjudging failure modes at low mechanical stress states. To solve this problem, a univariate iterative correction strength prediction method is proposed in this paper. The method considers the residual stress as a constant value and adjusts the mechanical stress variable coefficients iteratively to update the synthetic stress state and make a failure judgment. Case validation shows that the method can accurately predict the damage modes and ultimate loads of composites independent of the mechanical stress levels. Further studies reveal that the residual stress significantly reduces the tensile strength of the laminate (up to 50.8 %) and changes the failure modes (matrix compression failure to tensile failure); the residual stress has a translational effect on the failure envelope, which alters the overall damage envelope of the laminate by translating the damage curves of each single ply. In addition, the proposed residual strength concept can simplify the stress analysis process. The research results provide theoretical support for structural design and strength assessment of composite materials.
期刊介绍:
Mechanics Research Communications publishes, as rapidly as possible, peer-reviewed manuscripts of high standards but restricted length. It aims to provide:
• a fast means of communication
• an exchange of ideas among workers in mechanics
• an effective method of bringing new results quickly to the public
• an informal vehicle for the discussion
• of ideas that may still be in the formative stages
The field of Mechanics will be understood to encompass the behavior of continua, fluids, solids, particles and their mixtures. Submissions must contain a strong, novel contribution to the field of mechanics, and ideally should be focused on current issues in the field involving theoretical, experimental and/or applied research, preferably within the broad expertise encompassed by the Board of Associate Editors. Deviations from these areas should be discussed in advance with the Editor-in-Chief.