Laura Niero , Carlo Pellegrino , Vasilis Sarhosis , Paolo Zampieri
{"title":"A methodology for the rapid and reliable assessment of existing masonry arch bridges containing defects","authors":"Laura Niero , Carlo Pellegrino , Vasilis Sarhosis , Paolo Zampieri","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Masonry arch bridges remain a vital part of the road and rail infrastructure. Many of those structures have already been in service for hundreds of years and are currently showing signs of defects due to material deterioration and structural damage. This paper aims to propose a methodology to evaluate the load-bearing capacity of in-service masonry arch bridges, taking into account their existing defects. According to the method, first, defects observed in masonry arch bridges during visual inspection are categorised based on their severity level in accordance with the Italian Railway Instructions. Subsequently, the defects are incorporated into an in-house two-dimensional rigid-block limit analysis code to evaluate the load-bearing capacity of single span masonry bridges with spans ranging from 6 to 20 m. The representation of defects including the loss of bricks, loss of mortar, surface spalling were taken into consideration using a probabilistic approach through the Monte Carlo method. From the results analysis, it was shown that for bridges containing same level of defect, the loss of bearing capacity (calculated as the collapse multiplier of the damaged bridge over the collapse multiplier of the undamaged bridge) is greater for bridges with shorter spans compared to those with longer spans. Also, loss of bricks from the arch ring leads to more significant reductions in the bridge’s load-bearing capacity compared to loss of mortar joint and surface spalling. Finally, the simultaneous presence of multiple defects leads to greater losses in load-bearing capacity and variations in the collapse mechanisms of the bridge. This study offers a simplified approach for quantitatively assessing the reduction in load-bearing capacity of masonry bridges containing defects, providing valuable insights for the effective management of existing masonry bridge stock.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"339 ","pages":"Article 120528"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625009198","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Masonry arch bridges remain a vital part of the road and rail infrastructure. Many of those structures have already been in service for hundreds of years and are currently showing signs of defects due to material deterioration and structural damage. This paper aims to propose a methodology to evaluate the load-bearing capacity of in-service masonry arch bridges, taking into account their existing defects. According to the method, first, defects observed in masonry arch bridges during visual inspection are categorised based on their severity level in accordance with the Italian Railway Instructions. Subsequently, the defects are incorporated into an in-house two-dimensional rigid-block limit analysis code to evaluate the load-bearing capacity of single span masonry bridges with spans ranging from 6 to 20 m. The representation of defects including the loss of bricks, loss of mortar, surface spalling were taken into consideration using a probabilistic approach through the Monte Carlo method. From the results analysis, it was shown that for bridges containing same level of defect, the loss of bearing capacity (calculated as the collapse multiplier of the damaged bridge over the collapse multiplier of the undamaged bridge) is greater for bridges with shorter spans compared to those with longer spans. Also, loss of bricks from the arch ring leads to more significant reductions in the bridge’s load-bearing capacity compared to loss of mortar joint and surface spalling. Finally, the simultaneous presence of multiple defects leads to greater losses in load-bearing capacity and variations in the collapse mechanisms of the bridge. This study offers a simplified approach for quantitatively assessing the reduction in load-bearing capacity of masonry bridges containing defects, providing valuable insights for the effective management of existing masonry bridge stock.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.