Adolescent vaccine introductions scoping review: A decade of insights from low- and middle-income countries (2013−2023)

IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Arman Majidulla , Amelia K. Gerste , Anurima Baidya , Onimitein Georgewill , Kirthini K. Muralidharan , Degu J. Dare , Joeri S. Buis , Michelle M. Gill , Julie A. Denison , Andrew D. Kerkhoff , Rupali J. Limaye
{"title":"Adolescent vaccine introductions scoping review: A decade of insights from low- and middle-income countries (2013−2023)","authors":"Arman Majidulla ,&nbsp;Amelia K. Gerste ,&nbsp;Anurima Baidya ,&nbsp;Onimitein Georgewill ,&nbsp;Kirthini K. Muralidharan ,&nbsp;Degu J. Dare ,&nbsp;Joeri S. Buis ,&nbsp;Michelle M. Gill ,&nbsp;Julie A. Denison ,&nbsp;Andrew D. Kerkhoff ,&nbsp;Rupali J. Limaye","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Adolescents benefit from vaccines before infection – such as HPV – but parental consent and frequent social interactions complicate their introductions. We conducted a scoping review of the literature (2013 to 2023) on adolescent vaccine introduction efforts in low- and middle-income countries to examine lessons learned.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Following the PRISMA guideline, we searched four databases, screened abstracts and reviewed full text articles for inclusion. We included English full text articles which provided insights based on primary data collection into vaccine introductions for adolescents over the past ten years (i.e., 2013 onwards). We further searched the citations of included articles. We coded included articles for key characteristics and analyzed for thematic commonalities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-six studies met our inclusion criteria, and the findings clustered across three distinct phases of new vaccine introduction: planning, implementation/delivery, and post-implementation/delivery. During the planning phase, the early engagement of stakeholders – particularly ministries of health and education - was critical for coordination and readiness. During implementation, school-based delivery was the most common approach, often supplemented by community outreach and mop-up activities to reach out-of-school adolescents. Opt-out consent was used as a strategy in some contexts in keeping with existing adolescent vaccine protocols. Vaccine rumors and conspiracy needed to be actively managed in some contexts. Post-introduction, health systems impacts were generally minimal and temporary, although human resource constraints and cold-chain gaps emerged in some settings. Several countries reported positive spillover effects, such as strengthened collaboration between health and education sectors, expanded adolescent health promotion, and investments in vaccine infrastructure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Adolescent vaccine introductions required multisectoral collaboration, flexible delivery models, and proactive community engagement. Future vaccine introductions would benefit from early stakeholder coordination and attention to context-specific delivery and consent strategies to ensure that vaccines are accepted, accessible, and equitably delivered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100657"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136225000518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Adolescents benefit from vaccines before infection – such as HPV – but parental consent and frequent social interactions complicate their introductions. We conducted a scoping review of the literature (2013 to 2023) on adolescent vaccine introduction efforts in low- and middle-income countries to examine lessons learned.

Method

Following the PRISMA guideline, we searched four databases, screened abstracts and reviewed full text articles for inclusion. We included English full text articles which provided insights based on primary data collection into vaccine introductions for adolescents over the past ten years (i.e., 2013 onwards). We further searched the citations of included articles. We coded included articles for key characteristics and analyzed for thematic commonalities.

Results

Twenty-six studies met our inclusion criteria, and the findings clustered across three distinct phases of new vaccine introduction: planning, implementation/delivery, and post-implementation/delivery. During the planning phase, the early engagement of stakeholders – particularly ministries of health and education - was critical for coordination and readiness. During implementation, school-based delivery was the most common approach, often supplemented by community outreach and mop-up activities to reach out-of-school adolescents. Opt-out consent was used as a strategy in some contexts in keeping with existing adolescent vaccine protocols. Vaccine rumors and conspiracy needed to be actively managed in some contexts. Post-introduction, health systems impacts were generally minimal and temporary, although human resource constraints and cold-chain gaps emerged in some settings. Several countries reported positive spillover effects, such as strengthened collaboration between health and education sectors, expanded adolescent health promotion, and investments in vaccine infrastructure.

Conclusion

Adolescent vaccine introductions required multisectoral collaboration, flexible delivery models, and proactive community engagement. Future vaccine introductions would benefit from early stakeholder coordination and attention to context-specific delivery and consent strategies to ensure that vaccines are accepted, accessible, and equitably delivered.
青少年疫苗引进范围审查:低收入和中等收入国家十年的见解(2013 - 2023年)
青少年在感染HPV等病毒之前就可以接种疫苗,但父母的同意和频繁的社会交往使疫苗接种变得复杂。我们对低收入和中等收入国家青少年接种疫苗工作的文献(2013年至2023年)进行了范围审查,以审查吸取的经验教训。方法按照PRISMA指南检索4个数据库,筛选摘要,并对全文文章进行检索。我们纳入了英文全文文章,这些文章提供了基于过去十年(即2013年以后)对青少年接种疫苗的初步数据收集的见解。我们进一步检索了收录文章的引文。我们对文章的关键特征进行编码,并对主题共性进行分析。结果26项研究符合我们的纳入标准,研究结果集中在新疫苗引入的三个不同阶段:计划、实施/交付和实施后/交付。在规划阶段,利益攸关方————特别是卫生部和教育部————的早期参与对协调和准备工作至关重要。在实施过程中,以学校为基础是最常见的方法,通常辅以社区外展和扫荡活动,以接触到失学青少年。在某些情况下,选择退出同意被用作一种战略,以与现有的青少年疫苗协议保持一致。在某些情况下,需要积极管理疫苗谣言和阴谋。虽然在某些情况下出现了人力资源限制和冷链缺口,但在引进后,卫生系统的影响通常很小,而且是暂时的。若干国家报告了积极的溢出效应,例如加强了卫生和教育部门之间的合作,扩大了青少年健康宣传,以及投资于疫苗基础设施。结论:青少年疫苗推广需要多部门合作、灵活的交付模式和积极的社区参与。未来的疫苗引进将受益于利益攸关方的早期协调和对具体情况的交付和同意战略的关注,以确保疫苗被接受、可获得和公平交付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信