Improved performance indicators and institutional setup for more viable compost production from municipal solid waste in Sri Lanka

A. Manipura , P. Drechsel , H.M.L.C. Jayawardhana , R. Shanmugapriya , N.R. Mannapperuma , H.S.I. Jayatilleke
{"title":"Improved performance indicators and institutional setup for more viable compost production from municipal solid waste in Sri Lanka","authors":"A. Manipura ,&nbsp;P. Drechsel ,&nbsp;H.M.L.C. Jayawardhana ,&nbsp;R. Shanmugapriya ,&nbsp;N.R. Mannapperuma ,&nbsp;H.S.I. Jayatilleke","doi":"10.1016/j.wmb.2025.100217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Managing municipal solid waste (MSW) is challenging for most local authorities (LAs), especially in urban and <em>peri</em>-urban areas due to increasing waste quantities and decreasing options for safe disposal. Many LAs around the world prefer composting organic waste as a means of waste volume (and transport cost) reduction and cost recovery option within a circular economy framework. To optimize compost production with a focus on cost recovery, a systematic study was conducted at 22 composting stations located in Sri Lanka’s highly populated Western Province. The study examined process management from organic waste collection to product quality and cost recovery via compost sales. Collected organic waste conversion into compost was varied between 1 % and 15 % and time taken for completion of the process varied between 2.5 – 4.5 months. No standard operating procedure was observed though input organic matter was of similar nature. Excess leachate and odour production reported by 59 % of the surveyed stations. Complete analysis of compost quality was hardly reported by any LAs and no sales and marketing strategies were adopted to boost the cost recovery. Poor data management has hindered the identification of improvement opportunities and performance benchmarking of composting stations run by LAs. To address these significant performance variations observed among the stations, a monitoring and evaluation framework is proposed based on four composite key performance indicators (KPIs): General Facility Management Index (GFMI), Composting Process Management Index (CPMI), Compost Quality Index (CQI), and Cost Recovery Index (CRI). These KPIs serve to benchmark performance and identify incremental improvement opportunities at each station. However, to address institutional and human capacity challenges an institutional partnership model is also proposed, which could incentivize the implementation and achievements of the KPIs while reducing the pressure on LAs to reach the compost market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101276,"journal":{"name":"Waste Management Bulletin","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Management Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294975072500046X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing municipal solid waste (MSW) is challenging for most local authorities (LAs), especially in urban and peri-urban areas due to increasing waste quantities and decreasing options for safe disposal. Many LAs around the world prefer composting organic waste as a means of waste volume (and transport cost) reduction and cost recovery option within a circular economy framework. To optimize compost production with a focus on cost recovery, a systematic study was conducted at 22 composting stations located in Sri Lanka’s highly populated Western Province. The study examined process management from organic waste collection to product quality and cost recovery via compost sales. Collected organic waste conversion into compost was varied between 1 % and 15 % and time taken for completion of the process varied between 2.5 – 4.5 months. No standard operating procedure was observed though input organic matter was of similar nature. Excess leachate and odour production reported by 59 % of the surveyed stations. Complete analysis of compost quality was hardly reported by any LAs and no sales and marketing strategies were adopted to boost the cost recovery. Poor data management has hindered the identification of improvement opportunities and performance benchmarking of composting stations run by LAs. To address these significant performance variations observed among the stations, a monitoring and evaluation framework is proposed based on four composite key performance indicators (KPIs): General Facility Management Index (GFMI), Composting Process Management Index (CPMI), Compost Quality Index (CQI), and Cost Recovery Index (CRI). These KPIs serve to benchmark performance and identify incremental improvement opportunities at each station. However, to address institutional and human capacity challenges an institutional partnership model is also proposed, which could incentivize the implementation and achievements of the KPIs while reducing the pressure on LAs to reach the compost market.
改善斯里兰卡的绩效指标和机构设置,以便从城市固体废物中生产更可行的堆肥
对于大多数地方当局来说,管理城市固体废物是一项挑战,特别是在城市和城郊地区,因为废物数量不断增加,而安全处置的选择却越来越少。在循环经济框架内,世界上许多国家更喜欢将有机废物堆肥作为减少废物量(和运输成本)和回收成本的一种方法。为了优化堆肥生产并注重成本回收,在斯里兰卡人口稠密的西部省的22个堆肥站进行了系统研究。该研究考察了从有机废物收集到产品质量和通过堆肥销售回收成本的过程管理。收集的有机废物转化为堆肥的比例在1%至15%之间,完成该过程所需的时间在2.5至4.5个月之间。虽然输入的有机物具有相似的性质,但没有观察到标准的操作程序。59%被调查的污水站报告产生过量的渗滤液和气味。堆肥质量的完整分析几乎没有任何LAs报告,也没有采取任何销售和营销策略来提高成本回收。数据管理不善,妨碍了确定由农业联盟管理的堆肥站的改进机会和绩效基准。为了解决这些显著的绩效差异,提出了一个基于综合设施管理指数(GFMI)、堆肥过程管理指数(CPMI)、堆肥质量指数(CQI)和成本回收指数(CRI)四个综合关键绩效指标(kpi)的监测和评估框架。这些kpi用于对性能进行基准测试,并确定每个站点的增量改进机会。然而,为了解决制度和人力能力方面的挑战,还提出了一种制度伙伴关系模式,该模式可以激励kpi的实施和成就,同时减少农业部门进入堆肥市场的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信