Stephanie Coronado-Montoya , Amal Abdel-Baki , Paule Bodson-Clermont , David Boucher-Roy , José Côté , Candice E. Crocker , David Crockford , Jean-Gabriel Daneault , Simon Dubreucq , Maxime Dussault-Laurendeau , Benedikt Fischer , Pamela Lachance-Touchette , Tania Lecomte , Sophie L’Heureux , Clairélaine Ouellet-Plamondon , Marc-André Roy , Ovidiu Tatar , Philip G Tibbo , Marie Villeneuve , Anne Wittevrongel , Didier Jutras-Aswad
{"title":"A pilot randomized controlled trial of a digital cannabis harm reduction intervention for young adults with first-episode psychosis who use cannabis","authors":"Stephanie Coronado-Montoya , Amal Abdel-Baki , Paule Bodson-Clermont , David Boucher-Roy , José Côté , Candice E. Crocker , David Crockford , Jean-Gabriel Daneault , Simon Dubreucq , Maxime Dussault-Laurendeau , Benedikt Fischer , Pamela Lachance-Touchette , Tania Lecomte , Sophie L’Heureux , Clairélaine Ouellet-Plamondon , Marc-André Roy , Ovidiu Tatar , Philip G Tibbo , Marie Villeneuve , Anne Wittevrongel , Didier Jutras-Aswad","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cannabis use is widespread and associated with worsened prognosis for young adults with first-episode psychosis (FEP). Few cannabis harm reduction interventions have been evaluated for this population, despite potential to improve outcomes in those not ready for cannabis abstinence/reduction-focused interventions. This study aimed to determine a) the acceptability of a digital harm reduction intervention, the Cannabis Harm-reducing App to Manage Practices Safely (CHAMPS) and b) the feasibility of conducting a trial comparing FEP-specialized early intervention services (EIS)+CHAMPS versus EIS-only with this population. We conducted a multi-site pilot randomized controlled trial comparing both arms in 101 young adults (18 - 35 years old) with FEP using cannabis and attending EIS. Primary outcomes were trial retention rate (i.e., proportion of randomized participants retained at week 6; trial feasibility assessment) and CHAMPS completion rate (i.e., proportion of intervention participants completing four of six modules; CHAMPS acceptability assessment). Trial retention rate above 60 % indicated feasibility and completion rate above 50 % indicated acceptability. Additional outcomes included harm reduction strategy use, motivation to change cannabis behaviors, cannabis-related problems, cannabis use, psychotic symptoms and dependence severity, assessed at baseline, weeks 6, 12 and 18. Trial retention was 82.2 % and completion rate was 58.8 %, suggesting trial feasibility and CHAMPS acceptability. Signals of possible improvement in the intervention group were observed regarding harm reduction strategy use, motivation to change behaviors, cannabis-related problems and cannabis use frequency. This study supports conducting an efficacy trial assessing the potential of CHAMPS in improving outcomes for young adults with psychosis using cannabis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"350 ","pages":"Article 116553"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517812500201X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cannabis use is widespread and associated with worsened prognosis for young adults with first-episode psychosis (FEP). Few cannabis harm reduction interventions have been evaluated for this population, despite potential to improve outcomes in those not ready for cannabis abstinence/reduction-focused interventions. This study aimed to determine a) the acceptability of a digital harm reduction intervention, the Cannabis Harm-reducing App to Manage Practices Safely (CHAMPS) and b) the feasibility of conducting a trial comparing FEP-specialized early intervention services (EIS)+CHAMPS versus EIS-only with this population. We conducted a multi-site pilot randomized controlled trial comparing both arms in 101 young adults (18 - 35 years old) with FEP using cannabis and attending EIS. Primary outcomes were trial retention rate (i.e., proportion of randomized participants retained at week 6; trial feasibility assessment) and CHAMPS completion rate (i.e., proportion of intervention participants completing four of six modules; CHAMPS acceptability assessment). Trial retention rate above 60 % indicated feasibility and completion rate above 50 % indicated acceptability. Additional outcomes included harm reduction strategy use, motivation to change cannabis behaviors, cannabis-related problems, cannabis use, psychotic symptoms and dependence severity, assessed at baseline, weeks 6, 12 and 18. Trial retention was 82.2 % and completion rate was 58.8 %, suggesting trial feasibility and CHAMPS acceptability. Signals of possible improvement in the intervention group were observed regarding harm reduction strategy use, motivation to change behaviors, cannabis-related problems and cannabis use frequency. This study supports conducting an efficacy trial assessing the potential of CHAMPS in improving outcomes for young adults with psychosis using cannabis.
期刊介绍:
Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry.
The scope of the journal encompasses:
Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders.
Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders.
Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases.
Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments.
Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders.
Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.