Bruis van Vlijmen, Vivek N. Lam, Patrick A. Asinger, Xiao Cui, Joachim Schaeffer, Alexis Geslin, Devi Ganapathi, Shijing Sun, Patrick K. Herring, Chirranjeevi Balaji Gopal, Natalie Geise, Haitao D. Deng, Henry L. Thaman, Stephen Dongmin Kang, Steven B. Torrisi, Amalie Trewartha, Abraham Anapolsky, Brian D. Storey, William E. Gent, Richard D. Braatz, William C. Chueh
{"title":"Aging matrix visualizes complexity of battery aging across hundreds of cycling protocols","authors":"Bruis van Vlijmen, Vivek N. Lam, Patrick A. Asinger, Xiao Cui, Joachim Schaeffer, Alexis Geslin, Devi Ganapathi, Shijing Sun, Patrick K. Herring, Chirranjeevi Balaji Gopal, Natalie Geise, Haitao D. Deng, Henry L. Thaman, Stephen Dongmin Kang, Steven B. Torrisi, Amalie Trewartha, Abraham Anapolsky, Brian D. Storey, William E. Gent, Richard D. Braatz, William C. Chueh","doi":"10.1039/d4ee05609d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To reliably deploy lithium-ion batteries, a fundamental understanding of cycling aging behavior is critical. Battery aging consists of complex and highly coupled phenomena, making it challenging to develop a holistic interpretation. In this work, we generate a diverse battery cycling dataset with a broad range of degradation trajectories, consisting of 359 high energy density commercial Li(Ni,Co,Al)O<small><sub>2</sub></small>/graphite + SiO<small><sub><em>x</em></sub></small> cylindrical 21 700 cells cycled across 207 unique cycling protocols. We consolidate aging <em>via</em> 16 mechanistic state-of-health (SOH) metrics, including cell-level performance metrics, electrode-specific capacities/state-of-charges (SOCs), and aging trajectory metrics. We develop a framework using interpretable machine learning and explainable features to generate an aging matrix that visually deconvolutes the complex battery degradation behavior. This generalizable data-driven mechanistic framework simplifies the complex interplay between cycling conditions, degradation modes, and SOH, acting as a hypothesis-generation tool to aid battery users in identifying key degradation regimes for further study and experimentation.","PeriodicalId":72,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environmental Science","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":32.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ee05609d","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To reliably deploy lithium-ion batteries, a fundamental understanding of cycling aging behavior is critical. Battery aging consists of complex and highly coupled phenomena, making it challenging to develop a holistic interpretation. In this work, we generate a diverse battery cycling dataset with a broad range of degradation trajectories, consisting of 359 high energy density commercial Li(Ni,Co,Al)O2/graphite + SiOx cylindrical 21 700 cells cycled across 207 unique cycling protocols. We consolidate aging via 16 mechanistic state-of-health (SOH) metrics, including cell-level performance metrics, electrode-specific capacities/state-of-charges (SOCs), and aging trajectory metrics. We develop a framework using interpretable machine learning and explainable features to generate an aging matrix that visually deconvolutes the complex battery degradation behavior. This generalizable data-driven mechanistic framework simplifies the complex interplay between cycling conditions, degradation modes, and SOH, acting as a hypothesis-generation tool to aid battery users in identifying key degradation regimes for further study and experimentation.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environmental Science, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, publishes original research and review articles covering interdisciplinary topics in the (bio)chemical and (bio)physical sciences, as well as chemical engineering disciplines. Published monthly by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), a not-for-profit publisher, Energy & Environmental Science is recognized as a leading journal. It boasts an impressive impact factor of 8.500 as of 2009, ranking 8th among 140 journals in the category "Chemistry, Multidisciplinary," second among 71 journals in "Energy & Fuels," second among 128 journals in "Engineering, Chemical," and first among 181 scientific journals in "Environmental Sciences."
Energy & Environmental Science publishes various types of articles, including Research Papers (original scientific work), Review Articles, Perspectives, and Minireviews (feature review-type articles of broad interest), Communications (original scientific work of an urgent nature), Opinions (personal, often speculative viewpoints or hypotheses on current topics), and Analysis Articles (in-depth examination of energy-related issues).