Improving the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home: a cluster randomised controlled trial of an intervention to involve older people in their care (Your Care Needs You)

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Jenni Murray, Kalpita Baird, Stephen Brealey, Laura Mandefield, Gerry Richardson, Jane O'Hara, Robbie Foy, Laura Sheard, Alison Cracknell, Alfredo Palacios, Simon Walker, Ed Breckin, Lubena Mirza, Ruth Baxter, Catherine Hewitt, Rebecca Lawton
{"title":"Improving the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home: a cluster randomised controlled trial of an intervention to involve older people in their care (Your Care Needs You)","authors":"Jenni Murray, Kalpita Baird, Stephen Brealey, Laura Mandefield, Gerry Richardson, Jane O'Hara, Robbie Foy, Laura Sheard, Alison Cracknell, Alfredo Palacios, Simon Walker, Ed Breckin, Lubena Mirza, Ruth Baxter, Catherine Hewitt, Rebecca Lawton","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Transitions from hospital to home are risky for older people. The role of patient involvement in supporting safe transitions is unclear. Objective To assess the clinical effectiveness of an intervention to improve the safety and experience of care transitions for older people. Trial design Cluster randomised controlled trial. Participants Eleven National Health Service acute hospital trusts and 42 wards (clusters) routinely providing care for older people (aged 75 years and older) planning to transition back home. Intervention Patient involvement ward-level intervention—Your Care Needs You (YCNY). Outcomes Unplanned hospital readmission rates within 30 days of discharge (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included readmissions at 60 and 90 days post-discharge, experience of transitions and safety events. Randomisation Ward as the unit of randomisation from varying medical specialities randomised to YCNY or care-as-usual on a 1:1 basis. Blinding Ward staff, research nurses and researchers were unblinded. Patients were unaware of treatment allocation. Statisticians were blinded to the primary outcome data until statistical analysis plan sign-off. Results Using a mixed effects logistic regression we saw no significant difference in unplanned 30-day readmission rates (OR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.10; P = .372) between intervention (17%) and control (19%). At all timepoints, rates were lower in the intervention group. The total number of readmissions was lower in the intervention group (all timepoints) reaching statistical significance across 90-days with 13% fewer readmissions (IRR: 0.87; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.99) than the control. At 30-days only, intervention group patients reported better experiences of transitions and significantly fewer safety events. Serious adverse events were similarly observed in both groups [YCNY: 26 (52.0%), Care-as-usual: 24 (48.0%)]. None related to treatment. Conclusions YCNY did not significantly impact on unplanned hospital readmissions at 30 days but in some secondary outcomes we did find evidence of clinical benefit.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Transitions from hospital to home are risky for older people. The role of patient involvement in supporting safe transitions is unclear. Objective To assess the clinical effectiveness of an intervention to improve the safety and experience of care transitions for older people. Trial design Cluster randomised controlled trial. Participants Eleven National Health Service acute hospital trusts and 42 wards (clusters) routinely providing care for older people (aged 75 years and older) planning to transition back home. Intervention Patient involvement ward-level intervention—Your Care Needs You (YCNY). Outcomes Unplanned hospital readmission rates within 30 days of discharge (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included readmissions at 60 and 90 days post-discharge, experience of transitions and safety events. Randomisation Ward as the unit of randomisation from varying medical specialities randomised to YCNY or care-as-usual on a 1:1 basis. Blinding Ward staff, research nurses and researchers were unblinded. Patients were unaware of treatment allocation. Statisticians were blinded to the primary outcome data until statistical analysis plan sign-off. Results Using a mixed effects logistic regression we saw no significant difference in unplanned 30-day readmission rates (OR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.10; P = .372) between intervention (17%) and control (19%). At all timepoints, rates were lower in the intervention group. The total number of readmissions was lower in the intervention group (all timepoints) reaching statistical significance across 90-days with 13% fewer readmissions (IRR: 0.87; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.99) than the control. At 30-days only, intervention group patients reported better experiences of transitions and significantly fewer safety events. Serious adverse events were similarly observed in both groups [YCNY: 26 (52.0%), Care-as-usual: 24 (48.0%)]. None related to treatment. Conclusions YCNY did not significantly impact on unplanned hospital readmissions at 30 days but in some secondary outcomes we did find evidence of clinical benefit.
改善从医院到家庭过渡的安全性和体验:一项让老年人参与其护理的干预措施的集群随机对照试验(你的护理需要你)
从医院到家庭的过渡对老年人来说是有风险的。患者参与在支持安全过渡中的作用尚不清楚。目的评价一项干预措施的临床效果,以提高老年人护理过渡的安全性和体验。试验设计:聚类随机对照试验。11个国家卫生服务急性医院信托基金和42个病房(集群)常规为计划过渡回家的老年人(75岁及以上)提供护理。患者参与病房级干预——你的护理需要你(YCNY)。出院后30天内的意外再入院率(主要结局)。次要结局包括出院后60天和90天的再入院、过渡经历和安全事件。随机化病房作为随机化的单位,从不同的医学专业随机到人民币或按1:1的基础照护。盲眼病房的工作人员、研究护士和研究人员被解除了盲眼。患者不知道治疗分配。在统计分析计划签署之前,统计学家对主要结果数据不知情。使用混合效应逻辑回归,我们发现计划外30天再入院率无显著差异(OR 0.93;95% CI, 0.78 ~ 1.10;P = .372),干预组(17%)与对照组(19%)之间存在差异。在所有时间点,干预组的发病率都较低。干预组(所有时间点)90天内再入院总人数较低,再入院人数减少13% (IRR: 0.87;95% CI 0.76 ~ 0.99)。仅在30天,干预组患者报告了更好的过渡体验和显著减少的安全事件。两组患者的严重不良事件相似[YCNY: 26例(52.0%),照护:24例(48.0%)]。与治疗无关。结论:YCNY对30天的非计划住院再入院没有显著影响,但在一些次要结局中,我们确实发现了临床获益的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信