One-Year Outcomes Predict 10-Year Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement

Emily Berzolla, Katherine L. Esser, Griffith G. Gosnell, Nathaniel Mercer, Daniel J. Kaplan, Thomas Youm
{"title":"One-Year Outcomes Predict 10-Year Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement","authors":"Emily Berzolla, Katherine L. Esser, Griffith G. Gosnell, Nathaniel Mercer, Daniel J. Kaplan, Thomas Youm","doi":"10.1177/03635465251342119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: While both short- and long-term outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) have been reported, the predictive relationship between the two has yet to be established. Purpose: To determine whether the degree of improvement in patient-reported outcomes observed at 1 year postoperatively predicts long-term outcomes at 10 years after primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3 Methods: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS by a single surgeon at a single institution with 10-year follow-up were identified. Outcomes were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) at baseline and 1, 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. Patients were classified as either high improvement (HI) or low improvement (LI) based on if they achieved the median 1-year change in mHHS from baseline. Chart review was performed to collect surgical details such as operative procedures, complications, and revision surgery. Outcomes were compared between groups over time using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Failure rates were determined using Kaplan-Meier and Mantel-Cox log-rank analyses. Results: A total of 129 patients with a mean age of 41.0 ± 13.5 years and mean body mass index of 25.0 ± 4.3 kg/m <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> were included. Both the HI and LI groups demonstrated significant improvement in mHHS and NAHS from baseline at all follow-up time points ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; .001). The HI group had significantly higher outcome scores at all time points up to 10 years after arthroscopy compared with the LI group ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .018). Additionally, a greater proportion of patients in the HI group achieved the Patient Acceptable Symptom State and minimal clinically important difference compared with the LI group at the 10-year follow-up ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .018). Rates of overall complications, revision arthroscopy, and conversion to total hip arthroscopy were significantly higher in the LI group ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .013, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .009, and <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .004, respectively). The mean hip survival time after the index operation was shorter for the LI group (11.9 ± 0.5 years) than for the HI group (13.2 ± 0.2 years) ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .002). Conclusion: Patients who experienced greater improvement in the first year after hip arthroscopy had superior 10-year outcome scores, fewer complications, and lower rates of reoperation compared with those who experienced minimal improvement in the same period.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251342119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While both short- and long-term outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) have been reported, the predictive relationship between the two has yet to be established. Purpose: To determine whether the degree of improvement in patient-reported outcomes observed at 1 year postoperatively predicts long-term outcomes at 10 years after primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3 Methods: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS by a single surgeon at a single institution with 10-year follow-up were identified. Outcomes were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) at baseline and 1, 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. Patients were classified as either high improvement (HI) or low improvement (LI) based on if they achieved the median 1-year change in mHHS from baseline. Chart review was performed to collect surgical details such as operative procedures, complications, and revision surgery. Outcomes were compared between groups over time using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Failure rates were determined using Kaplan-Meier and Mantel-Cox log-rank analyses. Results: A total of 129 patients with a mean age of 41.0 ± 13.5 years and mean body mass index of 25.0 ± 4.3 kg/m 2 were included. Both the HI and LI groups demonstrated significant improvement in mHHS and NAHS from baseline at all follow-up time points ( P < .001). The HI group had significantly higher outcome scores at all time points up to 10 years after arthroscopy compared with the LI group ( P = .018). Additionally, a greater proportion of patients in the HI group achieved the Patient Acceptable Symptom State and minimal clinically important difference compared with the LI group at the 10-year follow-up ( P = .018). Rates of overall complications, revision arthroscopy, and conversion to total hip arthroscopy were significantly higher in the LI group ( P = .013, P = .009, and P = .004, respectively). The mean hip survival time after the index operation was shorter for the LI group (11.9 ± 0.5 years) than for the HI group (13.2 ± 0.2 years) ( P = .002). Conclusion: Patients who experienced greater improvement in the first year after hip arthroscopy had superior 10-year outcome scores, fewer complications, and lower rates of reoperation compared with those who experienced minimal improvement in the same period.
髋关节镜治疗股髋臼撞击患者1年预后预测10年预后
背景:虽然已报道了股骨髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)髋关节镜术后的短期和长期预后,但两者之间的预测关系尚未建立。目的:确定术后1年患者报告预后的改善程度是否能预测FAIS患者在初次髋关节镜检查后10年的长期预后。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3方法:在单一机构由单一外科医生接受FAIS原发性髋关节镜检查的患者,随访10年。采用改良的Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)和非关节炎髋关节评分(NAHS)在基线和术后1年、2年、5年和10年评估结果。根据患者从基线开始的1年mHHS中位数变化是否达到,将患者分为高改善(HI)或低改善(LI)。进行图表回顾以收集手术细节,如手术过程、并发症和翻修手术。使用重复测量方差分析比较各组间随时间的结果。故障率采用Kaplan-Meier和Mantel-Cox log-rank分析确定。结果:共纳入129例患者,平均年龄41.0±13.5岁,平均体重指数25.0±4.3 kg/ m2。在所有随访时间点,HI组和LI组的mHHS和NAHS均较基线有显著改善(P <;措施)。与LI组相比,HI组在关节镜术后10年的所有时间点的预后评分均显著高于LI组(P = 0.018)。此外,在10年随访中,HI组患者达到患者可接受症状状态的比例更高,与LI组相比,临床重要差异最小(P = 0.018)。LI组的总并发症、关节镜翻修和转全髋关节镜发生率均显著高于对照组(P = 0.013、P = 0.009和P = 0.004)。LI组术后平均髋关节生存时间(11.9±0.5年)短于HI组(13.2±0.2年)(P = 0.002)。结论:与同期改善最小的患者相比,在髋关节镜术后第一年有较大改善的患者具有更好的10年预后评分,更少的并发症和更低的再手术率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信