Jake Probert, David Dodwell, John Broggio, Robert Coleman, Helen Marshall, Sarah C Darby, Gurdeep S Mannu
{"title":"Identification of recurrences in women diagnosed with early invasive breast cancer using routinely collected data in England.","authors":"Jake Probert, David Dodwell, John Broggio, Robert Coleman, Helen Marshall, Sarah C Darby, Gurdeep S Mannu","doi":"10.1038/s44276-025-00154-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is the commonest cancer in the UK, with around 55,000 women diagnosed annually. Information is routinely available on breast cancer mortality but not on recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a database compiled by the West Midlands Cancer Intelligence Unit during 1997-2011 to develop and train a deterministic algorithm to identify recurrences in routinely collected data (RCD) available within NHS England. We trained the algorithm further using 150 women with stage II-III breast cancer who were recruited into the AZURE trial during 2003-2006 and invited to approximately 24 clinic follow-up visits over ten years. We then evaluated its performance using data for the remaining 1930 women in England in the AZURE trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of the RCD to detect distant recurrences recorded in the AZURE trial during the ten years following randomisation was 95.6% and its sensitivity to detect any recurrence was 96.6%. The corresponding specificities were 91.9% for distant recurrence and 77.7% for any recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate the potential of routinely collected data to identify breast cancer recurrences in England. The algorithm may have a role in several settings and make long-term follow-up in randomised trials of breast cancer treatments more cost-effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":519964,"journal":{"name":"BJC reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJC reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44276-025-00154-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is the commonest cancer in the UK, with around 55,000 women diagnosed annually. Information is routinely available on breast cancer mortality but not on recurrence.
Methods: We used a database compiled by the West Midlands Cancer Intelligence Unit during 1997-2011 to develop and train a deterministic algorithm to identify recurrences in routinely collected data (RCD) available within NHS England. We trained the algorithm further using 150 women with stage II-III breast cancer who were recruited into the AZURE trial during 2003-2006 and invited to approximately 24 clinic follow-up visits over ten years. We then evaluated its performance using data for the remaining 1930 women in England in the AZURE trial.
Results: The sensitivity of the RCD to detect distant recurrences recorded in the AZURE trial during the ten years following randomisation was 95.6% and its sensitivity to detect any recurrence was 96.6%. The corresponding specificities were 91.9% for distant recurrence and 77.7% for any recurrence.
Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the potential of routinely collected data to identify breast cancer recurrences in England. The algorithm may have a role in several settings and make long-term follow-up in randomised trials of breast cancer treatments more cost-effective.