Mackenzie S Kagan, David Zurakowski, Emi Takahashi, Russell W Jennings, Dusica Bajic
{"title":"Novel Mammillary Body Manual Segmentation: Application for Quantitative MRI Analysis of Critically Ill Infants.","authors":"Mackenzie S Kagan, David Zurakowski, Emi Takahashi, Russell W Jennings, Dusica Bajic","doi":"10.1002/neo2.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Previous qualitative studies have shown that mammillary body (MB) assessment can serve as an early marker of poor long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. This study aims to establish a reliable quantitative method for analyzing the surface area, volume, and signal intensity of MB in infancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A novel methodology was retrospectively tested in a cohort of critically ill preterm and term-born patients following <i>long-gap</i> esophageal atresia (EA) repair, and healthy term-born controls (<i>n</i> = 13/group) using non-sedated brain MRI on a 3T Siemens scanner. Manual bilateral MB segmentation of T2-weighted data and quantification of MB surface area, volume, and tissue mean signal intensity were performed using ITK-SNAP. Endpoint measures were assessed for normality, and their relationship with group status was evaluated using a general linear model with age at scan as a covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High <i>intra</i>- and <i>inter</i>-tracer reliability was observed between a novice and neuroanatomical expert for MB segmentation. Despite straightforward manual masking and novel quantification of infant MB, no significant differences were found among the three groups (preterm and term-born patients, and term-born controls) for any of the MB endpoints analyzed: surface area, volume, and signal intensity. The data analysis revealed a trend of lower values in patient groups for signal intensity only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel study describes efficient and accurate MB masking and quantification, supporting MB as a potential early marker. However, the negative results presented in infants born with <i>long-gap</i> EA should not be generalized until future prospective studies with larger sample sizes are conducted and linked to neurodevelopmental outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520854,"journal":{"name":"Clinical neuroimaging (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical neuroimaging (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/neo2.70011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: Previous qualitative studies have shown that mammillary body (MB) assessment can serve as an early marker of poor long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. This study aims to establish a reliable quantitative method for analyzing the surface area, volume, and signal intensity of MB in infancy.
Methods: A novel methodology was retrospectively tested in a cohort of critically ill preterm and term-born patients following long-gap esophageal atresia (EA) repair, and healthy term-born controls (n = 13/group) using non-sedated brain MRI on a 3T Siemens scanner. Manual bilateral MB segmentation of T2-weighted data and quantification of MB surface area, volume, and tissue mean signal intensity were performed using ITK-SNAP. Endpoint measures were assessed for normality, and their relationship with group status was evaluated using a general linear model with age at scan as a covariate.
Results: High intra- and inter-tracer reliability was observed between a novice and neuroanatomical expert for MB segmentation. Despite straightforward manual masking and novel quantification of infant MB, no significant differences were found among the three groups (preterm and term-born patients, and term-born controls) for any of the MB endpoints analyzed: surface area, volume, and signal intensity. The data analysis revealed a trend of lower values in patient groups for signal intensity only.
Conclusions: This novel study describes efficient and accurate MB masking and quantification, supporting MB as a potential early marker. However, the negative results presented in infants born with long-gap EA should not be generalized until future prospective studies with larger sample sizes are conducted and linked to neurodevelopmental outcomes.