Endoscopic ossiculoplasty: audiological and surgical outcomes from a multicenter experience with 292 cases.

Raffael Fink, Giulia Molinari, Arianna Burato, Daniel Stricker, Nicola Bisi, Daniele Marchioni, Livio Presutti, Ignacio Javier Fernandez, Lukas Anschuetz
{"title":"Endoscopic ossiculoplasty: audiological and surgical outcomes from a multicenter experience with 292 cases.","authors":"Raffael Fink, Giulia Molinari, Arianna Burato, Daniel Stricker, Nicola Bisi, Daniele Marchioni, Livio Presutti, Ignacio Javier Fernandez, Lukas Anschuetz","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09473-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate surgical and audiological outcomes of different endoscopic ossiculoplasty (endo-OPL) techniques and prosthesis materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective study, 292 patients underwent endo-OPL for various ossicular chain pathologies at three university hospitals between 2017 and 2023. We analyzed pre- and postoperative hearing metrics, perforation characteristics, surgical procedures, prosthesis types, and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort showed significant audiological improvement, with the mean preoperative air-bone gap (ABG) reducing from 26.88 dB (SD ± 12.73) to 19.94 dB (SD ± 10.90) at the last follow-up (FU; mean 20.7 months ± 15.53) (p = 0.001), and a graft success rate of 94.2%. Significant postoperative ABG improvements were observed with bony partial ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP) (p < 0.001), titanium total ossicular replacement prostheses (TORP) (p = 0.008), and semi-synthetic TORP (p = 0.016). Both cement PORP and bony PORP groups showed consistent ABG improvements over two FU visits. Conversely, titanium based PORP and TORP demonstrated initial improvements but later showed deterioration. Prosthesis extrusion and dislocation rates were 8.4% and 4.2% for titanium PORP, and 0% and 5.2% for titanium TORP, respectively, at the last FU. Endo-OPL combined with additional mastoidectomy (n = 59) did not yield significant ABG improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This multicenter study supports the efficacy of endo-OPL as a valuable technique to improve hearing outcomes in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. It highlights the superior performance of specific prosthesis materials and demonstrates that endo-OPL without additional mastoidectomy provides better hearing results, emphasizing the benefits of mastoid preservation in exclusive endoscopic procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":520614,"journal":{"name":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09473-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate surgical and audiological outcomes of different endoscopic ossiculoplasty (endo-OPL) techniques and prosthesis materials.

Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 292 patients underwent endo-OPL for various ossicular chain pathologies at three university hospitals between 2017 and 2023. We analyzed pre- and postoperative hearing metrics, perforation characteristics, surgical procedures, prosthesis types, and complication rates.

Results: The cohort showed significant audiological improvement, with the mean preoperative air-bone gap (ABG) reducing from 26.88 dB (SD ± 12.73) to 19.94 dB (SD ± 10.90) at the last follow-up (FU; mean 20.7 months ± 15.53) (p = 0.001), and a graft success rate of 94.2%. Significant postoperative ABG improvements were observed with bony partial ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP) (p < 0.001), titanium total ossicular replacement prostheses (TORP) (p = 0.008), and semi-synthetic TORP (p = 0.016). Both cement PORP and bony PORP groups showed consistent ABG improvements over two FU visits. Conversely, titanium based PORP and TORP demonstrated initial improvements but later showed deterioration. Prosthesis extrusion and dislocation rates were 8.4% and 4.2% for titanium PORP, and 0% and 5.2% for titanium TORP, respectively, at the last FU. Endo-OPL combined with additional mastoidectomy (n = 59) did not yield significant ABG improvements.

Conclusion: This multicenter study supports the efficacy of endo-OPL as a valuable technique to improve hearing outcomes in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. It highlights the superior performance of specific prosthesis materials and demonstrates that endo-OPL without additional mastoidectomy provides better hearing results, emphasizing the benefits of mastoid preservation in exclusive endoscopic procedures.

内镜下听骨成形术:来自292例多中心经验的听力学和外科结果。
目的:评价不同内镜下听骨成形术(endoo - opl)技术和假体材料的手术和听力学效果。方法:在这项多中心回顾性研究中,2017年至2023年,292例因各种听骨链病变在三所大学医院接受了内opl手术。我们分析了术前和术后听力指标、穿孔特征、手术方式、假体类型和并发症发生率。结果:该队列显示出明显的听力学改善,平均术前气骨间隙(ABG)从26.88 dB (SD±12.73)下降到最后一次随访时的19.94 dB (SD±10.90);平均20.7个月±15.53个月(p = 0.001),移植成功率94.2%。骨部分听骨置换术(PORP)术后ABG明显改善(p结论:这项多中心研究支持内opl作为一种有价值的技术改善传导性或混合性听力损失患者的听力结果的有效性。它强调了特定假体材料的优越性能,并证明无需额外乳突切除术的内opl可以提供更好的听力结果,强调了乳突保存在独家内镜手术中的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信