Site of Collapse during Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopy Is Associated with Polysomnographic Endotypic Traits.

Sara Op de Beeck, Daniel Vena, Eli Van de Perck, Dwayne Mann, Ali Azarbarzin, Raichel M Alex, Marijke Dieltjens, Marc Willemen, Johan Verbraecken, Andrew Wellman, Scott A Sands, Olivier M Vanderveken
{"title":"Site of Collapse during Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopy Is Associated with Polysomnographic Endotypic Traits.","authors":"Sara Op de Beeck, Daniel Vena, Eli Van de Perck, Dwayne Mann, Ali Azarbarzin, Raichel M Alex, Marijke Dieltjens, Marc Willemen, Johan Verbraecken, Andrew Wellman, Scott A Sands, Olivier M Vanderveken","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202408-871OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Both the site of upper airway collapse during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and pathophysiological endotypic traits are associated with non-CPAP treatment outcomes for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Reduced hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) treatment efficacy has been associated with complete concentric collapse at the level of the palate (CCCp), lateral wall collapse, lower arousal threshold, and poor dilator muscle compensation. However, these predictors may not be independent. Currently, the relationship between the site of upper airway collapse (structure) and pathophysiological endotypic traits (function) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined 182 patients (median[95%CI], apnea-hypopnea index (AHI): 24.2[17.6,32.8], body-mass index (BMI): 27.8[25.2,30.5], age: 51.3[40.4,58.8]) who underwent in-laboratory polysomnography and DISE. All DISE studies were scored by one researcher, thereby avoiding inter-rater variability. Endotypic traits (loop gain, collapsibility, arousal threshold, and compensation) were estimated using routine polysomnography (Sands et al. AJRCCM 2018). Linear regression quantified differences in traits between DISE categories. Multivariable logistic regression quantified associations between DISE categories (dependent variable, with versus without a certain collapse type) and individual traits. Analyses were mutually adjusted for other endotypic traits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CCCp was independently associated with greater collapsibility (Δ collapsibility = 9.8[4.6,15.0]%, p<0.001with vs. without CCCp, odds ratio = 6.9[95%CI:2.2,22.1] per 2SD increase in collapsibility [SD=15.9%];), but a lower arousal threshold (Δ arousal threshold =-8.4[-15.6,-1.2]%; OR=5.4[1.2,24.2] per 2SD [SD=24.9%];). Conversely, complete tongue base collapse was associated with less-severe collapsibility (Δ collapsibility =-5.9[-10.2,-1.6]%, OR=5.0[1.4, 17.9];), but a higher arousal threshold (Δ arousal threshold = 7.6[1.6,13.5]%, OR=5.7[1.4, 23.5];). Complete lateral wall collapse was independently associated with reduced compensation (Δ compensation =-8.0[-14.5,-1.5]%, p=0.018), OR=3.6[1.2, 10.4] per 2 SD [SD=17.5%]; whereas epiglottic collapse was associated with greater compensation (Δ compensation = 8.1[1.0,15.3]%, OR=5.8[1.1,31.2]). Findings persisted with additional adjustment for AHI and BMI, except for collapsibility and tongue base collapse. Loop gain was not associated with any site of collapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different sites of upper airway collapse manifest distinctly different pathophysiological traits in OSA patients. The greater collapsibility and lower arousal threshold seen with CCCp and reduced compensation with lateral wall collapse may help explain reduced non-CPAP treatment efficacy in these populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202408-871OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Both the site of upper airway collapse during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and pathophysiological endotypic traits are associated with non-CPAP treatment outcomes for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Reduced hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) treatment efficacy has been associated with complete concentric collapse at the level of the palate (CCCp), lateral wall collapse, lower arousal threshold, and poor dilator muscle compensation. However, these predictors may not be independent. Currently, the relationship between the site of upper airway collapse (structure) and pathophysiological endotypic traits (function) remains unknown.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined 182 patients (median[95%CI], apnea-hypopnea index (AHI): 24.2[17.6,32.8], body-mass index (BMI): 27.8[25.2,30.5], age: 51.3[40.4,58.8]) who underwent in-laboratory polysomnography and DISE. All DISE studies were scored by one researcher, thereby avoiding inter-rater variability. Endotypic traits (loop gain, collapsibility, arousal threshold, and compensation) were estimated using routine polysomnography (Sands et al. AJRCCM 2018). Linear regression quantified differences in traits between DISE categories. Multivariable logistic regression quantified associations between DISE categories (dependent variable, with versus without a certain collapse type) and individual traits. Analyses were mutually adjusted for other endotypic traits.

Results: CCCp was independently associated with greater collapsibility (Δ collapsibility = 9.8[4.6,15.0]%, p<0.001with vs. without CCCp, odds ratio = 6.9[95%CI:2.2,22.1] per 2SD increase in collapsibility [SD=15.9%];), but a lower arousal threshold (Δ arousal threshold =-8.4[-15.6,-1.2]%; OR=5.4[1.2,24.2] per 2SD [SD=24.9%];). Conversely, complete tongue base collapse was associated with less-severe collapsibility (Δ collapsibility =-5.9[-10.2,-1.6]%, OR=5.0[1.4, 17.9];), but a higher arousal threshold (Δ arousal threshold = 7.6[1.6,13.5]%, OR=5.7[1.4, 23.5];). Complete lateral wall collapse was independently associated with reduced compensation (Δ compensation =-8.0[-14.5,-1.5]%, p=0.018), OR=3.6[1.2, 10.4] per 2 SD [SD=17.5%]; whereas epiglottic collapse was associated with greater compensation (Δ compensation = 8.1[1.0,15.3]%, OR=5.8[1.1,31.2]). Findings persisted with additional adjustment for AHI and BMI, except for collapsibility and tongue base collapse. Loop gain was not associated with any site of collapse.

Conclusions: Different sites of upper airway collapse manifest distinctly different pathophysiological traits in OSA patients. The greater collapsibility and lower arousal threshold seen with CCCp and reduced compensation with lateral wall collapse may help explain reduced non-CPAP treatment efficacy in these populations.

药物诱发睡眠内窥镜检查时塌陷部位与多导睡眠图内窥镜特征相关。
理由:药物性睡眠内镜检查(DISE)时上呼吸道塌陷的部位和病理生理内型特征与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的非cpap治疗结果相关。舌下神经刺激(HGNS)治疗效果降低与上颚水平完全同心塌陷(CCCp)、侧壁塌陷、唤醒阈值降低和扩张肌代偿不良有关。然而,这些预测因素可能不是独立的。目前,上呼吸道塌陷的部位(结构)与病理生理内型特征(功能)之间的关系尚不清楚。方法:本回顾性队列研究对182例(中位数[95%CI],呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI): 24.2[17.6,32.8],身体质量指数(BMI): 27.8[25.2,30.5],年龄:51.3[40.4,58.8])接受实验室多导睡眠图和DISE检查的患者进行研究。所有的DISE研究均由一位研究者评分,从而避免了评分者之间的差异。内源性性状(环路增益、可折叠性、唤醒阈值和补偿)使用常规多导睡眠描记仪进行估计(Sands等)。AJRCCM 2018)。线性回归量化了疾病类别间性状的差异。多变量逻辑回归量化了疾病分类(因变量,有或没有某种崩溃类型)和个体特征之间的关联。其他内型性状的分析相互调整。结果:CCCp与更大的湿陷性独立相关(Δ湿陷性= 9.8[4.6,15.0]%)。结论:OSA患者不同部位的上气道萎陷表现出明显不同的病理生理特征。CCCp更大的可塌陷性和更低的觉醒阈值,以及侧壁塌陷的代偿减少,可能有助于解释这些人群非cpap治疗效果降低的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信