Long-acting reversible contraception initiation after medication abortion: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.9 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Summer L Martins, Jill Miller, Madeline Mahoney, Katelyn M Tessier, Sarah A Traxler, Christy M Boraas
{"title":"Long-acting reversible contraception initiation after medication abortion: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Summer L Martins, Jill Miller, Madeline Mahoney, Katelyn M Tessier, Sarah A Traxler, Christy M Boraas","doi":"10.1186/s40834-025-00371-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication abortion (MAB) accounts for an increasing proportion of in-clinic abortions in the United States and poses unique considerations for provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Studies of LARC initiation among MAB patients mostly consist of trials where financial barriers to LARC were removed. We sought to identify correlates of LARC initiation post-MAB in a community-based setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who presented to a Planned Parenthood Health Center in Minnesota in 2016 for MAB, chose LARC as their intended post-abortion contraceptive method in counseling, and returned to the clinic for their routine follow-up visit (n = 335). We abstracted sociodemographic and reproductive health history variables and used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for LARC initiation post-abortion (≤ 30 days of mifepristone administration).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participants predominantly self-identified as non-Hispanic and White and had a mean age of 26 years. Overall, 72.8% (n = 244) initiated their desired LARC method by 30 days post-abortion. There was no significant (p < 0.05) association between LARC initiation and most variables: race, ethnicity, age, distance from clinic, body mass index, gestational age, gravidity, prior abortions, and number of children. However, odds of LARC initiation were significantly lower among participants who did not use any health insurance (vs. private insurance) for contraceptive coverage at their MAB follow-up visit (age-adjusted OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.69). Findings were similar for initiation of the IUD, specifically (age-adjusted OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.97), but not statistically significant for the implant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lack of health insurance may be a barrier to LARC initiation for MAB patients. Facilitators of LARC initiation in the context of MAB remain unclear and warrant further research to optimize patient-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00371-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication abortion (MAB) accounts for an increasing proportion of in-clinic abortions in the United States and poses unique considerations for provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Studies of LARC initiation among MAB patients mostly consist of trials where financial barriers to LARC were removed. We sought to identify correlates of LARC initiation post-MAB in a community-based setting.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who presented to a Planned Parenthood Health Center in Minnesota in 2016 for MAB, chose LARC as their intended post-abortion contraceptive method in counseling, and returned to the clinic for their routine follow-up visit (n = 335). We abstracted sociodemographic and reproductive health history variables and used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for LARC initiation post-abortion (≤ 30 days of mifepristone administration).

Results: Study participants predominantly self-identified as non-Hispanic and White and had a mean age of 26 years. Overall, 72.8% (n = 244) initiated their desired LARC method by 30 days post-abortion. There was no significant (p < 0.05) association between LARC initiation and most variables: race, ethnicity, age, distance from clinic, body mass index, gestational age, gravidity, prior abortions, and number of children. However, odds of LARC initiation were significantly lower among participants who did not use any health insurance (vs. private insurance) for contraceptive coverage at their MAB follow-up visit (age-adjusted OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.69). Findings were similar for initiation of the IUD, specifically (age-adjusted OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.97), but not statistically significant for the implant.

Conclusions: Lack of health insurance may be a barrier to LARC initiation for MAB patients. Facilitators of LARC initiation in the context of MAB remain unclear and warrant further research to optimize patient-centered care.

药物流产后开始长效可逆避孕:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:在美国,药物流产(MAB)在临床流产中所占的比例越来越大,这对提供长效可逆避孕(LARC)提出了独特的考虑。在单克隆抗体患者中启动LARC的研究主要包括消除LARC的经济障碍的试验。我们试图在社区环境中确定mab后LARC启动的相关因素。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,患者于2016年到明尼苏达州计划生育健康中心接受MAB治疗,在咨询中选择LARC作为流产后避孕方法,并返回诊所进行常规随访(n = 335)。我们提取了社会人口学和生殖健康史变量,并使用逻辑回归来估计流产后(≤米非司酮用药30天)LARC开始的优势比(ORs)。结果:研究参与者主要自我认定为非西班牙裔白人,平均年龄为26岁。总体而言,72.8% (n = 244)在流产后30天开始了他们想要的LARC方法。结论:缺乏健康保险可能是单克隆抗体患者启动LARC的障碍。MAB背景下LARC启动的促进因素尚不清楚,需要进一步研究以优化以患者为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信