Impact of Implementing Checklist Management Combined with SOP on Nursing Quality Among ENT Surgery Nurses.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-05-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S508787
Liyan Ren, Li Han, Fumin Ping, Yanli Yin, Tao Liang, Fang Wang
{"title":"Impact of Implementing Checklist Management Combined with SOP on Nursing Quality Among ENT Surgery Nurses.","authors":"Liyan Ren, Li Han, Fumin Ping, Yanli Yin, Tao Liang, Fang Wang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S508787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgeries require meticulous nursing care due to their complexity and risk of complications. Traditional nursing models often lack the standardization needed to ensure consistent quality and patient safety. This study aimed to explore the application and effectiveness of checklist management combined with Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) in ENT surgery nursing and its impact on nursing quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an experimental study using a pretest-posttest control group design. A total of 200 patients undergoing ENT surgery in the Otolaryngology Department of our hospital from April 2023 to April 2024 were randomly divided into control group and intervention group, including 100 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing management, while the intervention group was subjected to checklist management combined with SOP. The intervention outcomes, nursing quality scores, and incidence of surgery-related adverse events were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics of the two groups showed no significant differences, indicating comparability (P>0.05). After the nursing intervention, the intervention group demonstrated better outcomes than the control group, with lower Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) scores (P<0.05). The intervention group also showed higher General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) scores, indicating better comfort levels (P<0.05). The incidence of device-related adverse events in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Additionally, the intervention group had higher physician satisfaction scores (P<0.05), higher patient satisfaction scores (P<0.05), better management effectiveness scores (P<0.05), and significantly improved nursing quality scores compared to the control group (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Checklist management combined with SOP demonstrates excellent effectiveness in ENT surgery nursing, enhancing patient comfort and satisfaction, significantly improving nursing quality, reducing the incidence of device-related adverse events, and substantially increasing physician satisfaction. It holds great potential for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1735-1746"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S508787","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgeries require meticulous nursing care due to their complexity and risk of complications. Traditional nursing models often lack the standardization needed to ensure consistent quality and patient safety. This study aimed to explore the application and effectiveness of checklist management combined with Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) in ENT surgery nursing and its impact on nursing quality improvement.

Methods: This was an experimental study using a pretest-posttest control group design. A total of 200 patients undergoing ENT surgery in the Otolaryngology Department of our hospital from April 2023 to April 2024 were randomly divided into control group and intervention group, including 100 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing management, while the intervention group was subjected to checklist management combined with SOP. The intervention outcomes, nursing quality scores, and incidence of surgery-related adverse events were compared between the two groups.

Results: The baseline characteristics of the two groups showed no significant differences, indicating comparability (P>0.05). After the nursing intervention, the intervention group demonstrated better outcomes than the control group, with lower Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) scores (P<0.05). The intervention group also showed higher General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) scores, indicating better comfort levels (P<0.05). The incidence of device-related adverse events in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Additionally, the intervention group had higher physician satisfaction scores (P<0.05), higher patient satisfaction scores (P<0.05), better management effectiveness scores (P<0.05), and significantly improved nursing quality scores compared to the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Checklist management combined with SOP demonstrates excellent effectiveness in ENT surgery nursing, enhancing patient comfort and satisfaction, significantly improving nursing quality, reducing the incidence of device-related adverse events, and substantially increasing physician satisfaction. It holds great potential for clinical application.

实施检查表管理与SOP结合对耳鼻喉外科护士护理质量的影响。
目的:耳鼻喉(ENT)手术因其复杂性和并发症的危险性,需要精心的护理。传统的护理模式往往缺乏标准化,以确保一致的质量和患者的安全。本研究旨在探讨检查表管理结合标准操作程序(SOP)在耳鼻喉外科护理中的应用及效果,以及对护理质量提高的影响。方法:采用前测后测对照组设计进行实验研究。选取2023年4月至2024年4月在我院耳鼻喉科行耳鼻喉外科手术的患者200例,随机分为对照组和干预组,每组各100例。对照组采用常规护理管理,干预组采用检查表结合SOP管理。比较两组干预结果、护理质量评分、手术相关不良事件发生率。结果:两组患者基线特征差异无统计学意义,具有可比性(P < 0.05)。护理干预后,干预组效果优于对照组,耳鸣障碍量表(THI)得分较低(p)。结论:检查表管理结合SOP在耳鼻喉科手术护理中效果显著,提高了患者的舒适度和满意度,显著提高了护理质量,降低了器械相关不良事件的发生率,大大提高了医师满意度。具有很大的临床应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信