Pain in women with and without bipolar spectrum disorder.

IF 2.4 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2025-05-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2025.1501382
Amanda L Stuart, Michael Berk, Julie A Pasco, Mohammadreza Mohebbi, Shae E Quirk, Lana J Williams
{"title":"Pain in women with and without bipolar spectrum disorder.","authors":"Amanda L Stuart, Michael Berk, Julie A Pasco, Mohammadreza Mohebbi, Shae E Quirk, Lana J Williams","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1501382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bipolar disorder is associated with several physical conditions and possibly increased pain, although research outside hospital settings is limited. We compared perceived pain among population-based women with and without bipolar disorder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study examined 113 women with bipolar disorder (59 euthymic, 54 symptomatic in past month) and 316 age-matched women without bipolar disorder drawn from studies located in the same region of south-eastern Australia. Mental disorders were confirmed by clinical interview (SCID-I/NP). Pain during the past week was determined by numeric rating scale (0-10, 10 = pain as severe as I can imagine) and deemed present if ≥5. Demographic, lifestyle, and health information was obtained via questionnaire. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals for the likelihood of pain were estimated using marginal binary logistic regression models, adjusting for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women with bipolar disorder who were euthymic at the appointment were at increased odds of headache [adjOR 3.4, 95% CI (1.4, 7.9)], back pain [2.6 (1.3, 5.4)], overall pain(s) [5.7 (2.9, 11.4)], pain at ≥3 sites [2.3 (1.0, 5.2)] and were in pain ≥50% time spent awake [2.3 (1.1, 5.1)] compared to women without bipolar disorder. The pattern of association was similar but stronger for women symptomatic in the past month; headache [6.0 (2.6, 13.9)], back pain [4.2 (2.0, 8.5)], overall pain(s) [7.2 (3.4, 15.4)], pain at ≥3 sites [5.1 (2.3, 11.1)] and ≥50% time in pain [4.5 (2.2, 9.3)]. Daily activity interference from pain did not differ between groups (all <i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with bipolar disorder are more likely to report pain regardless of phase. Assessment and management of pain is necessary to reduce associated burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1501382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1501382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bipolar disorder is associated with several physical conditions and possibly increased pain, although research outside hospital settings is limited. We compared perceived pain among population-based women with and without bipolar disorder.

Method: This study examined 113 women with bipolar disorder (59 euthymic, 54 symptomatic in past month) and 316 age-matched women without bipolar disorder drawn from studies located in the same region of south-eastern Australia. Mental disorders were confirmed by clinical interview (SCID-I/NP). Pain during the past week was determined by numeric rating scale (0-10, 10 = pain as severe as I can imagine) and deemed present if ≥5. Demographic, lifestyle, and health information was obtained via questionnaire. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals for the likelihood of pain were estimated using marginal binary logistic regression models, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: Women with bipolar disorder who were euthymic at the appointment were at increased odds of headache [adjOR 3.4, 95% CI (1.4, 7.9)], back pain [2.6 (1.3, 5.4)], overall pain(s) [5.7 (2.9, 11.4)], pain at ≥3 sites [2.3 (1.0, 5.2)] and were in pain ≥50% time spent awake [2.3 (1.1, 5.1)] compared to women without bipolar disorder. The pattern of association was similar but stronger for women symptomatic in the past month; headache [6.0 (2.6, 13.9)], back pain [4.2 (2.0, 8.5)], overall pain(s) [7.2 (3.4, 15.4)], pain at ≥3 sites [5.1 (2.3, 11.1)] and ≥50% time in pain [4.5 (2.2, 9.3)]. Daily activity interference from pain did not differ between groups (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Women with bipolar disorder are more likely to report pain regardless of phase. Assessment and management of pain is necessary to reduce associated burden.

患有和不患有双相情感障碍的女性的疼痛。
导读:双相情感障碍与几种身体状况和可能增加的疼痛有关,尽管医院外的研究有限。我们比较了以人群为基础的患有和不患有双相情感障碍的女性的感知疼痛。方法:本研究调查了来自澳大利亚东南部同一地区的113名双相情感障碍女性(59名健康,54名过去一个月出现症状)和316名年龄匹配的无双相情感障碍女性。通过临床访谈(scid - 1 /NP)确认精神障碍。过去一周的疼痛由数字评定量表确定(0- 10,10 =我能想象到的最严重的疼痛),如果≥5则视为存在。通过问卷调查获得人口统计、生活方式和健康信息。使用边际二元逻辑回归模型估计疼痛可能性的95%置信区间的优势比(OR),并对潜在混杂因素进行调整。结果:与未患双相情感障碍的女性相比,在预约时情绪良好的双相情感障碍女性出现头痛[adjOR 3.4, 95% CI(1.4, 7.9)]、背部疼痛[2.6(1.3,5.4)]、整体疼痛[5.7(2.9,11.4)]、疼痛≥3个部位[2.3(1.0,5.2)]和清醒时间疼痛≥50%[2.3(1.1,5.1)]的几率增加。在过去一个月出现症状的女性中,这种关联模式相似,但更强;头痛[6.0(2.6,13.9)],背部疼痛[4.2(2.0,8.5)],整体疼痛[7.2(3.4,15.4)],≥3个部位疼痛[5.1(2.3,11.1)]和≥50%疼痛时间[4.5(2.2,9.3)]。疼痛对日常活动的干扰在两组间无差异(p < 0.05)。结论:双相情感障碍的女性更容易报告疼痛,无论处于哪个阶段。评估和管理疼痛对于减轻相关负担是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信