Bereavement Training in the Workplace, Can it Help Bridge the Grief Support Gap? A Qualitative Evaluation of Employers' and Employees' Views.

Omega Pub Date : 2025-05-28 DOI:10.1177/00302228251345033
Felicity Dewhurst, Royce Turner, Laura Barrett, Elizabeth Westhead, Donna Wakefield, Barbara Hanratty
{"title":"Bereavement Training in the Workplace, Can it Help Bridge the Grief Support Gap? A Qualitative Evaluation of Employers' and Employees' Views.","authors":"Felicity Dewhurst, Royce Turner, Laura Barrett, Elizabeth Westhead, Donna Wakefield, Barbara Hanratty","doi":"10.1177/00302228251345033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundBereavement is universal, whilst grief is a natural response to loss, it can have detrimental effects on physical and mental well-being. Bereavement support is not widely available, and workplaces could play a key role in providing consistent, equitable support.AimWe explored the views of employers and employees on bereavement training in the workplace. <b>Methods:</b> St Oswald's Hospice, UK, delivered bereavement training to 343 employers and employees from 105 regional and national workplaces. Purposive sampling selected 16 individuals for qualitative semi-structured interviews.FindingsFindings were organised into four themes: unique challenges faced by employees and employers after bereavement; gap in training; need for tiered, bespoke training; requirement for policy change. Bereavement training in the workplace was seen as beneficial.ConclusionsThis study addresses a crucial gap in bereavement support by exploring grief training in the workplace. Policy recommendations include: in-house and external support and paid leave as standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"302228251345033"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228251345033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundBereavement is universal, whilst grief is a natural response to loss, it can have detrimental effects on physical and mental well-being. Bereavement support is not widely available, and workplaces could play a key role in providing consistent, equitable support.AimWe explored the views of employers and employees on bereavement training in the workplace. Methods: St Oswald's Hospice, UK, delivered bereavement training to 343 employers and employees from 105 regional and national workplaces. Purposive sampling selected 16 individuals for qualitative semi-structured interviews.FindingsFindings were organised into four themes: unique challenges faced by employees and employers after bereavement; gap in training; need for tiered, bespoke training; requirement for policy change. Bereavement training in the workplace was seen as beneficial.ConclusionsThis study addresses a crucial gap in bereavement support by exploring grief training in the workplace. Policy recommendations include: in-house and external support and paid leave as standard.

职场丧亲培训,能帮助弥合悲伤支持差距吗?对雇主和雇员观点的定性评价。
丧亲之痛是普遍的,虽然悲伤是对失去的自然反应,但它会对身体和精神健康产生有害影响。丧亲支持并不普遍,工作场所可以在提供一致、公平的支持方面发挥关键作用。我们探讨了雇主和雇员对工作场所丧亲培训的看法。方法:英国圣奥斯瓦尔德临终关怀医院对来自105个地区和国家工作场所的343名雇主和雇员进行了丧亲培训。目的抽样选取16人进行定性半结构化访谈。调查结果调查结果分为四个主题:雇员和雇主在失去亲人后面临的独特挑战;培训间隙;对分层定制培训的需求;政策变更的需求。工作场所的丧亲培训被认为是有益的。结论:本研究通过探索工作场所的悲伤培训,解决了丧亲支持方面的一个关键缺口。政策建议包括:内部和外部支持和带薪休假作为标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信