Pulmonary artery pressure assessed by catheterization and its concordance with transthoracic echocardiographic estimates in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: experience of the Colombian Pulmonary Hypertension Network in a real-life study.

Critical care science Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20250182
Mauricio Orozco-Levi, Alejandro Londoño, Rafael Conde, Manuel Conrado Pacheco Gallego, Julián Cortes Colorado, Carlos Jaime Velázquez, Ricardo Gómez Palau, Lucila Teresa Flórez de Arco, Juliana De Luque, Ana Maria Pérez-Zauner, Alba Ramírez-Sarmiento
{"title":"Pulmonary artery pressure assessed by catheterization and its concordance with transthoracic echocardiographic estimates in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: experience of the Colombian Pulmonary Hypertension Network in a real-life study.","authors":"Mauricio Orozco-Levi, Alejandro Londoño, Rafael Conde, Manuel Conrado Pacheco Gallego, Julián Cortes Colorado, Carlos Jaime Velázquez, Ricardo Gómez Palau, Lucila Teresa Flórez de Arco, Juliana De Luque, Ana Maria Pérez-Zauner, Alba Ramírez-Sarmiento","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20250182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the correlation and concordance of pulmonary artery systolic pressure values measured via right heart catheterization and estimated via transthoracic echocardiography based on data from a multicenter cohort of patients with pulmonary hypertension in Colombia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted of patients with pulmonary hypertension classified into Groups 1 or 4 according to the definitions of the ESC/ERS-PH-2022 guidelines. Patients were obtained from the Colombian Pulmonary Hypertension Network (HAPredco) database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 633 patients were identified and included in this study. Among these patients, 77.7% (n = 492) had complete data from transthoracic echocardiography at diagnosis, 58,3% (n = 369) had complete data from right heart catheterization at the time of diagnosis, and 264 (41.7%) had complete data from both tests at diagnosis, with a difference in days between them of 1 (84). The values of pulmonary artery systolic pressure estimated by transthoracic echocardiography and those obtained by right heart catheterization were significantly correlated (p < 0.001) in the entire population evaluated, as was the correlation assessed for those patients with a gap of ≤ 7 days (p = 0.0001) or ≤ 48 hours (p = 0.041) between the two examinations; however, these findings presented a low Spearman (0.32 for ≤ 7 days and 0.264 for ≤ 48 hours) and Lin´s correlation coefficient (0.32 for ≤ 7 days and 0.21 for ≤ 48 hours).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pulmonary artery systolic pressure values estimated via transthoracic echocardiography and measured via right heart catheterization were significantly but weakly linearly correlated, with low concordance. These findings suggest interindividual variability between the pulmonary artery systolic pressure values obtained by the two methods, which may have clinical significance in follow-up and decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"37 ","pages":"e20250182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20250182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the correlation and concordance of pulmonary artery systolic pressure values measured via right heart catheterization and estimated via transthoracic echocardiography based on data from a multicenter cohort of patients with pulmonary hypertension in Colombia.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of patients with pulmonary hypertension classified into Groups 1 or 4 according to the definitions of the ESC/ERS-PH-2022 guidelines. Patients were obtained from the Colombian Pulmonary Hypertension Network (HAPredco) database.

Results: A total of 633 patients were identified and included in this study. Among these patients, 77.7% (n = 492) had complete data from transthoracic echocardiography at diagnosis, 58,3% (n = 369) had complete data from right heart catheterization at the time of diagnosis, and 264 (41.7%) had complete data from both tests at diagnosis, with a difference in days between them of 1 (84). The values of pulmonary artery systolic pressure estimated by transthoracic echocardiography and those obtained by right heart catheterization were significantly correlated (p < 0.001) in the entire population evaluated, as was the correlation assessed for those patients with a gap of ≤ 7 days (p = 0.0001) or ≤ 48 hours (p = 0.041) between the two examinations; however, these findings presented a low Spearman (0.32 for ≤ 7 days and 0.264 for ≤ 48 hours) and Lin´s correlation coefficient (0.32 for ≤ 7 days and 0.21 for ≤ 48 hours).

Conclusion: The pulmonary artery systolic pressure values estimated via transthoracic echocardiography and measured via right heart catheterization were significantly but weakly linearly correlated, with low concordance. These findings suggest interindividual variability between the pulmonary artery systolic pressure values obtained by the two methods, which may have clinical significance in follow-up and decision-making.

肺动脉高压患者经导管插管评估肺动脉压及其与经胸超声心动图评估的一致性:哥伦比亚肺动脉高压网络在现实生活中的研究经验
目的:基于哥伦比亚肺动脉高压患者的多中心队列数据,评价右心导管测量的肺动脉收缩压值与经胸超声心动图估计的肺动脉收缩压值的相关性和一致性。方法:回顾性研究根据ESC/ERS-PH-2022指南的定义将肺动脉高压患者分为1组和4组。患者数据来自哥伦比亚肺动脉高压网络(HAPredco)数据库。结果:共有633例患者被纳入本研究。在这些患者中,77.7% (n = 492)在诊断时有完整的经胸超声心动图数据,58.3% (n = 369)在诊断时有完整的右心导管数据,264(41.7%)在诊断时有完整的两项检查数据,两者之间的天数差异为1(84)天。经胸超声心动图测得的肺动脉收缩压值与右心导管测得的肺动脉收缩压值在整个评估人群中显著相关(p < 0.001),对于两次检查间隔≤7天(p = 0.0001)或≤48小时(p = 0.041)的患者,评估的相关性也是如此;然而,这些发现显示了较低的Spearman(≤7天0.32,≤48小时0.264)和Lin’s相关系数(≤7天0.32,≤48小时0.21)。结论:经胸超声心动图测得的肺动脉收缩压值与右心导管测得的肺动脉收缩压值呈显著但微弱的线性相关,一致性较低。这些结果提示两种方法获得的肺动脉收缩压值存在个体差异,可能对随访和决策具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信