Feasibility of implementing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a middle-income country: systematic review and cardiac arrest case series.

Critical care science Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20250320
Gabriel Afonso Dutra Kreling, Pedro Vitale Mendes, Luis Carlos Maia Cardozo Junior, Karina Turaça Kasahaya, Marcelo Park, Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar, Ian Ward A Maia
{"title":"Feasibility of implementing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a middle-income country: systematic review and cardiac arrest case series.","authors":"Gabriel Afonso Dutra Kreling, Pedro Vitale Mendes, Luis Carlos Maia Cardozo Junior, Karina Turaça Kasahaya, Marcelo Park, Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar, Ian Ward A Maia","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20250320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the consistency of current evidence supporting the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation to treat patients with cardiac arrest and assess the plausibility of implementing an extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation program in a public health care system hospital in a middle-income country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review, meta-analysis, meta-regression analysis, and trial sequence analysis were performed to assess the consistency of current evidence supporting the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation to treat patients with cardiac arrest. Additionally, a local cardiac arrest registry was analyzed to identify potential patients eligible for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review included 31 studies. The main and sensitivity analyses consistently demonstrated that extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with favorable neurological outcomes (cerebral performance category 1 or 2, RR 1.45, 95%CI 1.19 - 1.77) and survival (RR 1.29, 95%CI 1.10 - 1.52). Age was inversely related to neurological outcome and survival. Our cardiac arrest registry included 55 patients with a median age of 54 years and a survival rate of 18.2% (10/55). Survivors had an initial shockable rhythm. In the most inclusive scenario, 13 patients would have been eligible for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Under stricter criteria (age ≤ 65 years, low-flow time ≤ 30 min, and number of defibrillations ≥ 3), 4 patients would have been eligible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with refractory cardiac arrest is associated with improved neurological outcomes and survival. The use of an extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation program in our hospital is plausible. Using conservative eligibility criteria, we estimate that at least four patients would be eligible for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation within six months of the program initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"37 ","pages":"e20250320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20250320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the consistency of current evidence supporting the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation to treat patients with cardiac arrest and assess the plausibility of implementing an extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation program in a public health care system hospital in a middle-income country.

Methods: A systematic review, meta-analysis, meta-regression analysis, and trial sequence analysis were performed to assess the consistency of current evidence supporting the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation to treat patients with cardiac arrest. Additionally, a local cardiac arrest registry was analyzed to identify potential patients eligible for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Results: The systematic review included 31 studies. The main and sensitivity analyses consistently demonstrated that extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with favorable neurological outcomes (cerebral performance category 1 or 2, RR 1.45, 95%CI 1.19 - 1.77) and survival (RR 1.29, 95%CI 1.10 - 1.52). Age was inversely related to neurological outcome and survival. Our cardiac arrest registry included 55 patients with a median age of 54 years and a survival rate of 18.2% (10/55). Survivors had an initial shockable rhythm. In the most inclusive scenario, 13 patients would have been eligible for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Under stricter criteria (age ≤ 65 years, low-flow time ≤ 30 min, and number of defibrillations ≥ 3), 4 patients would have been eligible.

Conclusion: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with refractory cardiac arrest is associated with improved neurological outcomes and survival. The use of an extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation program in our hospital is plausible. Using conservative eligibility criteria, we estimate that at least four patients would be eligible for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation within six months of the program initiation.

在中等收入国家实施体外心肺复苏的可行性:系统评价和心脏骤停病例系列。
目的:评估目前支持使用体外心肺复苏治疗心脏骤停患者的证据的一致性,并评估在中等收入国家的公共卫生保健系统医院实施体外心肺复苏计划的可行性。方法:通过系统回顾、荟萃分析、荟萃回归分析和试验序列分析来评估支持体外心肺复苏治疗心脏骤停患者的现有证据的一致性。此外,还分析了局部心脏骤停登记,以确定有资格进行体外心肺复苏的潜在患者。结果:系统评价纳入31项研究。主要分析和敏感性分析一致表明体外心肺复苏与良好的神经预后(脑功能分类1或2,RR 1.45, 95%CI 1.19 - 1.77)和生存(RR 1.29, 95%CI 1.10 - 1.52)相关。年龄与神经预后和生存率呈负相关。我们的心脏骤停登记包括55例患者,中位年龄为54岁,生存率为18.2%(10/55)。幸存者最初有一种令人震惊的节奏。在最全面的情况下,13名患者将有资格进行体外心肺复苏。在更严格的标准下(年龄≤65岁,低流时间≤30分钟,除颤器次数≥3次),有4例患者符合条件。结论:对难治性心脏骤停患者进行体外心肺复苏可改善神经预后和生存率。在我们医院使用体外心肺复苏方案是合理的。使用保守的资格标准,我们估计至少有4名患者在项目启动后6个月内有资格进行体外心肺复苏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信