Efficacy of RTS,S/AS01E only seen in baseline parasitemic and not baseline aparasitemic Plasmodium falciparum-exposed, drug-treated Kenyan adults.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Nathanial K Copeland, Lucas Otieno, June Doryne Otieno, Solomon Otieno, Salome Chira, Karen Ivinson, Irene Onyango, Ruth Wasuna, Hoseah Akala, Amos Onditi, Peter Sifuna, Ben Andagalu, Roselyne Oyugi, Mary Omondi, Stellah Amoit, Emily Locke, Scott Gregory, Elke S Bergmann-Leitner, Hema Pindolia, Mike Raine, Chris Gast, Laina D Mercer, John J Aponte, Marc Lievens, Christian F Ockenhouse, Cynthia K Lee
{"title":"Efficacy of RTS,S/AS01E only seen in baseline parasitemic and not baseline aparasitemic Plasmodium falciparum-exposed, drug-treated Kenyan adults.","authors":"Nathanial K Copeland, Lucas Otieno, June Doryne Otieno, Solomon Otieno, Salome Chira, Karen Ivinson, Irene Onyango, Ruth Wasuna, Hoseah Akala, Amos Onditi, Peter Sifuna, Ben Andagalu, Roselyne Oyugi, Mary Omondi, Stellah Amoit, Emily Locke, Scott Gregory, Elke S Bergmann-Leitner, Hema Pindolia, Mike Raine, Chris Gast, Laina D Mercer, John J Aponte, Marc Lievens, Christian F Ockenhouse, Cynthia K Lee","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaf274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>RTS,S/AS01 vaccine efficacy (VE) was previously shown as lower in African adults than in malaria-naïve US adults, potentially due to concurrent Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) infections. We investigated whether treatment of infection prior to vaccination would lead to improved VE and immunogenicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Phase 2b study in Kenyan adults evaluated the efficacy of RTS,S/AS01E in conjunction with antimalarial chemopreventive drugs. Participants, grouped by baseline presence or absence of Pf infections, were randomized to receive RTS,S/AS01E or rabies vaccine. Four groups received antimalarial drugs prior to immunization and were followed for six months to assess Pf infection. We included an additional group not treated with antimalarial drugs for immunological assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VE (RTS,S/AS01E versus rabies vaccine) was 34.8% (8.9%, 53.4%) and -24.0% (-97%, 22.4%) in baseline Pf-positive and Pf-negative participants, respectively. In RTS,S/AS01E recipients, there were no statistical differences in anti-circumsporozoite (CS) antibody titers in baseline Pf-positive or Pf-negative participants, or in susceptibility to infection during the post-vaccination follow-up period. Drug treatment did not improve anti-CS antibody titers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treating Pf infections during vaccination does not result in increased VE. Anti-CS antibody responses to vaccination do not differ with baseline Pf infection status, drug treatment, or susceptibility to Pf infections.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT04661579; PACTR202006896481432.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf274","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: RTS,S/AS01 vaccine efficacy (VE) was previously shown as lower in African adults than in malaria-naïve US adults, potentially due to concurrent Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) infections. We investigated whether treatment of infection prior to vaccination would lead to improved VE and immunogenicity.

Methods: A Phase 2b study in Kenyan adults evaluated the efficacy of RTS,S/AS01E in conjunction with antimalarial chemopreventive drugs. Participants, grouped by baseline presence or absence of Pf infections, were randomized to receive RTS,S/AS01E or rabies vaccine. Four groups received antimalarial drugs prior to immunization and were followed for six months to assess Pf infection. We included an additional group not treated with antimalarial drugs for immunological assessment.

Results: VE (RTS,S/AS01E versus rabies vaccine) was 34.8% (8.9%, 53.4%) and -24.0% (-97%, 22.4%) in baseline Pf-positive and Pf-negative participants, respectively. In RTS,S/AS01E recipients, there were no statistical differences in anti-circumsporozoite (CS) antibody titers in baseline Pf-positive or Pf-negative participants, or in susceptibility to infection during the post-vaccination follow-up period. Drug treatment did not improve anti-CS antibody titers.

Conclusions: Treating Pf infections during vaccination does not result in increased VE. Anti-CS antibody responses to vaccination do not differ with baseline Pf infection status, drug treatment, or susceptibility to Pf infections.

Clinical trial registration: NCT04661579; PACTR202006896481432.

RTS,S/AS01E仅在基线疟原虫和非基线疟原虫暴露、药物治疗的肯尼亚成年人中有效。
背景:RTS,S/AS01疫苗的有效性(VE)先前显示在非洲成年人中低于malaria-naïve美国成年人,可能是由于同时感染恶性疟原虫(Pf)。我们研究了在接种疫苗前治疗感染是否会改善VE和免疫原性。方法:一项针对肯尼亚成年人的2b期研究评估了RTS,S/AS01E与抗疟疾化学预防药物联合使用的疗效。参与者根据基线是否存在Pf感染分组,随机接受RTS、S/AS01E或狂犬病疫苗。四组在免疫接种前接受抗疟药物治疗,随访6个月以评估Pf感染情况。我们纳入了另一组未使用抗疟药物进行免疫学评估的患者。结果:VE (RTS,S/AS01E vs狂犬病疫苗)在基线nf阳性和nf阴性参与者中分别为34.8%(8.9%,53.4%)和-24.0%(-97%,22.4%)。在RTS,S/AS01E接受者中,基线pf阳性或pf阴性参与者的抗环孢子子(CS)抗体滴度,或接种后随访期间对感染的易感性均无统计学差异。药物治疗没有提高抗cs抗体滴度。结论:在疫苗接种期间治疗Pf感染不会导致VE升高。抗cs抗体对疫苗接种的反应与基线Pf感染状态、药物治疗或对Pf感染的易感性没有差异。临床试验注册:NCT04661579;PACTR202006896481432。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infectious Diseases
Journal of Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
449
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published continuously since 1904, The Journal of Infectious Diseases (JID) is the premier global journal for original research on infectious diseases. The editors welcome Major Articles and Brief Reports describing research results on microbiology, immunology, epidemiology, and related disciplines, on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases; on the microbes that cause them; and on disorders of host immune responses. JID is an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信