Evolution of the Family Medicine Clerkship: A CERA Secondary Analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Bryce A Ringwald, David Banas, Allison Macerollo, Ericka Bruce, Matthew Farrell
{"title":"Evolution of the Family Medicine Clerkship: A CERA Secondary Analysis.","authors":"Bryce A Ringwald, David Banas, Allison Macerollo, Ericka Bruce, Matthew Farrell","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2025.306815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The family medicine clerkship has been found to influence medical students' decision-making regarding specialty choice. Understanding how the family medicine clerkship has changed over the past decade may assist in recruitment efforts. Our study explored trends in family medicine clerkship design, length, and format and correlated these characteristics with high proportions of medical school graduates choosing family medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance annual family medicine clerkship director surveys from 2012 to 2023. We analyzed standard family medicine clerkship structure questions that were asked in each survey. We analyzed trends using Pearson's correlation coefficient test and correlations with χ2 test for independence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the past 10 years, a transition from traditional block-style clerkships toward longitudinal-style clerkships has been increasing. Both block-style and longitudinal-style clerkships have decreased in length, with most clerkships lasting 4 weeks or less. A change also has taken place in the composition of clinical experiences, with reduced use of community preceptors as the primary source of clinical experiences. In 2021, schools with a higher percentage of students working with community preceptors were associated with higher percentages of medical students choosing to pursue family medicine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Alterations in the family medicine clerkships have led to medical students getting decreased and intermittent exposure to family medicine. Most clerkship experiences are not with community preceptors, a major change following the COVID-19 pandemic. The repercussions of recent changes to the family medicine clerkship on the rate of matching medical students into family medicine remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.306815","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The family medicine clerkship has been found to influence medical students' decision-making regarding specialty choice. Understanding how the family medicine clerkship has changed over the past decade may assist in recruitment efforts. Our study explored trends in family medicine clerkship design, length, and format and correlated these characteristics with high proportions of medical school graduates choosing family medicine.

Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance annual family medicine clerkship director surveys from 2012 to 2023. We analyzed standard family medicine clerkship structure questions that were asked in each survey. We analyzed trends using Pearson's correlation coefficient test and correlations with χ2 test for independence.

Results: Over the past 10 years, a transition from traditional block-style clerkships toward longitudinal-style clerkships has been increasing. Both block-style and longitudinal-style clerkships have decreased in length, with most clerkships lasting 4 weeks or less. A change also has taken place in the composition of clinical experiences, with reduced use of community preceptors as the primary source of clinical experiences. In 2021, schools with a higher percentage of students working with community preceptors were associated with higher percentages of medical students choosing to pursue family medicine.

Conclusions: Alterations in the family medicine clerkships have led to medical students getting decreased and intermittent exposure to family medicine. Most clerkship experiences are not with community preceptors, a major change following the COVID-19 pandemic. The repercussions of recent changes to the family medicine clerkship on the rate of matching medical students into family medicine remains unclear.

家庭医学办事员制度的演变:CERA二次分析。
背景与目的:家庭医学见习影响医学生的专业选择决策。了解家庭医学人员在过去十年中的变化可能有助于招聘工作。本研究探讨了家庭医学实习的设计、长度和形式的趋势,并将这些特征与高比例的医学院毕业生选择家庭医学相关联。方法:对学术家庭医学教育研究联盟理事会2012 - 2023年年度家庭医学见习主任调查进行二次分析。我们分析了在每次调查中被问到的标准家庭医学人员结构问题。趋势分析采用Pearson相关系数检验,相关性采用χ2独立检验。结果:在过去的10年里,从传统的块状办事员向纵向办事员的转变越来越多。条块式和纵向式的见习时间都缩短了,大多数见习时间不超过4周。临床经验的构成也发生了变化,减少了使用社区教师作为临床经验的主要来源。2021年,与社区辅导员一起工作的学生比例较高的学校,选择家庭医学的医学生比例也较高。结论:家庭医学办事员制度的改变导致医学生家庭医学接触减少、时断时续。大多数见习经历都不是与社区辅导员一起经历的,这是2019冠状病毒病大流行后的一个重大变化。家庭医学职员制度最近的变化对医学生进入家庭医学的匹配率的影响尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信