The Society for Women in Radiation Oncology Five Years Later: Connection, Representation, and Inclusivity Matter.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Rebecca Krc, Claire C Baniel, Katie Lichter, Simran Jatar, Gabrielle W Peters, Crystal Seldon Taswell, Sara Beltrán Ponce, Emily MacDuffie, Michael C LeCompte, Jie Jane Chen, Kaidi Wang, Amy LoTemplio, Anjali Saripalli, Erin Kaya, Parul Barry, Adrianna Henson Masters, Reshma Jagsi, Jenna M Kahn
{"title":"The Society for Women in Radiation Oncology Five Years Later: Connection, Representation, and Inclusivity Matter.","authors":"Rebecca Krc, Claire C Baniel, Katie Lichter, Simran Jatar, Gabrielle W Peters, Crystal Seldon Taswell, Sara Beltrán Ponce, Emily MacDuffie, Michael C LeCompte, Jie Jane Chen, Kaidi Wang, Amy LoTemplio, Anjali Saripalli, Erin Kaya, Parul Barry, Adrianna Henson Masters, Reshma Jagsi, Jenna M Kahn","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Society for Women in Radiation Oncology (SWRO) was founded in 2017 with a mission to promote representation and gender equity in the field of Radiation Oncology (RO). We aimed to assess the current experiences of SWRO members 5 years after the founding of SWRO using a comprehensive survey of gender-related workforce issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January to February 2023, an anonymous survey was distributed to all current SWRO members. Questions included demographics, family planning/fertility issues, perceptions of the field, and membership needs. Results pertaining to demographics, job satisfaction, mentorship, SWRO membership satisfaction, and future directions are reported in this analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize frequencies of the multiple-choice items on the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was distributed to 461 SWRO members, with a total of 144 responses, resulting in a response rate of 31.3%. The majority of respondents identified as female (96.5%), RO attending physicians (54.2%), located in the United States (76.4%), and with employment in either a private or community-based practice (50.7%). Top reasons for SWRO membership included networking (91%), leadership/professional development (83%), and mentorship (79%). After clinical responsibilities, insufficient institutional mentorship was cited as the second most common limitation to professional productivity, and only a minority of respondents (46.5%) reported being either \"extremely\" or \"somewhat\" satisfied with the current mentorship available to them at their current institution. A majority (69.3%) reported seeking female mentorship outside their current institution. Unwanted sexual comments, attention, or advances by superiors or colleagues was reported by 35.7% of respondents, and 53.6% reported either \"strongly\" or \"somewhat\" agreeing that gender specific biases exist within their program.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights opportunities for improvement related to gender-based obstacles, education and advocacy, support of family-friendly culture shifts, mentorship, and increased physicist engagement which will ultimately promote representation, inclusivity, and gender equity in RO.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2025.05.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Society for Women in Radiation Oncology (SWRO) was founded in 2017 with a mission to promote representation and gender equity in the field of Radiation Oncology (RO). We aimed to assess the current experiences of SWRO members 5 years after the founding of SWRO using a comprehensive survey of gender-related workforce issues.

Methods: From January to February 2023, an anonymous survey was distributed to all current SWRO members. Questions included demographics, family planning/fertility issues, perceptions of the field, and membership needs. Results pertaining to demographics, job satisfaction, mentorship, SWRO membership satisfaction, and future directions are reported in this analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize frequencies of the multiple-choice items on the survey.

Results: The survey was distributed to 461 SWRO members, with a total of 144 responses, resulting in a response rate of 31.3%. The majority of respondents identified as female (96.5%), RO attending physicians (54.2%), located in the United States (76.4%), and with employment in either a private or community-based practice (50.7%). Top reasons for SWRO membership included networking (91%), leadership/professional development (83%), and mentorship (79%). After clinical responsibilities, insufficient institutional mentorship was cited as the second most common limitation to professional productivity, and only a minority of respondents (46.5%) reported being either "extremely" or "somewhat" satisfied with the current mentorship available to them at their current institution. A majority (69.3%) reported seeking female mentorship outside their current institution. Unwanted sexual comments, attention, or advances by superiors or colleagues was reported by 35.7% of respondents, and 53.6% reported either "strongly" or "somewhat" agreeing that gender specific biases exist within their program.

Conclusion: This study highlights opportunities for improvement related to gender-based obstacles, education and advocacy, support of family-friendly culture shifts, mentorship, and increased physicist engagement which will ultimately promote representation, inclusivity, and gender equity in RO.

五年后放射肿瘤学妇女协会:联系,代表性和包容性问题。
背景:放射肿瘤学妇女协会(SWRO)成立于2017年,其使命是促进放射肿瘤学(RO)领域的代表性和性别平等。我们旨在通过对与性别相关的劳动力问题的全面调查,评估SWRO成立5年后SWRO成员的当前经验。方法:于2023年1 - 2月对SWRO所有会员进行匿名调查。问题包括人口统计、计划生育/生育问题、对该领域的看法和会员需求。有关人口统计、工作满意度、指导、SWRO成员满意度和未来发展方向的结果在本分析中报告。描述性统计用于总结调查中多项选择题的出现频率。结果:本次调查共发放给SWRO会员461份,共收到回复144份,回复率为31.3%。大多数受访者确定为女性(96.5%),RO主治医生(54.2%),位于美国(76.4%),并在私人或社区诊所工作(50.7%)。加入SWRO的主要原因包括网络(91%)、领导力/专业发展(83%)和师徒关系(79%)。在临床责任之后,机构指导不足被认为是影响专业生产力的第二大常见限制,只有少数受访者(46.5%)表示对目前机构提供的指导“非常”或“有些”满意。大多数人(69.3%)报告说,他们在当前机构之外寻求女性导师。35.7%的受访者报告了上级或同事不受欢迎的性评论、关注或挑逗,53.6%的受访者表示“强烈”或“有点”同意他们的项目中存在性别偏见。结论:本研究强调了基于性别的障碍、教育和宣传、支持家庭友好型文化转变、指导和增加物理学家参与等方面的改进机会,这些将最终促进RO中的代表性、包容性和性别平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信