Influence of Demographic Characteristics on Perceptions of Pharmacy Faculty Workload Equity: A Post Hoc Analysis

Abstract

Objective

To examine how specific demographic factors affect pharmacy faculty perceptions of workload equity.

Methods

A post hoc analysis of previously published survey results was conducted. Faculty were asked about the comparison of actual vs assigned workload, fairness of assigned workload, domains used by primary decision maker(s) when assigning workload, and the importance of factors to improve perceived fairness. Responses were grouped by gender identity (female vs nonfemale), race and ethnicity (White vs non-White), and clinical practice status (clinical vs nonclinical).

Results

A total of 662 complete responses were received (15.9% response rate). The distribution of effort for research/scholarship differed significantly between females and nonfemales (14.8% vs 22.2%, respectively). Female respondents reported significantly lower alignment between actual and assigned workload and indicated performing more actual service than assigned, compared to nonfemale respondents. This misalignment was also observed among non-White faculty. White faculty were more likely to believe that those assigning workload considered individual context and contributions. Differences were also found in workload allocation across gender identity, race and ethnicity, and clinical practice status, with the most substantial variations in time dedicated to research/scholarship vs clinical practice.

Conclusion

Faculty self-reported workload allocation/assignment and perceptions of actual vs assigned workload varied based on gender identity, race and ethnicity, and clinical practice status. These findings highlight the importance of clear, transparent workload policies and equitable assignment of responsibilities. Considering individual faculty roles and contributions to the overall program is crucial for improving perceived fairness and job satisfaction.