{"title":"MCH and Abortion: Towards a Stronger Relationship.","authors":"Deborah Allen, Marjorie R Sable, Trude Bennett","doi":"10.1007/s10995-025-04109-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The history of abortion rights in the US is long and contentious. Women have always had abortions, legal or not, and the legalization fight in recent history has been led by feminists. This paper tracks the course of that history through the Progressive Era of the first wave feminists, second wave feminism from the 1960s to the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision, the reactive period of trying to minimize the harm of abortion restrictions, and the consequences of the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision overthrowing Roe v. Wade. For each time period we ask who was leading the fight, how they framed their advocacy, who were their opponents and what arguments they used, and the extent to which maternal and child health (MCH) professionals and institutions engaged in the struggle. We offer recommendations for MCH practice going forward to (1) embrace women's health and health care as inseparable from infant, child, and family health, and abortion as central to women's physical and mental health; (2) build partnerships and coalitions among entities identified with MCH and those advocating reproductive rights, particularly abortion; (3) become voices for abortion as an essential part of MCH and public health; and (4) framing abortion as an equity issue. Women's judgment about the timing of their own childbearing and women's ability to act on that judgment improves maternal and child survival and wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1061-1073"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04109-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The history of abortion rights in the US is long and contentious. Women have always had abortions, legal or not, and the legalization fight in recent history has been led by feminists. This paper tracks the course of that history through the Progressive Era of the first wave feminists, second wave feminism from the 1960s to the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision, the reactive period of trying to minimize the harm of abortion restrictions, and the consequences of the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision overthrowing Roe v. Wade. For each time period we ask who was leading the fight, how they framed their advocacy, who were their opponents and what arguments they used, and the extent to which maternal and child health (MCH) professionals and institutions engaged in the struggle. We offer recommendations for MCH practice going forward to (1) embrace women's health and health care as inseparable from infant, child, and family health, and abortion as central to women's physical and mental health; (2) build partnerships and coalitions among entities identified with MCH and those advocating reproductive rights, particularly abortion; (3) become voices for abortion as an essential part of MCH and public health; and (4) framing abortion as an equity issue. Women's judgment about the timing of their own childbearing and women's ability to act on that judgment improves maternal and child survival and wellbeing.
在美国,堕胎权的历史漫长而充满争议。无论合法与否,女性一直都有堕胎的经历,而在最近的历史中,堕胎合法化的斗争一直是由女权主义者领导的。本文通过第一波女权主义的进步时代,从20世纪60年代到1973年Roe v. Wade最高法院判决的第二波女权主义,试图将堕胎限制的危害降到最低的反应期,以及2022年Dobbs v. Jackson妇女健康组织推翻Roe v. Wade案的决定的后果,跟踪了这段历史的进程。对于每一个时期,我们都询问是谁领导了这场斗争,他们是如何组织宣传的,谁是他们的对手,他们使用了什么论据,以及妇幼保健专业人员和机构在多大程度上参与了这场斗争。我们为妇幼保健实践提出以下建议:(1)将妇女健康和保健视为与婴儿、儿童和家庭健康不可分割的一部分,并将堕胎视为妇女身心健康的核心;(2)在妇幼保健实体和倡导生殖权利,特别是堕胎权利的实体之间建立伙伴关系和联盟;(3)成为堕胎的声音,作为妇幼保健和公共卫生的重要组成部分;(4)将堕胎视为一个公平问题。妇女对自己生育时间的判断以及妇女根据这种判断采取行动的能力提高了母婴的生存和福祉。
期刊介绍:
Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment
Innovative MCH service initiatives
Implementation of MCH programs
MCH policy analysis and advocacy
MCH professional development.
Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology.
Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.