Muscle regeneration is improved by hot water immersion but unchanged by cold following a simulated musculoskeletal injury in humans.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Valentin Dablainville, Adèle Mornas, Tom Normand-Gravier, Maha Al-Mulla, Emmanouil Papakostas, Bruno Olory, Theodorakys Marin Fermin, Frantzeska Zampeli, Nelda Nader, Marine Alhammoud, Freya Bayne, Anthony M J Sanchez, Marco Cardinale, Robin Candau, Henri Bernardi, Sébastien Racinais
{"title":"Muscle regeneration is improved by hot water immersion but unchanged by cold following a simulated musculoskeletal injury in humans.","authors":"Valentin Dablainville, Adèle Mornas, Tom Normand-Gravier, Maha Al-Mulla, Emmanouil Papakostas, Bruno Olory, Theodorakys Marin Fermin, Frantzeska Zampeli, Nelda Nader, Marine Alhammoud, Freya Bayne, Anthony M J Sanchez, Marco Cardinale, Robin Candau, Henri Bernardi, Sébastien Racinais","doi":"10.1113/JP287777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cryotherapy is a popular strategy for the treatment of skeletal muscle injuries. However, its effect on post-injury human muscle regeneration remains unclear. In contrast, promising results recently emerged using heat therapy to facilitate recovery from muscle injury. This study aimed to examine the effect of three different thermal treatments on muscle recovery and regeneration following a simulated injury in humans. Thirty-four participants underwent a muscle damage protocol induced by electrically stimulated eccentric contractions triggering regenerative processes following myofibre necrosis. Thereafter, participants were exposed to daily lower body water immersion for 10 days in cold (CWI, 15 min at 12°C), thermoneutral (TWI, 30 min at 32°C) or hot water immersion (HWI, 60 min at 42°C). Muscle biopsies were sampled before and at +5 (D5) and +11 (D11) days post-damage. None of the water immersions differed in recovery of force-generating capacity (P = 0.108). HWI induced a lower perceived muscle pain than TWI (P = 0.035) and lower levels of circulating creatine kinase (P ≤ 0.012) and myoglobin (P < 0.001) than TWI and CWI. Contrary to our hypothesis, CWI did not improve perceived muscle pain or reduce circulating markers of muscle damage (P ≥ 0.207). Expression of heat shock proteins 27 and 70 was significantly increased in HWI (P < 0.038) at D11 and appeared blunted using CWI. Furthermore, nuclear factor-κB expression significantly increased in all conditions except HWI, while interleukin-10 was upregulated only in HWI at D11 (P = 0.014). In conclusion, our results support the use of HWI but not cold, to improve muscle regeneration following an injury. KEY POINTS: Cryotherapy and heat therapy are popular strategies in the treatment of skeletal muscle injury; however, existing literature is equivocal, and their effects on human muscle regeneration remain unknown. We investigated the effect of three thermal treatments (cold water immersion (CWI): 15 min at 12°C; thermoneutral water immersion (TWI): 30 min at 32°C; or hot water immersion (HWI): 60 min at 42°C) performed daily for 10 days following electrically stimulated eccentric muscle damage inducing regenerative mechanisms. CWI did not improve chronic perceived muscle pain nor reduce circulating markers of muscle damage. HWI limited chronic perceived pain and circulating markers of muscle damage, potentially influenced inflammatory mechanisms, and increased the expression of heat shock proteins. HWI appears more beneficial than CWI in improving muscle regeneration after a muscle injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP287777","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cryotherapy is a popular strategy for the treatment of skeletal muscle injuries. However, its effect on post-injury human muscle regeneration remains unclear. In contrast, promising results recently emerged using heat therapy to facilitate recovery from muscle injury. This study aimed to examine the effect of three different thermal treatments on muscle recovery and regeneration following a simulated injury in humans. Thirty-four participants underwent a muscle damage protocol induced by electrically stimulated eccentric contractions triggering regenerative processes following myofibre necrosis. Thereafter, participants were exposed to daily lower body water immersion for 10 days in cold (CWI, 15 min at 12°C), thermoneutral (TWI, 30 min at 32°C) or hot water immersion (HWI, 60 min at 42°C). Muscle biopsies were sampled before and at +5 (D5) and +11 (D11) days post-damage. None of the water immersions differed in recovery of force-generating capacity (P = 0.108). HWI induced a lower perceived muscle pain than TWI (P = 0.035) and lower levels of circulating creatine kinase (P ≤ 0.012) and myoglobin (P < 0.001) than TWI and CWI. Contrary to our hypothesis, CWI did not improve perceived muscle pain or reduce circulating markers of muscle damage (P ≥ 0.207). Expression of heat shock proteins 27 and 70 was significantly increased in HWI (P < 0.038) at D11 and appeared blunted using CWI. Furthermore, nuclear factor-κB expression significantly increased in all conditions except HWI, while interleukin-10 was upregulated only in HWI at D11 (P = 0.014). In conclusion, our results support the use of HWI but not cold, to improve muscle regeneration following an injury. KEY POINTS: Cryotherapy and heat therapy are popular strategies in the treatment of skeletal muscle injury; however, existing literature is equivocal, and their effects on human muscle regeneration remain unknown. We investigated the effect of three thermal treatments (cold water immersion (CWI): 15 min at 12°C; thermoneutral water immersion (TWI): 30 min at 32°C; or hot water immersion (HWI): 60 min at 42°C) performed daily for 10 days following electrically stimulated eccentric muscle damage inducing regenerative mechanisms. CWI did not improve chronic perceived muscle pain nor reduce circulating markers of muscle damage. HWI limited chronic perceived pain and circulating markers of muscle damage, potentially influenced inflammatory mechanisms, and increased the expression of heat shock proteins. HWI appears more beneficial than CWI in improving muscle regeneration after a muscle injury.

在模拟人体肌肉骨骼损伤后,热水浸泡可以改善肌肉再生,但冷水浸泡没有改变。
冷冻疗法是治疗骨骼肌损伤的常用策略。然而,其对损伤后人体肌肉再生的影响尚不清楚。相比之下,最近出现了使用热疗法促进肌肉损伤恢复的有希望的结果。本研究旨在研究三种不同的热处理对模拟人体损伤后肌肉恢复和再生的影响。34名参与者接受了由电刺激偏心收缩诱发肌纤维坏死后再生过程引起的肌肉损伤方案。之后,参与者每天进行下体水浸泡10天,分别为冷水浸泡(CWI, 12°C 15分钟)、热中性水浸泡(TWI, 32°C 30分钟)或热水浸泡(HWI, 42°C 60分钟)。在损伤前和损伤后+5 (D5)和+11 (D11)天进行肌肉活检。两种水浸法在生力能力恢复方面无差异(P = 0.108)。HWI诱导的肌肉疼痛感低于TWI (P = 0.035),循环肌酸激酶(P≤0.012)和肌红蛋白水平低于TWI和CWI (P < 0.001)。与我们的假设相反,CWI并没有改善感知肌肉疼痛或减少肌肉损伤的循环标志物(P≥0.207)。热休克蛋白27和70的表达在D11时HWI组显著升高(P < 0.038),在CWI组表现为钝化。此外,除HWI外,核因子-κB在所有情况下表达均显著升高,而白细胞介素-10仅在HWI中在D11时表达上调(P = 0.014)。总之,我们的研究结果支持使用HWI而不是冷敷来改善损伤后的肌肉再生。重点:冷冻疗法和热疗法是骨骼肌损伤治疗的常用策略;然而,现有的文献是模棱两可的,它们对人体肌肉再生的影响仍然未知。我们研究了三种热处理(冷水浸泡(CWI):在12°C下浸泡15分钟;热中性水浸泡(TWI): 32℃下30min;或热水浸泡(HWI: 60分钟,42°C),在电刺激偏心肌损伤诱导再生机制后,每天进行10天。CWI没有改善慢性肌肉疼痛,也没有减少肌肉损伤的循环标志物。HWI限制慢性感知疼痛和肌肉损伤的循环标志物,可能影响炎症机制,并增加热休克蛋白的表达。在促进肌肉损伤后的肌肉再生方面,HWI似乎比CWI更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信