The Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Based on Dissection Skills if Structured Teaching and Standardized Surgery are Applied.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S513699
Andreas Martin Studer, Jörg Krebs, Christine Brambs, Corina Christmann-Schmid
{"title":"The Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Based on Dissection Skills if Structured Teaching and Standardized Surgery are Applied.","authors":"Andreas Martin Studer, Jörg Krebs, Christine Brambs, Corina Christmann-Schmid","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S513699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Teaching is an important but time- and resource-consuming process. Therefore, it is important to optimize and structure it effectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate if dry-lab suture and knotting training lead to stable theater performance. Consequently, the learning curve is supposed to be ascribed to only on-patient trainable skills like tissue preparation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>To test this hypothesis, a structured training and stepwise surgical program were implemented to perform laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (SCP) for urogynecological fellows adapting existing literature.The program was structured and recorded as following: dry-lab training weekly for knotting and suturing skills, assisting 20 SCP, stepwise overtaking defined steps under supervision including preparation of the dissecting planes anteriorly, posteriorly and at the level of the promontory, mesh fixation and retroperitoneal closure. All women opting for sacrocolpopexy as pelvic organ prolapse repair and being treated by one designated fellow were included without any specific selection. The only exclusion criterium was repeat sacrocolpopexy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within 45 procedures, the fellow reached a plateau of 80 minutes surgical time for SCP (excluding port-entry/-closure or concomitant interventions like hysterectomy or adnexectomy), with a complication rate of 11.1%. A high subjective and objective success rate was reported post-operatively. Differences in overall time were clearly correlated with overall dissection time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated that a stepwise, structured, and standardized intraoperative surgical program facilitated safe and efficient laparoscopic SCP performance in the analyzed situation. Off-patient trainable skills like suturing and knotting led to consistent mesh fixation times from the start of the qualification process and variation arose due to in situ learnable factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"917-925"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S513699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Teaching is an important but time- and resource-consuming process. Therefore, it is important to optimize and structure it effectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate if dry-lab suture and knotting training lead to stable theater performance. Consequently, the learning curve is supposed to be ascribed to only on-patient trainable skills like tissue preparation.

Patients and methods: To test this hypothesis, a structured training and stepwise surgical program were implemented to perform laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (SCP) for urogynecological fellows adapting existing literature.The program was structured and recorded as following: dry-lab training weekly for knotting and suturing skills, assisting 20 SCP, stepwise overtaking defined steps under supervision including preparation of the dissecting planes anteriorly, posteriorly and at the level of the promontory, mesh fixation and retroperitoneal closure. All women opting for sacrocolpopexy as pelvic organ prolapse repair and being treated by one designated fellow were included without any specific selection. The only exclusion criterium was repeat sacrocolpopexy.

Results: Within 45 procedures, the fellow reached a plateau of 80 minutes surgical time for SCP (excluding port-entry/-closure or concomitant interventions like hysterectomy or adnexectomy), with a complication rate of 11.1%. A high subjective and objective success rate was reported post-operatively. Differences in overall time were clearly correlated with overall dissection time.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that a stepwise, structured, and standardized intraoperative surgical program facilitated safe and efficient laparoscopic SCP performance in the analyzed situation. Off-patient trainable skills like suturing and knotting led to consistent mesh fixation times from the start of the qualification process and variation arose due to in situ learnable factors.

基于解剖技巧的腹腔镜骶髋固定术的学习曲线:结构化教学和规范化手术。
教学目的:教学是一个重要但耗时耗力的过程。因此,对其进行有效的优化和构建是十分重要的。本研究的目的是评估是否干实验室缝合和打结训练导致稳定的戏剧表演。因此,学习曲线应该只归因于病人可训练的技能,如组织准备。患者和方法:为了验证这一假设,我们采用现有文献,对泌尿妇科研究员进行了结构化的培训和逐步的手术计划,以实施腹腔镜骶colpop固定术(SCP)。该计划的结构和记录如下:每周进行打结和缝合技能的干实验室培训,协助20个SCP,在监督下逐步完成规定的步骤,包括在前后和角状水平准备解剖平面,网状物固定和腹膜后闭合。所有选择骶colpop固定术作为盆腔器官脱垂修复并由一名指定医生治疗的妇女均被纳入研究,没有任何特定的选择。唯一的排除标准是重复骶髋固定术。结果:在45次手术中,患者达到了80分钟的SCP手术时间平台期(不包括入孔/关闭或伴随的子宫切除术或附件切除术),并发症发生率为11.1%。术后主客观成功率均较高。总时间的差异与总解剖时间明显相关。结论:我们证明,在分析的情况下,逐步、结构化和标准化的术中手术方案有助于安全、有效地执行腹腔镜SCP。非患者可训练的技能,如缝合和打结,从鉴定过程开始就导致了一致的网状固定时间,并且由于原位可学习因素而产生了变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信