"I Delivered With a Team Where I Recognized No One": Understanding Depersonalization of Healthcare Through Women's Birth Stories.

IF 1.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Susanna Foxworthy Scott, Nicole L Johnson, Jennifer J Bute, Maria Brann, Darla Imhausen-Slaughter
{"title":"\"I Delivered With a Team Where I Recognized No One\": Understanding Depersonalization of Healthcare Through Women's Birth Stories.","authors":"Susanna Foxworthy Scott, Nicole L Johnson, Jennifer J Bute, Maria Brann, Darla Imhausen-Slaughter","doi":"10.1007/s10912-025-09957-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic brought significant changes to obstetric care, leading to decreased interactions, heightened medical interventions, and restricted support for birthing individuals, which in turn increased the risk of maternal and infant health concerns. This study investigated how birth stories from individuals who gave birth during the pandemic reflected their relational orientation toward healthcare providers, using Martin Buber's I-It and I-Thou framework and Davis-Floyd's technocratic model of birth as analytical lenses. Based on a phronetic iterative approach, data were gathered at three time points from surveys, focus groups, and interviews with 50 participants. Results revealed that birth narratives often reflected an I-It orientation, with healthcare providers described impersonally as a collective \"they.\" Experiences were characterized by strict protocols, information control, and isolation, forming the mechanized birth. In contrast, stories involving meaningful interpersonal connections with healthcare providers illustrated the preservation of a \"normal\" birth experience and revealed the dialogical nature of birth and I-Thou orientation, in which relational, humanized care emerged despite pandemic restrictions. Findings emphasize the need for relationship-centered care that prioritizes patient individuality, humanity, and rights, even in times of crisis. Healthcare providers and policymakers should consider balancing technological efficiency with holistic, humanistic medicine, and consider how post-pandemic obstetric care can incorporate philosophical and ethical principles that prioritize relational aspects of birth for improved maternal and infant outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45518,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-025-09957-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic brought significant changes to obstetric care, leading to decreased interactions, heightened medical interventions, and restricted support for birthing individuals, which in turn increased the risk of maternal and infant health concerns. This study investigated how birth stories from individuals who gave birth during the pandemic reflected their relational orientation toward healthcare providers, using Martin Buber's I-It and I-Thou framework and Davis-Floyd's technocratic model of birth as analytical lenses. Based on a phronetic iterative approach, data were gathered at three time points from surveys, focus groups, and interviews with 50 participants. Results revealed that birth narratives often reflected an I-It orientation, with healthcare providers described impersonally as a collective "they." Experiences were characterized by strict protocols, information control, and isolation, forming the mechanized birth. In contrast, stories involving meaningful interpersonal connections with healthcare providers illustrated the preservation of a "normal" birth experience and revealed the dialogical nature of birth and I-Thou orientation, in which relational, humanized care emerged despite pandemic restrictions. Findings emphasize the need for relationship-centered care that prioritizes patient individuality, humanity, and rights, even in times of crisis. Healthcare providers and policymakers should consider balancing technological efficiency with holistic, humanistic medicine, and consider how post-pandemic obstetric care can incorporate philosophical and ethical principles that prioritize relational aspects of birth for improved maternal and infant outcomes.

“我和一个我不认识的团队一起分娩”:通过妇女的分娩故事了解医疗保健的去人格化。
2019冠状病毒病大流行给产科护理带来了重大变化,导致相互作用减少,医疗干预措施加强,对分娩个体的支持有限,这反过来又增加了孕产妇和婴儿健康问题的风险。本研究调查了在大流行期间分娩的个体的分娩故事如何反映他们对医疗保健提供者的关系取向,使用马丁·布伯的“我-它和我-你”框架和戴维斯-弗洛伊德的出生技术官僚模型作为分析透镜。基于快速迭代的方法,从调查、焦点小组和对50名参与者的访谈中收集了三个时间点的数据。结果显示,出生叙述往往反映了一种“我-它”的取向,医疗服务提供者被客观地描述为一个集体的“他们”。经验的特点是严格的协议,信息控制和隔离,形成机械化分娩。相比之下,涉及与医疗保健提供者之间有意义的人际关系的故事说明了对“正常”分娩经历的保留,并揭示了分娩和我-你取向的对话性质,在这种情况下,尽管受到流行病的限制,关系的、人性化的护理出现了。研究结果强调需要以关系为中心的护理,优先考虑患者的个性,人性和权利,即使在危机时期。医疗保健提供者和决策者应考虑在技术效率与整体人文医学之间取得平衡,并考虑如何在大流行后的产科护理中纳入哲学和伦理原则,优先考虑分娩的关系方面,以改善母婴结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Humanities
Journal of Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Humanities publishes original papers that reflect its enlarged focus on interdisciplinary inquiry in medicine and medical education. Such inquiry can emerge in the following ways: (1) from the medical humanities, which includes literature, history, philosophy, and bioethics as well as those areas of the social and behavioral sciences that have strong humanistic traditions; (2) from cultural studies, a multidisciplinary activity involving the humanities; women''s, African-American, and other critical studies; media studies and popular culture; and sociology and anthropology, which can be used to examine medical institutions, practice and education with a special focus on relations of power; and (3) from pedagogical perspectives that elucidate what and how knowledge is made and valued in medicine, how that knowledge is expressed and transmitted, and the ideological basis of medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信