Comparative evaluation of bonding failure rate with two light cure orthodontic adhesives: a cross-arch split-mouth prospective study.

Q2 Medicine

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e2524214.oar

Dhruv Jain, Sukhbir Singh Chopra, Vivek Kumar Thakur, Surendra Kumar Sewda

{"title":"Comparative evaluation of bonding failure rate with two light cure orthodontic adhesives: a cross-arch split-mouth prospective study.","authors":"Dhruv Jain, Sukhbir Singh Chopra, Vivek Kumar Thakur, Surendra Kumar Sewda","doi":"10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e2524214.oar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Continuous improvements in the field of adhesive dentistry have led to the introduction of various materials that have the potential to be used as orthodontic adhesives. One such light-cure orthodontic adhesive is the U-Bond™ Ortho, which clinically exhibits optimum bonding strength.Objective: The aim of this cross-arch split-mouth prospective study was to evaluate the bonding failure rate along with the bracket survival time of U-Bond™ Ortho as compared with Transbond™ XT adhesive material, over an observation period of six months.Material and methods: 36 consecutive patients (16 males and 20 females; mean age 22.44 years) fulfilling the selection criteria were included in the study. A total of 720 brackets were bonded equally using Transbond™ XT and U-Bond™ adhesive, which were analyzed for bracket failure rate, using the Chi-square test or Fischer test, and mean bracket survival time using Kaplan-Meier analysis.Results: The overall bracket failure rate was 3.6% (2.8% and 4.4% for Transbond™ XT and U-Bond™ respectively). The results were statistically non-significant when both adhesive materials were compared for differences in bonding failure rate and mean bracket survival time in the maxillary and mandibular arches, and anterior and posterior segments, although gender-based differences were statistically significant.Conclusion: Both Transbond™ XT and U-Bond™ Ortho exhibited similar clinically acceptable performances in terms of bonding failure rate and bracket survival time.","PeriodicalId":38720,"journal":{"name":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"30 2","pages":"e2524214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e2524214.oar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Continuous improvements in the field of adhesive dentistry have led to the introduction of various materials that have the potential to be used as orthodontic adhesives. One such light-cure orthodontic adhesive is the U-Bond™ Ortho, which clinically exhibits optimum bonding strength.

Objective: The aim of this cross-arch split-mouth prospective study was to evaluate the bonding failure rate along with the bracket survival time of U-Bond™ Ortho as compared with Transbond™ XT adhesive material, over an observation period of six months.

Material and methods: 36 consecutive patients (16 males and 20 females; mean age 22.44 years) fulfilling the selection criteria were included in the study. A total of 720 brackets were bonded equally using Transbond™ XT and U-Bond™ adhesive, which were analyzed for bracket failure rate, using the Chi-square test or Fischer test, and mean bracket survival time using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: The overall bracket failure rate was 3.6% (2.8% and 4.4% for Transbond™ XT and U-Bond™ respectively). The results were statistically non-significant when both adhesive materials were compared for differences in bonding failure rate and mean bracket survival time in the maxillary and mandibular arches, and anterior and posterior segments, although gender-based differences were statistically significant.

Conclusion: Both Transbond™ XT and U-Bond™ Ortho exhibited similar clinically acceptable performances in terms of bonding failure rate and bracket survival time.

查看原文本刊更多论文

两种光固化正畸粘接剂粘接失败率的比较评价：一项交叉弓裂口的前瞻性研究。

简介：粘合剂牙科领域的不断改进导致了各种材料的引入，这些材料有可能被用作正畸粘合剂。其中一种光固化正畸胶粘剂是U-Bond™Ortho，它在临床上表现出最佳的粘合强度。目的：本前瞻性研究的目的是评估U-Bond™Ortho与Transbond™XT粘接剂材料在6个月的观察期内的粘接失败率和托槽存活时间。材料与方法：连续36例患者(男16例，女20例；平均年龄22.44岁)，符合入选标准。使用Transbond™XT和U-Bond™粘合剂将720个托槽均匀粘合，使用卡方检验或Fischer检验分析托槽故障率，使用Kaplan-Meier分析平均托槽存活时间。结果：总体托架故障率为3.6% （Transbond™XT和U-Bond™分别为2.8%和4.4%）。两种粘接剂材料在上颌和下颌弓以及前后节的粘接失败率和平均托槽存活时间上的差异比较，结果无统计学意义，尽管基于性别的差异有统计学意义。结论：Transbond™XT和U-Bond™Ortho在粘接失败率和托槽存活时间方面具有相似的临床可接受性能。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

27 weeks

期刊介绍： The Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics publishes scientific research articles, significant reviews, clinical and technical case reports, brief communications, and other materials related to Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics.