Cumulative exposure to childhood adversity and risk of adult psychosis: a dose-response meta-analysis.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Aidan Flinn, Rebecca Hefferman-Clarke, Sophie Parker, Kate Allsopp, Lan Zhou, Marieke Begemann, Richard Bentall, Filippo Varese
{"title":"Cumulative exposure to childhood adversity and risk of adult psychosis: a dose-response meta-analysis.","authors":"Aidan Flinn, Rebecca Hefferman-Clarke, Sophie Parker, Kate Allsopp, Lan Zhou, Marieke Begemann, Richard Bentall, Filippo Varese","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725001138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Past meta-analyses have confirmed robust associations between childhood traumatic experiences and the risk of psychosis. However, the dose-response relationship between cumulative adversity exposure and psychosis risk observed in some, but not all, previous studies in this area has not been specifically scrutinized or substantiated via recommended meta-analytic methods. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the available evidence on dose-response effects between childhood trauma and psychosis outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, and WANFANG were searched from inception to July 2024 to identify observational studies reporting odds ratios for psychosis outcomes across multiple levels of childhood trauma exposure. Dose-response effects were extracted from eligible studies and synthesized via robust error meta-regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies comprising 59,975 participants were included in the meta-analysis. A significant nonlinear relationship was observed between the number of childhood adversities and the risk of future psychosis experiences (<i>p</i> for nonlinearity = .021). The pooled odds ratio for psychosis increased from 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-2.22) for 1 exposure to 6.46 (95% CI: 4.37-9.53) for 5+ exposures compared to no traumatic experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis provides robust evidence for a dose-response relationship between cumulative childhood adversity and psychosis risk, with nonlinear patterns suggestive of an accelerating, more pronounced, risk at higher levels of trauma exposure. These findings underscore the importance of considering childhood traumatic experiences as a putative and potentially causative risk factor for psychotic experiences, as well as early prevention and intervention efforts targeting childhood adversity to reduce the risk of psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e162"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725001138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Past meta-analyses have confirmed robust associations between childhood traumatic experiences and the risk of psychosis. However, the dose-response relationship between cumulative adversity exposure and psychosis risk observed in some, but not all, previous studies in this area has not been specifically scrutinized or substantiated via recommended meta-analytic methods. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the available evidence on dose-response effects between childhood trauma and psychosis outcomes.

Methods: PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, and WANFANG were searched from inception to July 2024 to identify observational studies reporting odds ratios for psychosis outcomes across multiple levels of childhood trauma exposure. Dose-response effects were extracted from eligible studies and synthesized via robust error meta-regression analyses.

Results: Twenty-one studies comprising 59,975 participants were included in the meta-analysis. A significant nonlinear relationship was observed between the number of childhood adversities and the risk of future psychosis experiences (p for nonlinearity = .021). The pooled odds ratio for psychosis increased from 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-2.22) for 1 exposure to 6.46 (95% CI: 4.37-9.53) for 5+ exposures compared to no traumatic experience.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides robust evidence for a dose-response relationship between cumulative childhood adversity and psychosis risk, with nonlinear patterns suggestive of an accelerating, more pronounced, risk at higher levels of trauma exposure. These findings underscore the importance of considering childhood traumatic experiences as a putative and potentially causative risk factor for psychotic experiences, as well as early prevention and intervention efforts targeting childhood adversity to reduce the risk of psychosis.

儿童期逆境累积暴露与成年精神病风险:一项剂量-反应荟萃分析。
背景:过去的荟萃分析已经证实了童年创伤经历与精神病风险之间的密切联系。然而,累积逆境暴露与精神病风险之间的剂量-反应关系在一些(但不是全部)先前的研究中观察到,该领域尚未通过推荐的荟萃分析方法进行专门审查或证实。本荟萃分析旨在综合儿童创伤与精神病预后之间剂量反应效应的现有证据。方法:检索PsycINFO、PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、CNKI和万方网,从成立到2024年7月,以确定观察性研究报告了不同程度的儿童创伤暴露的精神病结局的优势比。从符合条件的研究中提取剂量-反应效应,并通过稳健误差荟萃回归分析综合。结果:21项研究包括59,975名参与者被纳入meta分析。观察到童年逆境的数量与未来精神病经历的风险之间存在显著的非线性关系(非线性p = 0.021)。与无创伤经历相比,1次暴露的精神病合并优势比从1.76(95%可信区间[CI]: 1.39-2.22)增加到5次以上暴露的6.46(95%可信区间[CI]: 4.37-9.53)。结论:这项荟萃分析为累积童年逆境和精神病风险之间的剂量-反应关系提供了有力的证据,非线性模式表明创伤暴露水平越高,风险越明显。这些发现强调了将童年创伤经历视为精神病经历的假定和潜在致病风险因素的重要性,以及针对童年逆境进行早期预防和干预以降低精神病风险的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信