Using isolation-by-distance to jointly estimate effective population density and dispersal distance: a practical evaluation using bumble bees.

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Dylan T Simpson
{"title":"Using isolation-by-distance to jointly estimate effective population density and dispersal distance: a practical evaluation using bumble bees.","authors":"Dylan T Simpson","doi":"10.1007/s00442-025-05721-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective population density and intergenerational dispersal distance are key aspects of population biology, but obtaining empirical estimates of these parameters can be difficult. This is especially true for my study taxa, wild bees. In this paper, I apply and evaluate an existing but underutilized method to estimate effective density and dispersal distance of bumble bees (Bombus, Apidae). Specifically, using 10 datasets of bumble bees in North America, I use the relationship between genetic isolation-by-distance and Wright's neighborhood size to define a density-dispersal isocline-that is, a curve describing pairs of density and dispersal values consistent with observed rates of isolation-by-distance. These parameters are inversely related; as one increases the other decreases. I then use outside estimates of bumble bee dispersal distances to make more specific estimates of effective colony density. Compared to some prior estimates of census density (100s to 1000s colonies/km<sup>2</sup>), my estimated effective colony densities were very low (1-41 effective colonies/km<sup>2</sup>). I also hypothesize, however, that these estimates are affected by the spatial extent of sampling, due to scale-dependent patterns in the distribution of individuals. To test this hypothesis, I subsampled each dataset to simulate varying study extent, and repeated my analysis. Within populations, effective densities tended to decrease when measured across larger spatial extents. Altogether, I demonstrate a useful and under-appreciated tool for studying population biology, especially of small, mobile animals like bees, but also show that researchers must interpret their results carefully within the context of their study design.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"207 6","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05721-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective population density and intergenerational dispersal distance are key aspects of population biology, but obtaining empirical estimates of these parameters can be difficult. This is especially true for my study taxa, wild bees. In this paper, I apply and evaluate an existing but underutilized method to estimate effective density and dispersal distance of bumble bees (Bombus, Apidae). Specifically, using 10 datasets of bumble bees in North America, I use the relationship between genetic isolation-by-distance and Wright's neighborhood size to define a density-dispersal isocline-that is, a curve describing pairs of density and dispersal values consistent with observed rates of isolation-by-distance. These parameters are inversely related; as one increases the other decreases. I then use outside estimates of bumble bee dispersal distances to make more specific estimates of effective colony density. Compared to some prior estimates of census density (100s to 1000s colonies/km2), my estimated effective colony densities were very low (1-41 effective colonies/km2). I also hypothesize, however, that these estimates are affected by the spatial extent of sampling, due to scale-dependent patterns in the distribution of individuals. To test this hypothesis, I subsampled each dataset to simulate varying study extent, and repeated my analysis. Within populations, effective densities tended to decrease when measured across larger spatial extents. Altogether, I demonstrate a useful and under-appreciated tool for studying population biology, especially of small, mobile animals like bees, but also show that researchers must interpret their results carefully within the context of their study design.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用距离隔离法联合估计有效种群密度和扩散距离:用大黄蜂进行的实用评估。
有效种群密度和代际扩散距离是种群生物学的关键方面,但获得这些参数的经验估计可能是困难的。对于我研究的分类群——野生蜜蜂来说,尤其如此。本文采用一种现有但未充分利用的方法来估算大黄蜂(Bombus, Apidae)的有效密度和传播距离。具体地说,我使用了北美10个大黄蜂的数据集,利用遗传距离隔离和赖特邻居大小之间的关系来定义密度-扩散等斜线——也就是说,一条描述密度和扩散值对的曲线,与观察到的距离隔离率一致。这些参数呈负相关;一个增加,另一个减少。然后,我利用外界对大黄蜂传播距离的估计,对有效群体密度做出更具体的估计。与一些先前的人口普查密度估计(100到1000个菌落/平方公里)相比,我估计的有效菌落密度非常低(1-41个有效菌落/平方公里)。然而,我也假设,由于个体分布的尺度依赖模式,这些估计受到抽样的空间范围的影响。为了验证这一假设,我对每个数据集进行了抽样,以模拟不同的研究范围,并重复了我的分析。在种群内,当在更大的空间范围内测量时,有效密度趋于降低。总之,我展示了一种有用但不被重视的工具,用于研究种群生物学,特别是像蜜蜂这样的小型移动动物,但也表明研究人员必须在研究设计的背景下仔细解释他们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信