Are current laparoscopic common bile duct exploration simulators suitably designed to capture the complexity of the technique? A review of the literature and evaluation of those available.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Mohamed Aburrous, Marine Shao, Benjy Bailey, Charlotte Clark, Michael G Clarke, Ian Finlay, Allwyn Cota, James Clark
{"title":"Are current laparoscopic common bile duct exploration simulators suitably designed to capture the complexity of the technique? A review of the literature and evaluation of those available.","authors":"Mohamed Aburrous, Marine Shao, Benjy Bailey, Charlotte Clark, Michael G Clarke, Ian Finlay, Allwyn Cota, James Clark","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2509220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whilst endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains the main line of treatment for choledocholithiasis, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) offers a single-stage procedure and reduced hospital stay, cost and pressure on ERCP. However, LCBDE is a demanding technique that requires training in order to master, which could be achieved through simulation. The aim of this study was to highlight the suitability of currently available LCBDE simulators for surgical training and evaluate their practicality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Database search included Embase and Medline as well as grey literature for LCBDE simulation and training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine dedicated simulators were identified to train on LCBDE. Five simulators were validated, of which only three are commercially available and only one model could train on laparoscopic ultrasound using augmented reality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most identified LCBDE simulators are meeting basic criteria to train on the procedure steps. Synthetic models have been shown to improve training and operative performance in addition to shortening learning curves, many at low cost, especially when used within a constructed surgical curriculum program. However, more investment in development and implementation is required to meet the growing need, including training on laparoscopic ultrasound. Only one primitive virtual reality-based simulator was identified and did not meet the criteria for training.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2025.2509220","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whilst endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains the main line of treatment for choledocholithiasis, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) offers a single-stage procedure and reduced hospital stay, cost and pressure on ERCP. However, LCBDE is a demanding technique that requires training in order to master, which could be achieved through simulation. The aim of this study was to highlight the suitability of currently available LCBDE simulators for surgical training and evaluate their practicality.

Methods: Database search included Embase and Medline as well as grey literature for LCBDE simulation and training.

Results: Nine dedicated simulators were identified to train on LCBDE. Five simulators were validated, of which only three are commercially available and only one model could train on laparoscopic ultrasound using augmented reality.

Conclusions: Most identified LCBDE simulators are meeting basic criteria to train on the procedure steps. Synthetic models have been shown to improve training and operative performance in addition to shortening learning curves, many at low cost, especially when used within a constructed surgical curriculum program. However, more investment in development and implementation is required to meet the growing need, including training on laparoscopic ultrasound. Only one primitive virtual reality-based simulator was identified and did not meet the criteria for training.

目前的腹腔镜胆总管探查模拟器是否适合用于捕捉该技术的复杂性?回顾文献并对现有文献进行评价。
背景:虽然内窥镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)仍然是治疗胆总管结石的主要方法,但腹腔镜胆总管探查(LCBDE)提供了单阶段手术,减少了住院时间、费用和ERCP的压力。然而,LCBDE是一项要求很高的技术,需要经过训练才能掌握,这可以通过模拟来实现。本研究的目的是强调目前可用的LCBDE模拟器在外科训练中的适用性,并评估其实用性。方法:检索Embase和Medline数据库以及LCBDE模拟和培训的灰色文献。结果:确定了9个专用模拟器进行LCBDE训练。五个模拟器进行了验证,其中只有三个是商用的,只有一个模型可以使用增强现实进行腹腔镜超声训练。结论:大多数确定的LCBDE模拟器满足基本标准,以培训的程序步骤。除了缩短学习曲线外,合成模型已被证明可以改善训练和手术表现,许多模型成本低,特别是在构建的外科课程计划中使用时。然而,需要在开发和实施方面进行更多的投资,以满足日益增长的需求,包括腹腔镜超声培训。只识别了一个原始的虚拟现实模拟器,不符合训练标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies (MITAT) is an international forum for endoscopic surgeons, interventional radiologists and industrial instrument manufacturers. It is the official journal of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT) whose membership includes representatives from a broad spectrum of medical specialities, instrument manufacturing and research. The journal brings the latest developments and innovations in minimally invasive therapy to its readers. What makes Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies unique is that we publish one or two special issues each year, which are devoted to a specific theme. Key topics covered by the journal include: interventional radiology, endoscopic surgery, imaging technology, manipulators and robotics for surgery and education and training for MIS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信