Influence of combined oral contraceptive pill before PPOS protocol on egg donors and recipients' outcomes: an international multicenter retrospective study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Sara Maggi, Silvia Bontà, Antonio Forgiarini, Greet Lammens, Simona Franzò, Giulia Zamagni, Lodovico Parmegiani, Gabriella Zito, Giuseppe Ricci, Luis Alberto Quintero Espinel
{"title":"Influence of combined oral contraceptive pill before PPOS protocol on egg donors and recipients' outcomes: an international multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Sara Maggi, Silvia Bontà, Antonio Forgiarini, Greet Lammens, Simona Franzò, Giulia Zamagni, Lodovico Parmegiani, Gabriella Zito, Giuseppe Ricci, Luis Alberto Quintero Espinel","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03519-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate whether using a combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) pre-treatment before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) may negatively influence ovarian response in donors and treatments outcomes in recipients when a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol is used in oocyte donation treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluating outcomes of 397 COH cycles in oocyte donors, with and without COCP pre-treatment. The retrieved oocytes were used for 216 oocyte donation cycles in recipients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In donors, the No-COCP group obtained a higher number of total, MII, and useful oocytes, similar stimulation days, total FSH dose used, and cancellation rate due to low response, while the COCP group showed significantly higher cancellations for low LH levels, indicative of long-lasting pituitary suppression COCP related. In recipients, both groups showed similar fertilization rate and blastocyst formation rate. Miscarriage rate (MR) was significantly higher in the COCP group, while higher implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), and live birth rate (LBR) were obtained in the No-COCP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Donor response to COH with PPOS protocol appears to be negatively influenced by COCP pre-treatment, with implications for oocyte donation treatment outcomes in recipients, including higher MR and lower OPR/LBR. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03519-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate whether using a combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) pre-treatment before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) may negatively influence ovarian response in donors and treatments outcomes in recipients when a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol is used in oocyte donation treatments.

Methods: Multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluating outcomes of 397 COH cycles in oocyte donors, with and without COCP pre-treatment. The retrieved oocytes were used for 216 oocyte donation cycles in recipients.

Results: In donors, the No-COCP group obtained a higher number of total, MII, and useful oocytes, similar stimulation days, total FSH dose used, and cancellation rate due to low response, while the COCP group showed significantly higher cancellations for low LH levels, indicative of long-lasting pituitary suppression COCP related. In recipients, both groups showed similar fertilization rate and blastocyst formation rate. Miscarriage rate (MR) was significantly higher in the COCP group, while higher implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), and live birth rate (LBR) were obtained in the No-COCP group.

Conclusions: Donor response to COH with PPOS protocol appears to be negatively influenced by COCP pre-treatment, with implications for oocyte donation treatment outcomes in recipients, including higher MR and lower OPR/LBR. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

PPOS方案前联合口服避孕药对卵子供体和受者结局的影响:一项国际多中心回顾性研究
目的:本研究旨在评估在控制性卵巢过度刺激(COH)前使用联合口服避孕药(COCP)是否会对供体卵巢反应和受体治疗结果产生负面影响,当孕激素卵巢刺激(PPOS)方案用于卵母细胞捐赠治疗时。方法:多中心回顾性队列研究,评估397例卵母细胞供体COH周期的结果,前后分别进行COCP预处理。获得的卵母细胞用于216个卵母细胞捐赠周期。结果:在供体中,No-COCP组获得了更高的总卵母细胞数量、MII和有用卵母细胞数量、相似的刺激天数、使用的FSH总剂量和低反应导致的取消率,而COCP组因低LH水平而显着更高的取消率,表明长期垂体抑制COCP相关。在受体中,两组受精率和囊胚形成率相似。COCP组的流产率(MR)明显高于对照组,而No-COCP组的着床率、持续妊娠率(OPR)和活产率(LBR)均高于对照组。结论:采用PPOS方案的供体对COH的反应似乎受到COCP预处理的负面影响,这对受者的卵母细胞捐赠治疗结果有影响,包括更高的MR和更低的OPR/LBR。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信