Risk of Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia After Colonoscopy in Patients With Different Index Findings.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kai Song, Shengyu Zhang, Jiahui Luo, Bin Lu, Jianing Li, Yueyang Zhou, Yuqing Chen, Yuelun Zhang, Aiming Yang, Hongda Chen, Dong Wu
{"title":"Risk of Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia After Colonoscopy in Patients With Different Index Findings.","authors":"Kai Song, Shengyu Zhang, Jiahui Luo, Bin Lu, Jianing Li, Yueyang Zhou, Yuqing Chen, Yuelun Zhang, Aiming Yang, Hongda Chen, Dong Wu","doi":"10.1111/jgh.17026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients undergoing colonoscopy are at risk of developing metachronous advanced neoplasia (AN). This study explores risk factors of metachronous AN and refines risk stratification based on different index findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing multiple colonoscopies performed by experienced endoscopists at a major tertiary hospital in China in 2012-2023. Cox regression, adjusted for covariates, estimated the risk of metachronous AN. Cumulative hazard was determined using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Multiple sensitivity analyses validated the impact of risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3638 patients was included. In the index nonadvanced adenoma (NAA) group, covariate-adjusted Cox regression showed proximal adenomas (hazard ratio [HR], 2.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-7.44), adenomas ≥ 6 mm (HR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.49-7.26), and ≥ 3 adenomas (stratified by time horizons: HR, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.25-13.10) were associated with increased risk of metachronous AN. In the group with non-significant findings at index colonoscopy, age ≥ 50 years (HR, 2.19; 95% CI: 1.36-3.51), family history of colorectal cancer (HR: 5.55; 95% CI: 2.96-10.44), and male sex (HR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.61-3.73) were associated with increased risk of metachronous AN. Survival analysis revealed that patients with these risk factors reached reference risk for developing metachronous AN much earlier.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on a Chinese population, we identified independent risk factors for metachronous AN across different baseline diagnostic subgroups, facilitating personalized risk stratification for high-risk patients. Risk profiles should be considered when defining the optimal surveillance interval for colonoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.17026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patients undergoing colonoscopy are at risk of developing metachronous advanced neoplasia (AN). This study explores risk factors of metachronous AN and refines risk stratification based on different index findings.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing multiple colonoscopies performed by experienced endoscopists at a major tertiary hospital in China in 2012-2023. Cox regression, adjusted for covariates, estimated the risk of metachronous AN. Cumulative hazard was determined using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Multiple sensitivity analyses validated the impact of risk factors.

Results: A total of 3638 patients was included. In the index nonadvanced adenoma (NAA) group, covariate-adjusted Cox regression showed proximal adenomas (hazard ratio [HR], 2.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-7.44), adenomas ≥ 6 mm (HR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.49-7.26), and ≥ 3 adenomas (stratified by time horizons: HR, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.25-13.10) were associated with increased risk of metachronous AN. In the group with non-significant findings at index colonoscopy, age ≥ 50 years (HR, 2.19; 95% CI: 1.36-3.51), family history of colorectal cancer (HR: 5.55; 95% CI: 2.96-10.44), and male sex (HR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.61-3.73) were associated with increased risk of metachronous AN. Survival analysis revealed that patients with these risk factors reached reference risk for developing metachronous AN much earlier.

Conclusions: Based on a Chinese population, we identified independent risk factors for metachronous AN across different baseline diagnostic subgroups, facilitating personalized risk stratification for high-risk patients. Risk profiles should be considered when defining the optimal surveillance interval for colonoscopy.

不同指标发现患者结肠镜检查后异时性晚期肿瘤的风险。
目的:接受结肠镜检查的患者有发生异时性晚期肿瘤(AN)的风险。本研究探讨异时性心肌炎的危险因素,并根据不同的指标结果,细化风险分层。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入2012-2023年在中国某大型三级医院由经验丰富的内窥镜医师进行多次结肠镜检查的患者。Cox回归,调整协变量,估计异时性AN的风险。累积危险度采用Kaplan-Meier估计确定。多重敏感性分析验证了危险因素的影响。结果:共纳入3638例患者。在指数非晚期腺瘤(NAA)组,协变量校正Cox回归显示近端腺瘤(风险比[HR], 2.99;95%可信区间[CI], 1.20-7.44),腺瘤≥6 mm (HR, 3.29;95% CI, 1.49-7.26),≥3个腺瘤(按时间分层:HR, 4.05;95% CI, 1.25-13.10)与异时性AN风险增加相关。在指数结肠镜检查无显著结果的组中,年龄≥50岁(HR, 2.19;95% CI: 1.36-3.51),结直肠癌家族史(HR: 5.55;95% CI: 2.96-10.44),男性(HR: 2.45;95% CI: 1.61-3.73)与异时性AN风险增加相关。生存分析显示,具有这些危险因素的患者更早达到发生异时性AN的参考风险。结论:基于中国人群,我们在不同基线诊断亚组中确定了异时性AN的独立危险因素,促进了高危患者的个性化风险分层。在确定结肠镜检查的最佳监测间隔时,应考虑风险概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信