{"title":"Effects of Pemafibrate on Cholesterol Synthesis and Absorption: a Post-Hoc Subgroup Analysis of a Phase 2 Clinical Trial.","authors":"Shizuya Yamashita, Eiichi Araki, Hidenori Arai, Koutaro Yokote, Ryohei Tanigawa, Ayumi Saito, Hideki Suganami, Sara Minamikawa, Shun Ishibashi","doi":"10.5551/jat.65707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Recently, we reported that a pemafibrate extended-release (XR) formulation lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers in a phase 2 clinical pharmacology study. Here we describe our post-hoc analysis of that study, discuss the mechanism by which pemafibrate lowers LDL-C, and suggest which patients may respond favorably to pemafibrate treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the phase 2 study, patients with hypertriglyceridemia received treatment with pemafibrate immediate-release (IR) 0.2 mg/day or XR 0.4 mg/day or 0.8 mg/day. This post-hoc subgroup analysis examined the percentage change in LDL-C, apolipoprotein B (ApoB), non-HDL-C, and cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers, in subgroups by baseline LDL-C, and then determined the correlation between the percentage change in LDL-C and the percentage change in cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis included 60 patients who received two of three formulations of the drug. A total of 78.3% (47/60) were male, 16.7% (10/60) had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 10% (6/60) received concomitant statins. The percentage of LDL-C lowering was greater in the population with high baseline LDL-C, and similar trends were noted for the ApoB, non-HDL-C, and cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers. The percentage change in LDL-C was positively correlated with the percentage change in lathosterol, β-sitosterol, and campesterol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with hypertriglyceridemia, results suggested that pemafibrate lowered LDL-C by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis in the liver and cholesterol absorption from the intestinal tract. This lowering effect was greater in populations with higher baseline LDL-C.</p>","PeriodicalId":15128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.65707","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Recently, we reported that a pemafibrate extended-release (XR) formulation lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers in a phase 2 clinical pharmacology study. Here we describe our post-hoc analysis of that study, discuss the mechanism by which pemafibrate lowers LDL-C, and suggest which patients may respond favorably to pemafibrate treatment.
Methods: In the phase 2 study, patients with hypertriglyceridemia received treatment with pemafibrate immediate-release (IR) 0.2 mg/day or XR 0.4 mg/day or 0.8 mg/day. This post-hoc subgroup analysis examined the percentage change in LDL-C, apolipoprotein B (ApoB), non-HDL-C, and cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers, in subgroups by baseline LDL-C, and then determined the correlation between the percentage change in LDL-C and the percentage change in cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers.
Results: Our analysis included 60 patients who received two of three formulations of the drug. A total of 78.3% (47/60) were male, 16.7% (10/60) had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 10% (6/60) received concomitant statins. The percentage of LDL-C lowering was greater in the population with high baseline LDL-C, and similar trends were noted for the ApoB, non-HDL-C, and cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers. The percentage change in LDL-C was positively correlated with the percentage change in lathosterol, β-sitosterol, and campesterol.
Conclusions: In patients with hypertriglyceridemia, results suggested that pemafibrate lowered LDL-C by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis in the liver and cholesterol absorption from the intestinal tract. This lowering effect was greater in populations with higher baseline LDL-C.