{"title":"Optimization of Agricultural Crop Pattern Based on water Footprint Methodology.","authors":"Muhammed Sungur Demir, Abdullah Muratoglu","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjaf063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Agricultural activities account for the majority of global freshwater consumption, prompting extensive research into strategies for reducing water demand in the sector. Crop pattern optimization has emerged as a key strategy for achieving significant water savings. However, most existing studies prioritize yield maximization over minimizing water consumption. Additionally, water-based optimization efforts often rely on low temporal resolution data and rarely offer practical recommendations for crop pattern design. This study aims to evaluate water-saving potential in agriculture through crop pattern optimization based on water footprint (WF) assessments, focusing on the Ceyhan River Basin-an important hotspot for diverse crop production in Türkiye. The method effectively balances blue, green, and grey water components by integrating high-resolution spatial WF data from the SWAT hydrological model into a multi-objective optimization framework. We developed six scenarios: Scenario S1 prioritizes total WF reduction, while Scenario S6 focuses solely on blue WF, with intermediate scenarios representing linear blends of these priorities. The results show that scenario S1 achieves a 23.4% reduction in total WF (614 million m³)-comparable to the annual wheat consumption of 1.8 million people-whereas scenario S6 attains a 47.9% decrease in blue WF (464 million m³), potentially meeting the daily water needs of 5.6 million individuals. Notably, an intermediate scenario (S5) provides a balanced reduction across WF components with a more uniform crop distribution, enhancing its practical appeal. Recognizing that farmer practices and economic concerns may hinder implementation, we recommend establishing targeted incentive mechanisms-such as financial support for farmers who adopt optimized cropping patterns-to facilitate the transition toward water-efficient practices. Overall, this research offers a robust decision-support tool for policymakers and water resource managers, providing clear guidance for aligning agricultural practices with sustainable water management and enhancing food and water security in water-scarce regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Agricultural activities account for the majority of global freshwater consumption, prompting extensive research into strategies for reducing water demand in the sector. Crop pattern optimization has emerged as a key strategy for achieving significant water savings. However, most existing studies prioritize yield maximization over minimizing water consumption. Additionally, water-based optimization efforts often rely on low temporal resolution data and rarely offer practical recommendations for crop pattern design. This study aims to evaluate water-saving potential in agriculture through crop pattern optimization based on water footprint (WF) assessments, focusing on the Ceyhan River Basin-an important hotspot for diverse crop production in Türkiye. The method effectively balances blue, green, and grey water components by integrating high-resolution spatial WF data from the SWAT hydrological model into a multi-objective optimization framework. We developed six scenarios: Scenario S1 prioritizes total WF reduction, while Scenario S6 focuses solely on blue WF, with intermediate scenarios representing linear blends of these priorities. The results show that scenario S1 achieves a 23.4% reduction in total WF (614 million m³)-comparable to the annual wheat consumption of 1.8 million people-whereas scenario S6 attains a 47.9% decrease in blue WF (464 million m³), potentially meeting the daily water needs of 5.6 million individuals. Notably, an intermediate scenario (S5) provides a balanced reduction across WF components with a more uniform crop distribution, enhancing its practical appeal. Recognizing that farmer practices and economic concerns may hinder implementation, we recommend establishing targeted incentive mechanisms-such as financial support for farmers who adopt optimized cropping patterns-to facilitate the transition toward water-efficient practices. Overall, this research offers a robust decision-support tool for policymakers and water resource managers, providing clear guidance for aligning agricultural practices with sustainable water management and enhancing food and water security in water-scarce regions.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas:
Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making
Health and ecological risk and impact assessment
Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems
Sustaining ecosystems
Managing large-scale environmental change
Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society:
Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation
Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability
Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability
Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.