Motivational Interviewing in Addiction Services: An Exploratory Study of Training Needs.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Nuri Wieland, Helle Larsen, Reinout W Wiers, Julia Kühling, Wiebke Brunner, Ulrich Frischknecht
{"title":"Motivational Interviewing in Addiction Services: An Exploratory Study of Training Needs.","authors":"Nuri Wieland, Helle Larsen, Reinout W Wiers, Julia Kühling, Wiebke Brunner, Ulrich Frischknecht","doi":"10.1159/000546243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing (MI) in addiction treatment has been proven many times. Many national treatment guidelines throughout the EU recommend MI as a method in the treatment of addiction-related and comorbid disorders. However, little is known on the availability of workforce that is able to provide sufficiently quality-secured MI. The aim of this study was to investigate the level of training and the use of MI among addiction care professionals in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a quantitative, anonymous cross-sectional survey, 262 professionals from the addiction care system were asked about their training in MI, their level of knowledge, the motivation of their clients, and the use of MI in practice. All data analyses were carried out using SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the professionals, 54.8% (n = 143) reported having had at least 1 day of training in MI. 64.3% (n = 90) of the trained professionals felt sufficiently trained for their area of responsibility. 31.0% (n = 83) of the total sample stated that further training, quality circles, training courses, or similar had been set up at their facility. Results of an ordinal logistic regression indicated that the use of MI in practice could be predicted by MI-specific training (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.13-0.38, p < 0.01) and the availability of MI support structures in the institution (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.28-0.81, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest a divergence between medical treatment recommendations for the use of MI and the level of training required for this in the German addiction treatment landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":11902,"journal":{"name":"European Addiction Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Addiction Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing (MI) in addiction treatment has been proven many times. Many national treatment guidelines throughout the EU recommend MI as a method in the treatment of addiction-related and comorbid disorders. However, little is known on the availability of workforce that is able to provide sufficiently quality-secured MI. The aim of this study was to investigate the level of training and the use of MI among addiction care professionals in Germany.

Methods: In a quantitative, anonymous cross-sectional survey, 262 professionals from the addiction care system were asked about their training in MI, their level of knowledge, the motivation of their clients, and the use of MI in practice. All data analyses were carried out using SPSS.

Results: Among the professionals, 54.8% (n = 143) reported having had at least 1 day of training in MI. 64.3% (n = 90) of the trained professionals felt sufficiently trained for their area of responsibility. 31.0% (n = 83) of the total sample stated that further training, quality circles, training courses, or similar had been set up at their facility. Results of an ordinal logistic regression indicated that the use of MI in practice could be predicted by MI-specific training (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.13-0.38, p < 0.01) and the availability of MI support structures in the institution (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.28-0.81, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The results suggest a divergence between medical treatment recommendations for the use of MI and the level of training required for this in the German addiction treatment landscape.

成瘾服务中的动机性访谈:训练需求的探索性研究。
引言:动机性访谈(MI)在成瘾治疗中的有效性已被多次证实。整个欧盟的许多国家治疗指南建议将心肌梗死作为治疗成瘾相关疾病和合并症的一种方法。然而,对于能够提供足够质量保证的心肌梗死的劳动力的可用性知之甚少。本研究的目的是调查德国成瘾护理专业人员的培训水平和心肌梗死的使用情况。方法:在一项定量的匿名横断面调查中,262名来自成瘾护理系统的专业人员被问及他们在MI方面的培训,他们的知识水平,他们的客户的动机以及在实践中使用MI。所有数据分析均采用SPSS软件进行。结果:在专业人员中,55.0% (n=143)报告至少接受过一天的MI培训。64.3% (n=90)的培训专业人员认为他们的责任领域得到了充分的培训。31.0% (n=83)的总样本表示,他们的工厂已经设立了进一步的培训、质量圈、培训课程或类似的课程。有序逻辑回归的结果表明,在实践中,心肌梗死的使用可以通过心肌梗死特异性训练来预测(OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.13-0.38)。结论:结果表明,在德国成瘾治疗领域,使用心肌梗死的医疗建议与所需的训练水平之间存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Addiction Research
European Addiction Research SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Addiction Research'' is a unique international scientific journal for the rapid publication of innovative research covering all aspects of addiction and related disorders. Representing an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of recent data and expert opinion, it reflects the importance of a comprehensive approach to resolve the problems of substance abuse and addiction in Europe. Coverage ranges from clinical and research advances in the fields of psychiatry, biology, pharmacology and epidemiology to social, and legal implications of policy decisions. The goal is to facilitate open discussion among those interested in the scientific and clinical aspects of prevention, diagnosis and therapy as well as dealing with legal issues. An excellent range of original papers makes ‘European Addiction Research’ the forum of choice for all.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信