Moawia Gameraddin, Awadia Gareeballah, Abdulaziz A Qurashi, Abdullah Fahad Alshamrani, Osama Ahmed Alasiri, Maher Mosfer Aljohani, Amel F Alzain, Omar Adel Almutairi, Abdulmalik Basheer Alenezi, Renad Albadrani, Awatif Omer, Maisa Elzaki, Abdalrahim Tagelsir Elsayed, Emadeldin Mohamed Mukhtar
{"title":"Investigation of radiology professionals' awareness of CT head artifacts.","authors":"Moawia Gameraddin, Awadia Gareeballah, Abdulaziz A Qurashi, Abdullah Fahad Alshamrani, Osama Ahmed Alasiri, Maher Mosfer Aljohani, Amel F Alzain, Omar Adel Almutairi, Abdulmalik Basheer Alenezi, Renad Albadrani, Awatif Omer, Maisa Elzaki, Abdalrahim Tagelsir Elsayed, Emadeldin Mohamed Mukhtar","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07300-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Computerized tomography (CT) artifacts can happen for various causes. It is critical to understand these artifacts because they can mimic disease or reduce image quality to non-diagnostic levels. CT artifacts can be characterized according to their underlying cause. This study aims to evaluate and compare the understanding of CT head artifacts between radiographers and radiography interns, supplemented by insights from a select group of participating radiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study included 150 participants. All participants' average knowledge score of CT head artifact was good (77.81%). The most correctly identified CT head artifacts were the metal artifact (86%), ring artifact (84.7%), and motion artifact (81.3%). The beam hardening artifact was correctly identified less frequently (62%). There is significant difference in the recognition of motion artifacts among the participants (P = 0.001) knowledge of CT head image artifacts improved significantly with more experienced participants (P = 0.001), where participants with less than 10 months of experience had a higher rate of incorrect responses (85 incorrect vs. 31 correct). The recognition of these artifacts improves with experience and advanced age. Understanding these artifacts is essential to avoid misdiagnosis of various diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07300-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Computerized tomography (CT) artifacts can happen for various causes. It is critical to understand these artifacts because they can mimic disease or reduce image quality to non-diagnostic levels. CT artifacts can be characterized according to their underlying cause. This study aims to evaluate and compare the understanding of CT head artifacts between radiographers and radiography interns, supplemented by insights from a select group of participating radiologists.
Results: A cross-sectional survey study included 150 participants. All participants' average knowledge score of CT head artifact was good (77.81%). The most correctly identified CT head artifacts were the metal artifact (86%), ring artifact (84.7%), and motion artifact (81.3%). The beam hardening artifact was correctly identified less frequently (62%). There is significant difference in the recognition of motion artifacts among the participants (P = 0.001) knowledge of CT head image artifacts improved significantly with more experienced participants (P = 0.001), where participants with less than 10 months of experience had a higher rate of incorrect responses (85 incorrect vs. 31 correct). The recognition of these artifacts improves with experience and advanced age. Understanding these artifacts is essential to avoid misdiagnosis of various diseases.
BMC Research NotesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍:
BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.