Investigation of radiology professionals' awareness of CT head artifacts.

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Moawia Gameraddin, Awadia Gareeballah, Abdulaziz A Qurashi, Abdullah Fahad Alshamrani, Osama Ahmed Alasiri, Maher Mosfer Aljohani, Amel F Alzain, Omar Adel Almutairi, Abdulmalik Basheer Alenezi, Renad Albadrani, Awatif Omer, Maisa Elzaki, Abdalrahim Tagelsir Elsayed, Emadeldin Mohamed Mukhtar
{"title":"Investigation of radiology professionals' awareness of CT head artifacts.","authors":"Moawia Gameraddin, Awadia Gareeballah, Abdulaziz A Qurashi, Abdullah Fahad Alshamrani, Osama Ahmed Alasiri, Maher Mosfer Aljohani, Amel F Alzain, Omar Adel Almutairi, Abdulmalik Basheer Alenezi, Renad Albadrani, Awatif Omer, Maisa Elzaki, Abdalrahim Tagelsir Elsayed, Emadeldin Mohamed Mukhtar","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07300-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Computerized tomography (CT) artifacts can happen for various causes. It is critical to understand these artifacts because they can mimic disease or reduce image quality to non-diagnostic levels. CT artifacts can be characterized according to their underlying cause. This study aims to evaluate and compare the understanding of CT head artifacts between radiographers and radiography interns, supplemented by insights from a select group of participating radiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study included 150 participants. All participants' average knowledge score of CT head artifact was good (77.81%). The most correctly identified CT head artifacts were the metal artifact (86%), ring artifact (84.7%), and motion artifact (81.3%). The beam hardening artifact was correctly identified less frequently (62%). There is significant difference in the recognition of motion artifacts among the participants (P = 0.001) knowledge of CT head image artifacts improved significantly with more experienced participants (P = 0.001), where participants with less than 10 months of experience had a higher rate of incorrect responses (85 incorrect vs. 31 correct). The recognition of these artifacts improves with experience and advanced age. Understanding these artifacts is essential to avoid misdiagnosis of various diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07300-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Computerized tomography (CT) artifacts can happen for various causes. It is critical to understand these artifacts because they can mimic disease or reduce image quality to non-diagnostic levels. CT artifacts can be characterized according to their underlying cause. This study aims to evaluate and compare the understanding of CT head artifacts between radiographers and radiography interns, supplemented by insights from a select group of participating radiologists.

Results: A cross-sectional survey study included 150 participants. All participants' average knowledge score of CT head artifact was good (77.81%). The most correctly identified CT head artifacts were the metal artifact (86%), ring artifact (84.7%), and motion artifact (81.3%). The beam hardening artifact was correctly identified less frequently (62%). There is significant difference in the recognition of motion artifacts among the participants (P = 0.001) knowledge of CT head image artifacts improved significantly with more experienced participants (P = 0.001), where participants with less than 10 months of experience had a higher rate of incorrect responses (85 incorrect vs. 31 correct). The recognition of these artifacts improves with experience and advanced age. Understanding these artifacts is essential to avoid misdiagnosis of various diseases.

放射科专业人员对CT头部伪影认知的调查。
目的:计算机断层扫描(CT)伪影的产生有多种原因。了解这些伪影是至关重要的,因为它们可以模拟疾病或将图像质量降低到非诊断水平。CT伪影可以根据其潜在原因进行表征。本研究旨在评估和比较放射科医师和实习放射科医师对CT头部伪影的理解,并辅以一组参与研究的放射科医师的见解。结果:横断面调查研究包括150名参与者。所有参与者对CT头部伪影的平均知识得分均较好(77.81%)。正确识别的CT头部伪影是金属伪影(86%)、环形伪影(84.7%)和运动伪影(81.3%)。正确识别光束硬化伪影的频率较低(62%)。参与者对运动伪影的识别有显著差异(P = 0.001),经验丰富的参与者对CT头部图像伪影的知识显著提高(P = 0.001),经验不足10个月的参与者有更高的错误反应率(85个错误对31个正确)。随着经验和年龄的增长,对这些人工制品的识别能力也会提高。了解这些伪影对于避免各种疾病的误诊至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信