Systematic review on the management of diuretic resistance in acute heart failure across the spectrum of kidney disease.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pedro Marques, Mackenzie Blydt-Hansen, Tomoko Takano, João Pedro Ferreira, Michael A Tsoukas, Abhinav Sharma, Thomas A Mavrakanas
{"title":"Systematic review on the management of diuretic resistance in acute heart failure across the spectrum of kidney disease.","authors":"Pedro Marques, Mackenzie Blydt-Hansen, Tomoko Takano, João Pedro Ferreira, Michael A Tsoukas, Abhinav Sharma, Thomas A Mavrakanas","doi":"10.1159/000546520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Diuretic resistance is commonly reported in acute heart failure (AHF), especially in patients presenting with impaired kidney function. Effective treatment strategies for promoting decongestion in this population remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review using Medline/Cochrane databases was performed from inception to January 2024 identifying randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including patients with diuretic resistance or at risk of diuretic resistance based on the presence of kidney dysfunction at study enrollment. Trials testing different pharmacological or invasive modalities compared to standard of care, placebo or an active comparator were considered. Data on decongestion related outcomes, safety outcomes and clinical outcomes up to 90 days were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 22 RCTs included, 6 trials involved 529 patients with established diuretic resistance, while 16 trials enrolled 1913 patients at risk of diuretic resistance. Diuretic resistance was differently defined across studies and most trials focused on interventions targeting different sites of action along the renal tubules. The different treatment strategies demonstrated efficacy in promoting decongestion while being associated with mild increase in creatinine and cystatin C. The use of appropriately high doses of intravenous loop diuretics was able to promote decongestion across the spectrum of kidney dysfunction. The presence of baseline kidney dysfunction did not identify a population resistant to standard decongestive strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diuretic resistance is not accurately defined in AHF but is uncommon in patients treated with appropriately high doses of intravenous loop diuretics. The main therapeutic goal during the acute setting should focus on promoting decongestion instead of overemphasizing on mild changes in kidney related biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9584,"journal":{"name":"Cardiorenal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiorenal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546520","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Diuretic resistance is commonly reported in acute heart failure (AHF), especially in patients presenting with impaired kidney function. Effective treatment strategies for promoting decongestion in this population remain unclear.

Methods: A systematic review using Medline/Cochrane databases was performed from inception to January 2024 identifying randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including patients with diuretic resistance or at risk of diuretic resistance based on the presence of kidney dysfunction at study enrollment. Trials testing different pharmacological or invasive modalities compared to standard of care, placebo or an active comparator were considered. Data on decongestion related outcomes, safety outcomes and clinical outcomes up to 90 days were collected.

Results: Among the 22 RCTs included, 6 trials involved 529 patients with established diuretic resistance, while 16 trials enrolled 1913 patients at risk of diuretic resistance. Diuretic resistance was differently defined across studies and most trials focused on interventions targeting different sites of action along the renal tubules. The different treatment strategies demonstrated efficacy in promoting decongestion while being associated with mild increase in creatinine and cystatin C. The use of appropriately high doses of intravenous loop diuretics was able to promote decongestion across the spectrum of kidney dysfunction. The presence of baseline kidney dysfunction did not identify a population resistant to standard decongestive strategies.

Conclusions: Diuretic resistance is not accurately defined in AHF but is uncommon in patients treated with appropriately high doses of intravenous loop diuretics. The main therapeutic goal during the acute setting should focus on promoting decongestion instead of overemphasizing on mild changes in kidney related biomarkers.

肾脏疾病急性心力衰竭患者利尿剂抵抗治疗的系统综述
背景/目的:利尿剂耐药在急性心力衰竭(AHF)中经常被报道,特别是在肾功能受损的患者中。促进这一人群疏解拥堵的有效治疗策略尚不清楚。方法:从研究开始到2024年1月,使用Medline/Cochrane数据库进行系统评价,确定随机临床试验(rct),包括在研究入组时存在肾功能障碍的利尿剂抵抗或利尿剂抵抗风险的患者。与标准护理、安慰剂或活性比较物相比,试验测试了不同的药理学或侵入性模式。收集了缓解拥堵相关结局、安全性结局和90天临床结局的数据。结果:在纳入的22项随机对照试验中,6项试验纳入了529例已确定利尿剂耐药的患者,16项试验纳入了1913例存在利尿剂耐药风险的患者。在不同的研究中,利尿剂耐药性的定义不同,大多数试验集中在针对肾小管不同作用部位的干预措施上。不同的治疗策略显示出促进去充血的有效性,同时与肌酐和胱抑素c的轻度升高有关。使用适当高剂量的静脉利尿剂能够促进整个肾功能障碍范围内的去充血。基线肾功能不全的存在并不能确定对标准降血策略有抵抗的人群。结论:利尿剂耐药在AHF中没有准确定义,但在接受适当高剂量静脉循环利尿剂治疗的患者中并不常见。急性期的主要治疗目标应侧重于促进去充血,而不是过分强调肾脏相关生物标志物的轻微变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiorenal Medicine
Cardiorenal Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal ''Cardiorenal Medicine'' explores the mechanisms by which obesity and other metabolic abnormalities promote the pathogenesis and progression of heart and kidney disease (cardiorenal metabolic syndrome). It provides an interdisciplinary platform for the advancement of research and clinical practice, focussing on translational issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信