Machine-learning modeL based on computed tomography body composition analysis for the estimation of resting energy expenditure: A pilot study.

IF 2.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Fiorella Palmas, Andreea Ciudin, Jose Melian, Raul Guerra, Alba Zabalegui, Guillermo Cárdenas, Fernanda Mucarzel, Aitor Rodriguez, Nuria Roson, Rosa Burgos, Cristina Hernández, Rafael Simó
{"title":"Machine-learning modeL based on computed tomography body composition analysis for the estimation of resting energy expenditure: A pilot study.","authors":"Fiorella Palmas, Andreea Ciudin, Jose Melian, Raul Guerra, Alba Zabalegui, Guillermo Cárdenas, Fernanda Mucarzel, Aitor Rodriguez, Nuria Roson, Rosa Burgos, Cristina Hernández, Rafael Simó","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.05.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>The assessment of resting energy expenditure (REE) is a challenging task with the current existing methods. The reference method, indirect calorimetry (IC), is not widely available, and other surrogates, such as equations and bioimpedance (BIA) show poor agreement with IC. Body composition (BC), in particular muscle mass, plays an important role in REE. In recent years, computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a reliable tool for BC assessment, but its usefulness for the REE evaluation has not been examined. In the present study we have explored the usefulness of CT-scan imaging to assess the REE using AI machine-learning models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-centre observational cross-sectional pilot study from January to June 2022, including 90 fasting, clinically stable adults (≥18 years) with no contraindications for indirect calorimetry (IC), bioimpedance (BIA), or abdominal CT-scan. REE was measured using classical predictive equations, IC, BIA and skeletal CT-scan. The proposed model was based on a second-order linear regression with different input parameters, and the output corresponds to the estimated REE. The model was trained and tested using a cross-validation one-vs-all strategy including subjects with different characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 90 subjects were included in the final analysis. Bland-Altman plots showed that the CT-based estimation model had a mean bias of 0 kcal/day (LoA: -508.4 to 508.4) compared with IC, indicating better agreement than most predictive equations and similar agreement to BIA (bias 53.4 kcal/day, LoA: -475.7 to 582.4). Surprisingly, gender and BMI, ones of the mains variables included in all the BIA algorithms and mathematical equations were not relevant variables for REE calculated by means of AI coupled to skeletal CT scan. These findings were consistent with the results of other performance metrics, including mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), which also favored the CT-based method over conventional equations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that the analysis of a CT-scan image by means of machine learning model is a reliable tool for the REE estimation. These findings have the potential to significantly change the paradigm and guidelines for nutritional assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.05.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: The assessment of resting energy expenditure (REE) is a challenging task with the current existing methods. The reference method, indirect calorimetry (IC), is not widely available, and other surrogates, such as equations and bioimpedance (BIA) show poor agreement with IC. Body composition (BC), in particular muscle mass, plays an important role in REE. In recent years, computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a reliable tool for BC assessment, but its usefulness for the REE evaluation has not been examined. In the present study we have explored the usefulness of CT-scan imaging to assess the REE using AI machine-learning models.

Methods: Single-centre observational cross-sectional pilot study from January to June 2022, including 90 fasting, clinically stable adults (≥18 years) with no contraindications for indirect calorimetry (IC), bioimpedance (BIA), or abdominal CT-scan. REE was measured using classical predictive equations, IC, BIA and skeletal CT-scan. The proposed model was based on a second-order linear regression with different input parameters, and the output corresponds to the estimated REE. The model was trained and tested using a cross-validation one-vs-all strategy including subjects with different characteristics.

Results: Data from 90 subjects were included in the final analysis. Bland-Altman plots showed that the CT-based estimation model had a mean bias of 0 kcal/day (LoA: -508.4 to 508.4) compared with IC, indicating better agreement than most predictive equations and similar agreement to BIA (bias 53.4 kcal/day, LoA: -475.7 to 582.4). Surprisingly, gender and BMI, ones of the mains variables included in all the BIA algorithms and mathematical equations were not relevant variables for REE calculated by means of AI coupled to skeletal CT scan. These findings were consistent with the results of other performance metrics, including mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), which also favored the CT-based method over conventional equations.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the analysis of a CT-scan image by means of machine learning model is a reliable tool for the REE estimation. These findings have the potential to significantly change the paradigm and guidelines for nutritional assessment.

基于计算机断层扫描身体成分分析的机器学习模型用于估计静息能量消耗:一项试点研究。
背景与目的:静息能量消耗(REE)的评估是一项具有挑战性的任务。参考方法间接量热法(IC)尚未广泛使用,其他替代方法,如方程和生物阻抗(BIA)与IC的一致性较差。体成分(BC),特别是肌肉质量,在REE中起着重要作用。近年来,计算机断层扫描(CT)已成为一种可靠的BC评估工具,但其对REE评估的有效性尚未得到检验。在本研究中,我们探索了使用人工智能机器学习模型评估ct扫描成像的有用性。方法:2022年1月至6月的单中心观察性横断面试点研究,包括90名禁食,临床稳定的成年人(≥18岁),无间接量热法(IC),生物阻抗(BIA)或腹部ct扫描禁忌症。REE采用经典预测方程、IC、BIA和骨骼ct扫描进行测量。该模型基于不同输入参数的二阶线性回归,其输出与估算的REE相对应。采用交叉验证的一对一策略对模型进行训练和测试,包括具有不同特征的受试者。结果:90名受试者的数据被纳入最终分析。Bland-Altman图显示,与IC相比,基于ct的估计模型的平均偏差为0 kcal/day (LoA: -508.4至508.4),表明与大多数预测方程的一致性更好,与BIA的一致性相似(偏差53.4 kcal/day, LoA: -475.7至582.4)。令人惊讶的是,性别和BMI(所有BIA算法和数学方程中包含的主要变量之一)并不是人工智能结合骨骼CT扫描计算REE的相关变量。这些发现与其他性能指标的结果一致,包括平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和Lin’s一致性相关系数(CCC),后者也比传统方程更倾向于基于ct的方法。结论:我们的研究结果表明,利用机器学习模型对ct扫描图像进行分析是估算稀土元素的可靠工具。这些发现有可能显著改变营养评估的范式和指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
Clinical nutrition ESPEN NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
512
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信