The effect of the administration form of antibiotic therapy on the gut microbiome in patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers - DFIATIM trial.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Chahrazed Mekadim, Jakub Mrazek, Kateřina Olša Fliegerová, Hana Sechovcová, Tiziana Maria Mahayri, Radka Jarošíková, Jitka Husáková, Veronika Wosková, Petr Tůma, Jan Polák, Dominika Sojáková, Andrea Němcová, Michal Dubský, Vladimíra Fejfarová
{"title":"The effect of the administration form of antibiotic therapy on the gut microbiome in patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers - DFIATIM trial.","authors":"Chahrazed Mekadim, Jakub Mrazek, Kateřina Olša Fliegerová, Hana Sechovcová, Tiziana Maria Mahayri, Radka Jarošíková, Jitka Husáková, Veronika Wosková, Petr Tůma, Jan Polák, Dominika Sojáková, Andrea Němcová, Michal Dubský, Vladimíra Fejfarová","doi":"10.1186/s12866-025-04041-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) contribute to the global disability burden. Beta-lactams are the most commonly used antibiotics for treating DFIs. However, the use of antibiotics may lead to disruption of the healthy balance of the gut microbiota, causing dysbiosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers (iDFUs) were treated with two kinds of beta-lactams (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or ceftazidime) according to microbial sensitivity of causative agents via bolus or continuous administration modes. Changes in the gut microbiome of patients were analyzed. Diabetic patients without iDFUs were used as a control group. 16 S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing was performed on stool samples collected from participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Alpha diversity and beta diversity of gut microbiota of treated patients did not show significant differences between bolus and continuous modes. However, significant differences were observed between gut microbiota diversity of treated patients and control group. PCoA plots showed individualized responses of the patient's gut microbiota to antibiotics at different times using both administration forms associated with the pre-treatment state of microbiota composition. Enterococcus, Sellimonas, and Lachnoclostridium were the common bacterial markers differentially abundant in the gut microbiota of antibiotic-treated patients with iDFUs while Roseburia, Dorea, and Monoglobus were mainly abundant in the gut microbiota of patients without iDFUs. Predicted pathways like \"Transporters\", \"ABC transporters\" and \"Phosphotranspherase system (PTS)\" were upregulated in the gut microbiome of patients treated with bolus regime which may lead to increased intestinal barrier permeability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study reported alterations in gut microbiota composition and functionality and provided the bacterial markers as well as potential metabolic signatures associated with each administration mode in patients with iDFUs, which may be used as a reference set for future studies of the effect of antibiotics administration on the gut microbiome of patients with iDFUs. This study shed light on the importance of understanding the effect of antibiotic administration form on gut microbiome in patients with iDFUs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The DFIATIM Clinical Trial (Full title: \"Rationalisation of ATB therapy in diabetic foot infection and its impact on the intestinal microbiota\") is submitted to the European Union Clinical Trials Database under the EudraCT Number: 2019-001997-27. The date of registration is July 17th, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":9233,"journal":{"name":"BMC Microbiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"339"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-04041-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) contribute to the global disability burden. Beta-lactams are the most commonly used antibiotics for treating DFIs. However, the use of antibiotics may lead to disruption of the healthy balance of the gut microbiota, causing dysbiosis.

Methods: Patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers (iDFUs) were treated with two kinds of beta-lactams (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or ceftazidime) according to microbial sensitivity of causative agents via bolus or continuous administration modes. Changes in the gut microbiome of patients were analyzed. Diabetic patients without iDFUs were used as a control group. 16 S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing was performed on stool samples collected from participants.

Results: Alpha diversity and beta diversity of gut microbiota of treated patients did not show significant differences between bolus and continuous modes. However, significant differences were observed between gut microbiota diversity of treated patients and control group. PCoA plots showed individualized responses of the patient's gut microbiota to antibiotics at different times using both administration forms associated with the pre-treatment state of microbiota composition. Enterococcus, Sellimonas, and Lachnoclostridium were the common bacterial markers differentially abundant in the gut microbiota of antibiotic-treated patients with iDFUs while Roseburia, Dorea, and Monoglobus were mainly abundant in the gut microbiota of patients without iDFUs. Predicted pathways like "Transporters", "ABC transporters" and "Phosphotranspherase system (PTS)" were upregulated in the gut microbiome of patients treated with bolus regime which may lead to increased intestinal barrier permeability.

Conclusion: The present study reported alterations in gut microbiota composition and functionality and provided the bacterial markers as well as potential metabolic signatures associated with each administration mode in patients with iDFUs, which may be used as a reference set for future studies of the effect of antibiotics administration on the gut microbiome of patients with iDFUs. This study shed light on the importance of understanding the effect of antibiotic administration form on gut microbiome in patients with iDFUs.

Trial registration: The DFIATIM Clinical Trial (Full title: "Rationalisation of ATB therapy in diabetic foot infection and its impact on the intestinal microbiota") is submitted to the European Union Clinical Trials Database under the EudraCT Number: 2019-001997-27. The date of registration is July 17th, 2020.

抗生素治疗给药形式对感染糖尿病足溃疡患者肠道微生物组的影响- DFIATIM试验
背景:糖尿病足感染(dfi)是全球残疾负担之一。β -内酰胺类抗生素是治疗dfi最常用的抗生素。然而,抗生素的使用可能导致肠道菌群健康平衡的破坏,引起生态失调。方法:根据病原菌对阿莫西林/克拉维酸或头孢他啶的微生物敏感性,采用大剂量或连续给药两种内酰胺类药物治疗糖尿病足溃疡(iDFUs)患者。分析患者肠道微生物组的变化。无idfu的糖尿病患者作为对照组。对参与者粪便样本进行16s核糖体RNA基因扩增子测序。结果:治疗组患者肠道菌群α多样性和β多样性在给药模式和连续模式之间无显著差异。然而,治疗组和对照组的肠道菌群多样性存在显著差异。PCoA图显示了患者肠道微生物群在不同时间对抗生素的个体化反应,使用两种给药形式与微生物群组成的预处理状态相关。肠球菌、Sellimonas和Lachnoclostridium是抗生素治疗的iDFUs患者肠道菌群中差异丰富的常见细菌标记,而Roseburia、Dorea和Monoglobus主要在未治疗的iDFUs患者肠道菌群中丰富。在接受大剂量治疗的患者肠道微生物组中,“转运体”、“ABC转运体”和“磷酸转氨酶系统(PTS)”等可预测的通路上调,这可能导致肠道屏障通透性增加。结论:本研究报告了iDFUs患者肠道微生物群组成和功能的改变,并提供了与每种给药方式相关的细菌标记物和潜在代谢特征,可作为未来研究抗生素给药对iDFUs患者肠道微生物群影响的参考集。这项研究阐明了了解抗生素给药形式对idfu患者肠道微生物组的影响的重要性。试验注册:DFIATIM临床试验(全文:“ATB治疗糖尿病足感染的合理化及其对肠道微生物群的影响”)提交给欧盟临床试验数据库,EudraCT号:2019-001997-27。注册日期为2020年7月17日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Microbiology
BMC Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Microbiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on analytical and functional studies of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and small parasites, as well as host and therapeutic responses to them and their interaction with the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信