International survey of cardiac device clinic staff determining patient-perceived challenges with remote monitoring.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Bert Vandenberk, Neal Ferrick, Elaine Y Wan, Sanjiv M Narayan, Aileen M Ferrick, Satish R Raj
{"title":"International survey of cardiac device clinic staff determining patient-perceived challenges with remote monitoring.","authors":"Bert Vandenberk, Neal Ferrick, Elaine Y Wan, Sanjiv M Narayan, Aileen M Ferrick, Satish R Raj","doi":"10.1080/00015385.2025.2510704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regular interaction with patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) provides CIED clinic personnel with unique insights into patient-related barriers and challenges to remote monitoring (RM) implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a global network, an international survey was administered to CIED clinic personnel. Qualitative questions gathered information on perceived challenges with patient connectivity and patient-level barriers associated with RM implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 339 responses from 302 unique centres were included in the analysis. Respondents most often were cardiac electrophysiologists (57.8%), followed by nurses (17.1%) and nurse practitioners (7.7%). Most respondents (84.7%) reported at least one challenge in daily RM management. The biggest challenge was the increasing data volume and data variability (38.3%), followed by staff shortage (33.8%), difficulties with billing for technical activities (20.2%), and insufficient RM reimbursement (16.0%). Patient connectivity was identified as a major barrier by 72.7% of respondents. The main concerns were patient literacy (80.8%), followed by a lack of patient understanding of RM importance (65.8%), the lack of required bandwidth or technology to support RM (49.6%), and the cost to the patient (47.9%). Subgroup analyses showed that patient connectivity was often identified as a major barrier by non-MD CIED clinic staff, respondents working in office-based CIED clinics, and respondents from clinics with a per-patient payment reimbursement model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are many patient-related barriers identified by non-MD CIED clinic staff. Dedicated strategies to optimise the utilisation and adherence of RM of patients with CIEDs are urgently needed to improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":6979,"journal":{"name":"Acta cardiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cardiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2025.2510704","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Regular interaction with patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) provides CIED clinic personnel with unique insights into patient-related barriers and challenges to remote monitoring (RM) implementation.

Methods: Using a global network, an international survey was administered to CIED clinic personnel. Qualitative questions gathered information on perceived challenges with patient connectivity and patient-level barriers associated with RM implementation.

Results: A total of 339 responses from 302 unique centres were included in the analysis. Respondents most often were cardiac electrophysiologists (57.8%), followed by nurses (17.1%) and nurse practitioners (7.7%). Most respondents (84.7%) reported at least one challenge in daily RM management. The biggest challenge was the increasing data volume and data variability (38.3%), followed by staff shortage (33.8%), difficulties with billing for technical activities (20.2%), and insufficient RM reimbursement (16.0%). Patient connectivity was identified as a major barrier by 72.7% of respondents. The main concerns were patient literacy (80.8%), followed by a lack of patient understanding of RM importance (65.8%), the lack of required bandwidth or technology to support RM (49.6%), and the cost to the patient (47.9%). Subgroup analyses showed that patient connectivity was often identified as a major barrier by non-MD CIED clinic staff, respondents working in office-based CIED clinics, and respondents from clinics with a per-patient payment reimbursement model.

Conclusions: There are many patient-related barriers identified by non-MD CIED clinic staff. Dedicated strategies to optimise the utilisation and adherence of RM of patients with CIEDs are urgently needed to improve clinical outcomes.

心脏装置临床工作人员确定患者感知挑战的远程监测的国际调查。
背景:与心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)患者的定期互动为CIED临床人员提供了独特的见解,了解与患者相关的障碍和远程监测(RM)实施的挑战。方法:利用全球网络,对CIED诊所人员进行国际调查。定性问题收集了与患者连接的感知挑战和与RM实施相关的患者层面障碍的信息。结果:来自302个独特中心的339个回复被纳入分析。受访者中以心脏电生理学家(57.8%)最多,其次是护士(17.1%)和执业护士(7.7%)。大多数受访者(84.7%)表示在日常RM管理中至少有一个挑战。最大的挑战是不断增加的数据量和数据可变性(38.3%),其次是人员短缺(33.8%),技术活动计费困难(20.2%),以及RM报销不足(16.0%)。72.7%的受访者认为患者连接是一个主要障碍。主要的担忧是患者素养(80.8%),其次是患者缺乏对RM重要性的理解(65.8%),缺乏所需的带宽或技术来支持RM(49.6%),以及患者的成本(47.9%)。亚组分析显示,非md CIED诊所工作人员、在办公室CIED诊所工作的受访者以及来自按患者付费报销模式诊所的受访者通常认为,患者连接是主要障碍。结论:非md CIED临床工作人员发现了许多与患者相关的障碍。迫切需要专门的策略来优化cied患者RM的利用和依从性,以改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta cardiologica
Acta cardiologica 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
115
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Cardiologica is an international journal. It publishes bi-monthly original, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease including observational studies, clinical trials, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance and tutorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信