Struggling or Thriving With Technology at Work: A Mixed-Method Analysis of Personal and Organizational ICT Resources

IF 4.3 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rita Jakstiene, Ieva Urbanaviciute, Arunas Ziedelis, Jurgita Lazauskaite-Zabielske
{"title":"Struggling or Thriving With Technology at Work: A Mixed-Method Analysis of Personal and Organizational ICT Resources","authors":"Rita Jakstiene,&nbsp;Ieva Urbanaviciute,&nbsp;Arunas Ziedelis,&nbsp;Jurgita Lazauskaite-Zabielske","doi":"10.1155/hbe2/5422987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the modern work landscape, technology and digitalisation are ubiquitous. The rise of hybrid work alone has dramatically increased workers’ exposure to and dependence on information and communication technology (ICT) tools. While technology enables people to work faster and smarter, it can also restrict and induce technostress. Therefore, it is necessary to identify ICT-related resources that may help prevent these harmful effects. To this end, we adopted a mixed-method approach. In Study 1, using the critical incident technique, we collected accounts of positive and negative situations of ICT usage in the workplace from 95 individuals. Content analyses were performed on these data to define resource categories that were relevant for dealing with the technological side of work. The results revealed that, depending on the valence of the critical incident, workers tended to rely on somewhat different personal resources. These findings highlight the importance of various sources of personal efficacy, including technical literacy and nontechnical knowledge and skills. On the organizational-level, several categories emerged, encompassing aspects of IT infrastructure and technical literacy facilitation. Furthermore, in Study 2, a two-wave panel survey (<i>N</i> = 335) was conducted to investigate longitudinal relationships between selected personal and organizational resources (respectively, ICT self-efficacy and technical literacy facilitation) and burnout via the satisfaction of basic psychological needs. The results suggested an indirect effect, as both types of ICT resources positively predicted autonomy need satisfaction, and the latter was associated with a lower risk of burnout over time. However, this effect seems to be mostly applicable to hybrid but not office-based workers. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed based on these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/5422987","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/5422987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the modern work landscape, technology and digitalisation are ubiquitous. The rise of hybrid work alone has dramatically increased workers’ exposure to and dependence on information and communication technology (ICT) tools. While technology enables people to work faster and smarter, it can also restrict and induce technostress. Therefore, it is necessary to identify ICT-related resources that may help prevent these harmful effects. To this end, we adopted a mixed-method approach. In Study 1, using the critical incident technique, we collected accounts of positive and negative situations of ICT usage in the workplace from 95 individuals. Content analyses were performed on these data to define resource categories that were relevant for dealing with the technological side of work. The results revealed that, depending on the valence of the critical incident, workers tended to rely on somewhat different personal resources. These findings highlight the importance of various sources of personal efficacy, including technical literacy and nontechnical knowledge and skills. On the organizational-level, several categories emerged, encompassing aspects of IT infrastructure and technical literacy facilitation. Furthermore, in Study 2, a two-wave panel survey (N = 335) was conducted to investigate longitudinal relationships between selected personal and organizational resources (respectively, ICT self-efficacy and technical literacy facilitation) and burnout via the satisfaction of basic psychological needs. The results suggested an indirect effect, as both types of ICT resources positively predicted autonomy need satisfaction, and the latter was associated with a lower risk of burnout over time. However, this effect seems to be mostly applicable to hybrid but not office-based workers. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed based on these findings.

在工作中与技术斗争或繁荣:个人和组织信息通信技术资源的混合方法分析
在现代工作环境中,技术和数字化无处不在。仅混合工作的兴起就极大地增加了工人对信息和通信技术(ICT)工具的接触和依赖。虽然技术使人们工作得更快、更聪明,但它也会限制和诱发技术压力。因此,有必要确定可能有助于防止这些有害影响的信息通信技术相关资源。为此,我们采用了混合方法。在研究1中,使用关键事件技术,我们收集了95个人在工作场所使用信息通信技术的积极和消极情况。对这些数据进行内容分析,以定义与处理工作的技术方面相关的资源类别。结果显示,根据关键事件的效价,员工倾向于依赖不同的个人资源。这些发现强调了个人效能感的各种来源的重要性,包括技术素养和非技术知识和技能。在组织层面上,出现了几个类别,包括IT基础设施和技术素养促进方面。研究2采用两波面板调查(N = 335),通过基本心理需求的满足,考察了选定的个人资源和组织资源(分别为ICT自我效能感和技术素养促进)与职业倦怠之间的纵向关系。结果表明,这是一种间接影响,因为两种类型的ICT资源都能积极预测自主性需求满意度,而后者与较低的倦怠风险相关。然而,这种影响似乎主要适用于混合型员工,而不是办公室员工。在此基础上讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信