Incidence and Risk Factors of Post-Lumbar Puncture Headache in Patients With Cognitive Impairment

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Xinhui Wang, Yuchen Qiao, Yuchen Liang, Jinming Han, Hongyan Duan, Yi Tang, Qi Qin
{"title":"Incidence and Risk Factors of Post-Lumbar Puncture Headache in Patients With Cognitive Impairment","authors":"Xinhui Wang,&nbsp;Yuchen Qiao,&nbsp;Yuchen Liang,&nbsp;Jinming Han,&nbsp;Hongyan Duan,&nbsp;Yi Tang,&nbsp;Qi Qin","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cognitive impairment is prevalent among the elderly population. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker tests are employed to facilitate timely and differential diagnosis of cognitive dysfunction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate incidence and risk factors of post-lumbar puncture headache (PLPH) in Chinese geriatric patients with cognitive impairment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 254 consecutive patients with cognitive impairment were recruited between March and September 2023 and categorized into two groups: mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Different scales, such as the short-form of the McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), facial visual analogue scale (F-VAS), revised Wong-Baker Assessment of Facial Expression Pain (FPS-R), and Chinese version of Pain Assessment Scale for Advanced Dementia (C-PAINAD), were used to evaluate the incidence of headache after lumbar puncture. Univariate and multivariate factor analyses were conducted to identify potential risk factors, with the most influential predictors included in regression models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among patients with cognitive disorders, the incidence of PLPH was 24.8%. The incidence and duration of headache did not differ significantly between the MCI and dementia groups. The average time of post-lumbar puncture headache (PLPH) was 22.9 h. There was no significant difference in headache scale scores between MCI patients. The incidence of PLPH in women with cognitive impairment was higher than that in men. The incidence of PLPH in cognitive impairment patients with a history of headache was significantly higher than that in cognitive impairment patients without a history of headache. However, no significant differences were observed in years of education, number of lumbar punctures, length of bed rest, and oral rehydration volume.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>PLPH is more commonly observed in women, individuals with a history of headache, younger age, or lower body mass index (BMI). C-PAINAD and SF-MPQ are the preferred assessment tools for evaluating PLPH in patients with cognitive impairment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70597","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cognitive impairment is prevalent among the elderly population. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker tests are employed to facilitate timely and differential diagnosis of cognitive dysfunction.

Objective

To investigate incidence and risk factors of post-lumbar puncture headache (PLPH) in Chinese geriatric patients with cognitive impairment.

Methods

A total of 254 consecutive patients with cognitive impairment were recruited between March and September 2023 and categorized into two groups: mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Different scales, such as the short-form of the McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), facial visual analogue scale (F-VAS), revised Wong-Baker Assessment of Facial Expression Pain (FPS-R), and Chinese version of Pain Assessment Scale for Advanced Dementia (C-PAINAD), were used to evaluate the incidence of headache after lumbar puncture. Univariate and multivariate factor analyses were conducted to identify potential risk factors, with the most influential predictors included in regression models.

Results

Among patients with cognitive disorders, the incidence of PLPH was 24.8%. The incidence and duration of headache did not differ significantly between the MCI and dementia groups. The average time of post-lumbar puncture headache (PLPH) was 22.9 h. There was no significant difference in headache scale scores between MCI patients. The incidence of PLPH in women with cognitive impairment was higher than that in men. The incidence of PLPH in cognitive impairment patients with a history of headache was significantly higher than that in cognitive impairment patients without a history of headache. However, no significant differences were observed in years of education, number of lumbar punctures, length of bed rest, and oral rehydration volume.

Conclusion

PLPH is more commonly observed in women, individuals with a history of headache, younger age, or lower body mass index (BMI). C-PAINAD and SF-MPQ are the preferred assessment tools for evaluating PLPH in patients with cognitive impairment.

Abstract Image

认知障碍患者腰椎穿刺后头痛的发生率及危险因素分析
背景认知障碍在老年人群中普遍存在。脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物测试用于促进及时和鉴别诊断认知功能障碍。目的探讨中国老年认知功能障碍患者腰椎穿刺后头痛(PLPH)的发生率及危险因素。方法于2023年3月至9月连续招募254例认知障碍患者,将其分为轻度认知障碍(MCI)组和痴呆组。采用McGill疼痛问卷简式(SF-MPQ)、面部视觉模拟量表(F-VAS)、修订后的Wong-Baker面部表情疼痛量表(FPS-R)和中文版晚期痴呆疼痛评定量表(C-PAINAD)评估腰椎穿刺后头痛的发生率。进行单因素和多因素分析,以确定潜在的危险因素,并将影响最大的预测因子纳入回归模型。结果认知障碍患者中PLPH发生率为24.8%。头痛的发生率和持续时间在轻度认知损伤组和痴呆组之间没有显著差异。腰椎穿刺后头痛(PLPH)的平均时间为22.9 h。MCI患者头痛量表评分差异无统计学意义。女性认知障碍患者的PLPH发生率高于男性。有头痛史的认知障碍患者的PLPH发生率明显高于无头痛史的认知障碍患者。然而,在受教育年限、腰椎穿刺次数、卧床休息时间和口服补液量方面没有观察到显著差异。结论PLPH多见于女性、有头痛病史、年龄较小或体重指数(BMI)较低的人群。C-PAINAD和SF-MPQ是评估认知障碍患者PLPH的首选评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain and Behavior
Brain and Behavior BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior. * [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica) * [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology) * [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior) * [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology) * [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development) * [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health) * [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety) * Developmental Neurobiology * [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science) * [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience) * [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior) * [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia) * [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus) * [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping) * [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour) * [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology) * [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging) * [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research) * [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior) * [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system) * [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve) * [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信