{"title":"Disparities in Birth Defect Related Hospitalization Costs and Length of Stay in the US, 2019","authors":"Ruiqi Cen, Anthony Goudie, Wendy N. Nembhard","doi":"10.1002/bdr2.2486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Hospitalization costs for individuals with birth defects exceeded $22 billion in the US in 2019. Understanding hospitalization disparities is critical for resource allocation, and studies on this topic are limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this cross-sectional study, we identified costs and length of stay from the 2019 National Inpatient Sample data, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Disparities were assessed using age, race/ethnicity, regions, expected primary payer, median household income, rurality, and whether the hospitals were public or private.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 912,570 inpatients under 65 years old with birth defect diagnoses, those who were Black (8.3 days), resided in the South (7.6 days), and had Medicaid (8.3 days) as expected primary payer experienced longer average lengths of stay. Inpatients who were White ($10,287 million dollars), lived in the South ($7347 million dollars), and had Medicaid as the expected primary payer ($9760 million dollars) had higher total medical costs. Hispanic inpatients and those of other racial/ethnic groups ($26,145, $26,836), inpatients in the West ($29,244), as well as among those with “other” as the expected primary payer ($36,665) had higher average medical costs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We observed disparities in birth-defect-related inpatients, with variations in medical costs and average length of stay. Health resources may be more effectively allocated to these groups.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9121,"journal":{"name":"Birth Defects Research","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth Defects Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdr2.2486","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Hospitalization costs for individuals with birth defects exceeded $22 billion in the US in 2019. Understanding hospitalization disparities is critical for resource allocation, and studies on this topic are limited.
Methods
In this cross-sectional study, we identified costs and length of stay from the 2019 National Inpatient Sample data, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Disparities were assessed using age, race/ethnicity, regions, expected primary payer, median household income, rurality, and whether the hospitals were public or private.
Results
Among 912,570 inpatients under 65 years old with birth defect diagnoses, those who were Black (8.3 days), resided in the South (7.6 days), and had Medicaid (8.3 days) as expected primary payer experienced longer average lengths of stay. Inpatients who were White ($10,287 million dollars), lived in the South ($7347 million dollars), and had Medicaid as the expected primary payer ($9760 million dollars) had higher total medical costs. Hispanic inpatients and those of other racial/ethnic groups ($26,145, $26,836), inpatients in the West ($29,244), as well as among those with “other” as the expected primary payer ($36,665) had higher average medical costs.
Conclusions
We observed disparities in birth-defect-related inpatients, with variations in medical costs and average length of stay. Health resources may be more effectively allocated to these groups.
期刊介绍:
The journal Birth Defects Research publishes original research and reviews in areas related to the etiology of adverse developmental and reproductive outcome. In particular the journal is devoted to the publication of original scientific research that contributes to the understanding of the biology of embryonic development and the prenatal causative factors and mechanisms leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes, namely structural and functional birth defects, pregnancy loss, postnatal functional defects in the human population, and to the identification of prenatal factors and biological mechanisms that reduce these risks.
Adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes may have genetic, environmental, nutritional or epigenetic causes. Accordingly, the journal Birth Defects Research takes an integrated, multidisciplinary approach in its organization and publication strategy. The journal Birth Defects Research contains separate sections for clinical and molecular teratology, developmental and reproductive toxicology, and reviews in developmental biology to acknowledge and accommodate the integrative nature of research in this field. Each section has a dedicated editor who is a leader in his/her field and who has full editorial authority in his/her area.