Zhihao Zhu, Chen Meng, Li Wang, Jianjun Qu, Lei Wang, Naiping Song, Xing Wang, Zhengcong Yin
{"title":"Grazing Exclusion Modulates Preferential Flow Dynamics Through Root–Soil Architectural Reorganisation in Arid Shrublandsz","authors":"Zhihao Zhu, Chen Meng, Li Wang, Jianjun Qu, Lei Wang, Naiping Song, Xing Wang, Zhengcong Yin","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Preferential flow (PF) critically regulates the water redistribution and ecological functions in arid ecosystems. This study investigated how grazed exclusion alters the root–soil architecture within PF zones and compared the structural differences between preferential and matrix flow (MF) zones. Focusing on <i>Caragana korshinskii</i> shrublands in Yanchi County, China, we employed CT scanning and 3D reconstruction to quantify the geometric patterns and topological characteristics of soil aggregates, macropores and root systems under contrasting management conditions (enclosed vs. grazed). Key findings revealed the following: (1) Enclosed natural grasslands exhibited maximum dye-stained areas (40.38%) and infiltration depths (271 mm); (2) Both grazed artificial and enclosed natural shrublands showed homogenised distributions of aggregates and macropores; (3) Enclosed practices significantly reduced aggregate number (47.2%–65.5%), macropore number (27.0%–30.9%) and root number (39.0%–64.5%) while promoting root thickening (10.7%–43.6% diameter increase, <i>p</i> < 0.05); (4) PF zones contained more aggregates (29.3%–219.1%) and macropore(35.3%–89.9%) than matrix zones (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The results show that moderate grazing can produce more aggregates and macropores, forming a root–soil structure that is more conducive to the PF process. These findings augment our understanding of rhizosphere interactions and sustainable land management practices.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Preferential flow (PF) critically regulates the water redistribution and ecological functions in arid ecosystems. This study investigated how grazed exclusion alters the root–soil architecture within PF zones and compared the structural differences between preferential and matrix flow (MF) zones. Focusing on Caragana korshinskii shrublands in Yanchi County, China, we employed CT scanning and 3D reconstruction to quantify the geometric patterns and topological characteristics of soil aggregates, macropores and root systems under contrasting management conditions (enclosed vs. grazed). Key findings revealed the following: (1) Enclosed natural grasslands exhibited maximum dye-stained areas (40.38%) and infiltration depths (271 mm); (2) Both grazed artificial and enclosed natural shrublands showed homogenised distributions of aggregates and macropores; (3) Enclosed practices significantly reduced aggregate number (47.2%–65.5%), macropore number (27.0%–30.9%) and root number (39.0%–64.5%) while promoting root thickening (10.7%–43.6% diameter increase, p < 0.05); (4) PF zones contained more aggregates (29.3%–219.1%) and macropore(35.3%–89.9%) than matrix zones (p < 0.05). The results show that moderate grazing can produce more aggregates and macropores, forming a root–soil structure that is more conducive to the PF process. These findings augment our understanding of rhizosphere interactions and sustainable land management practices.
期刊介绍:
Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.