Implementation Fidelity of a Virtual Adaptation of the Guiding Good Choices Program

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kristi M. Morrison, Nicole Eisenberg, Vivian H. Lyons, Stacy A. Sterling, Arne Beck, Jordan M. Braciszewski, Dalene Beaulieu, Jennifer Boggs, John S. Briney, Sarah Danzo, Kevin P. Haggerty, Andrew Jessen, Andrea Kline-Simon, Amy M. Loree, Erica Morse, Hannah Scheuer, Xu Wang, Margaret R. Kuklinski
{"title":"Implementation Fidelity of a Virtual Adaptation of the Guiding Good Choices Program","authors":"Kristi M. Morrison,&nbsp;Nicole Eisenberg,&nbsp;Vivian H. Lyons,&nbsp;Stacy A. Sterling,&nbsp;Arne Beck,&nbsp;Jordan M. Braciszewski,&nbsp;Dalene Beaulieu,&nbsp;Jennifer Boggs,&nbsp;John S. Briney,&nbsp;Sarah Danzo,&nbsp;Kevin P. Haggerty,&nbsp;Andrew Jessen,&nbsp;Andrea Kline-Simon,&nbsp;Amy M. Loree,&nbsp;Erica Morse,&nbsp;Hannah Scheuer,&nbsp;Xu Wang,&nbsp;Margaret R. Kuklinski","doi":"10.1002/jcop.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Offering evidence-based parenting interventions to caregivers virtually has the potential to increase the reach and public health impact of interventions. As virtual adaptations to evidence-based interventions increase, attention must be paid to implementation fidelity, as high fidelity is associated with better program outcomes. This study examined implementation fidelity of a virtual adaptation of the family-based Guiding Good Choices program delivered to 292 families in primary care in three large healthcare systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Attendance, dosage, adherence, quality of delivery, and participant engagement were examined quantitatively and qualitatively using interventionist and observer surveys, attendance records, and focus groups with interventionists. Interventionists and observers reported high levels of dosage, adherence, quality of delivery, and participant engagement, but attendance was lower than anticipated. Results suggest that delivering parenting programs virtually in primary care with high fidelity is feasible, but retaining participants may remain challenging in this modality, particularly during a global pandemic.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15496,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community psychology","volume":"53 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcop.70020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Offering evidence-based parenting interventions to caregivers virtually has the potential to increase the reach and public health impact of interventions. As virtual adaptations to evidence-based interventions increase, attention must be paid to implementation fidelity, as high fidelity is associated with better program outcomes. This study examined implementation fidelity of a virtual adaptation of the family-based Guiding Good Choices program delivered to 292 families in primary care in three large healthcare systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Attendance, dosage, adherence, quality of delivery, and participant engagement were examined quantitatively and qualitatively using interventionist and observer surveys, attendance records, and focus groups with interventionists. Interventionists and observers reported high levels of dosage, adherence, quality of delivery, and participant engagement, but attendance was lower than anticipated. Results suggest that delivering parenting programs virtually in primary care with high fidelity is feasible, but retaining participants may remain challenging in this modality, particularly during a global pandemic.

一种虚拟适应的指导性好选择程序的实现保真度
向照顾者提供循证育儿干预措施实际上有可能扩大干预措施的覆盖面和公共卫生影响。随着对基于证据的干预措施的虚拟适应的增加,必须注意实施保真度,因为高保真度与更好的项目结果相关。本研究考察了在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间向三个大型卫生保健系统的292个初级保健家庭提供的基于家庭的指导良好选择计划的虚拟改编实施保真度。通过干预者和观察者调查、出勤记录和干预者焦点小组,对出勤、剂量、依从性、交付质量和参与者参与进行定量和定性检查。干预医师和观察员报告了高水平的剂量、依从性、交付质量和参与者参与,但出席率低于预期。结果表明,在初级保健中以高保真度提供育儿计划是可行的,但在这种模式下,留住参与者可能仍然具有挑战性,特别是在全球大流行期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
195
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Psychology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to research, evaluation, assessment and intervention, and review articles that deal with human behavior in community settings. Articles of interest include descriptions and evaluations of service programs and projects, studies of youth, parenting, and family development, methodology and design for work in the community, the interaction of groups in the larger community, and criminals and corrections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信