Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Sung Uk Bae
{"title":"Robot-Assisted Colectomy for Left-Sided Colon Cancer: Comparison of da Vinci SP and Single-Site Platforms","authors":"Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Sung Uk Bae","doi":"10.1002/rcs.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the clinicopathological and cosmetic outcomes of robotic colectomy using the da Vinci SP and Single-Site for left-sided colon cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 31 and 52 patients who underwent robotic colectomy using the SP and Single-Site, respectively, between July 2011 and July 2023. The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ) was used to assess cosmetic outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent colectomy using the SP had a shorter wound length, less bleeding, and fewer port usages compared with those who underwent colectomy using the Single-Site. The SP group required fewer analgesics on post-operative day 2, showed a shorter time to flatulence, sip water and soft diet, and a shorter hospital stay. Total PSAQ scores for the SP group were superior to those of the Single-Site group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Robotic colectomy for left-sided colon cancer using the SP presents better short-term recovery, requires fewer analgesics and has better cosmetic outcomes than Single-Site.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/rcs.70079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcs.70079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
To compare the clinicopathological and cosmetic outcomes of robotic colectomy using the da Vinci SP and Single-Site for left-sided colon cancer.
Methods
The study included 31 and 52 patients who underwent robotic colectomy using the SP and Single-Site, respectively, between July 2011 and July 2023. The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ) was used to assess cosmetic outcomes.
Results
Patients who underwent colectomy using the SP had a shorter wound length, less bleeding, and fewer port usages compared with those who underwent colectomy using the Single-Site. The SP group required fewer analgesics on post-operative day 2, showed a shorter time to flatulence, sip water and soft diet, and a shorter hospital stay. Total PSAQ scores for the SP group were superior to those of the Single-Site group.
Conclusions
Robotic colectomy for left-sided colon cancer using the SP presents better short-term recovery, requires fewer analgesics and has better cosmetic outcomes than Single-Site.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery provides a cross-disciplinary platform for presenting the latest developments in robotics and computer assisted technologies for medical applications. The journal publishes cutting-edge papers and expert reviews, complemented by commentaries, correspondence and conference highlights that stimulate discussion and exchange of ideas. Areas of interest include robotic surgery aids and systems, operative planning tools, medical imaging and visualisation, simulation and navigation, virtual reality, intuitive command and control systems, haptics and sensor technologies. In addition to research and surgical planning studies, the journal welcomes papers detailing clinical trials and applications of computer-assisted workflows and robotic systems in neurosurgery, urology, paediatric, orthopaedic, craniofacial, cardiovascular, thoraco-abdominal, musculoskeletal and visceral surgery. Articles providing critical analysis of clinical trials, assessment of the benefits and risks of the application of these technologies, commenting on ease of use, or addressing surgical education and training issues are also encouraged. The journal aims to foster a community that encompasses medical practitioners, researchers, and engineers and computer scientists developing robotic systems and computational tools in academic and commercial environments, with the intention of promoting and developing these exciting areas of medical technology.