The Gastroepiploic Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer in the Treatment of Male Genital Lymphedema: A Report of Three Cases

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Microsurgery Pub Date : 2025-05-29 DOI:10.1002/micr.70072
Marco Morelli Coppola, Wladyslaw Gawel, Rossella Elia, Emilie Uldry, Marie Nicod Lalonde, Michele Maruccia, Pietro Giovanni di Summa
{"title":"The Gastroepiploic Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer in the Treatment of Male Genital Lymphedema: A Report of Three Cases","authors":"Marco Morelli Coppola,&nbsp;Wladyslaw Gawel,&nbsp;Rossella Elia,&nbsp;Emilie Uldry,&nbsp;Marie Nicod Lalonde,&nbsp;Michele Maruccia,&nbsp;Pietro Giovanni di Summa","doi":"10.1002/micr.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Male genital lymphedema (MGL) is a debilitating condition that may require surgical intervention. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) can be ineffective in primary and advanced cases because of lymphatic disruption, whereas vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) can overcome this limitation by promoting neolymphangiogenesis but traditionally carries some risk of donor site complications. Gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node transfer (GEVLNT) has recently emerged as an effective treatment option for upper and lower limb lymphedema, with negligible complications. However, its role in genital lymphedema remains unexplored. This is the first short series reporting the use of GEVLNT in MGL. Three male patients (44, 61, and 52 years old) with GL underwent GEVLNT. The first patient had idiopathic disease, which relapsed after previous treatment with LVA; the other two had secondary lymphedema due to cancer treatment and hydrocele surgery, respectively. In all patients, the right gastroepiploic lymphosome was harvested laparoscopically, with flap sizes of 14 × 5 cm, 15 × 4 cm, and 12 × 4 cm, respectively. The recipient vessels were the deep inferior epigastric artery and vein in the first case, and the superficial external pudendal vessels in the other two. Post-operative courses were uneventful for all patients, with no complications reported. Follow-up periods were 36, 23, and 12 months, respectively. In all cases, GEVLNT resulted in significant clinical improvements and reductions in genital lymphedema severity (GLS) scores (7–1, 9–4, and 8–4). Our preliminary experience suggests that GEVLNT could be a viable and effective option for treating male genital lymphedema with minimal donor site morbidity and stable results over time. However, further research with larger patient cohorts, comparative studies, and long-term follow-up is needed to fully establish its efficacy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"45 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.70072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Male genital lymphedema (MGL) is a debilitating condition that may require surgical intervention. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) can be ineffective in primary and advanced cases because of lymphatic disruption, whereas vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) can overcome this limitation by promoting neolymphangiogenesis but traditionally carries some risk of donor site complications. Gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node transfer (GEVLNT) has recently emerged as an effective treatment option for upper and lower limb lymphedema, with negligible complications. However, its role in genital lymphedema remains unexplored. This is the first short series reporting the use of GEVLNT in MGL. Three male patients (44, 61, and 52 years old) with GL underwent GEVLNT. The first patient had idiopathic disease, which relapsed after previous treatment with LVA; the other two had secondary lymphedema due to cancer treatment and hydrocele surgery, respectively. In all patients, the right gastroepiploic lymphosome was harvested laparoscopically, with flap sizes of 14 × 5 cm, 15 × 4 cm, and 12 × 4 cm, respectively. The recipient vessels were the deep inferior epigastric artery and vein in the first case, and the superficial external pudendal vessels in the other two. Post-operative courses were uneventful for all patients, with no complications reported. Follow-up periods were 36, 23, and 12 months, respectively. In all cases, GEVLNT resulted in significant clinical improvements and reductions in genital lymphedema severity (GLS) scores (7–1, 9–4, and 8–4). Our preliminary experience suggests that GEVLNT could be a viable and effective option for treating male genital lymphedema with minimal donor site morbidity and stable results over time. However, further research with larger patient cohorts, comparative studies, and long-term follow-up is needed to fully establish its efficacy.

胃大网膜血管化淋巴结转移治疗男性生殖器淋巴水肿3例报告
男性生殖器淋巴水肿(MGL)是一种衰弱的状况,可能需要手术干预。由于淋巴破坏,淋巴结吻合(LVA)在原发性和晚期病例中可能无效,而血管化淋巴结转移(VLNT)可以通过促进新淋巴血管生成来克服这一局限性,但传统上有一定的供区并发症风险。胃大网膜血管化淋巴结转移(GEVLNT)最近成为上肢和下肢淋巴水肿的有效治疗选择,并发症可以忽略。然而,它在生殖器淋巴水肿中的作用仍未被探索。这是第一个报告在MGL中使用GEVLNT的简短系列文章。3例男性GL患者(44岁、61岁和52岁)行GEVLNT。1例患者为特发性疾病,既往LVA治疗后复发;另外两人分别因癌症治疗和鞘膜积液手术而继发性淋巴水肿。所有患者均在腹腔镜下切除右侧胃网膜淋巴体,皮瓣大小分别为14 × 5 cm、15 × 4 cm和12 × 4 cm。1例受累血管为腹壁下深动脉和静脉,2例受累血管为阴部外浅血管。所有患者术后过程顺利,无并发症报道。随访期分别为36个月、23个月和12个月。在所有病例中,GEVLNT均显著改善了临床症状,降低了生殖器淋巴水肿严重程度(GLS)评分(7 - 1,9 - 4,8 - 4)。我们的初步经验表明,GEVLNT可能是治疗男性生殖器淋巴水肿的一种可行和有效的选择,供体部位发病率最低,结果稳定。然而,需要进一步的研究,更大的患者队列,比较研究和长期随访,以充分确定其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信