A risk nomogram for assessing complications in patients undergoing surgical procedures for cervical cancer. Does baseline quality of life play a role?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jorge Cea García, Inmaculada Rodríguez Jiménez, Laura Ríos-Pena, M. Carmen Rubio Rodríguez, Francisco Márquez Maraver
{"title":"A risk nomogram for assessing complications in patients undergoing surgical procedures for cervical cancer. Does baseline quality of life play a role?","authors":"Jorge Cea García,&nbsp;Inmaculada Rodríguez Jiménez,&nbsp;Laura Ríos-Pena,&nbsp;M. Carmen Rubio Rodríguez,&nbsp;Francisco Márquez Maraver","doi":"10.1111/jog.16318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Surgery for cervical cancer is a known risk factor for hospital readmission, often due to urological, lymphovascular, or neurological complications. While comorbidities are commonly used to assess surgical risk, patient-reported measures like baseline quality of life (QoL) may also help predict complications. This study aimed to estimate how often surgical complications occur and what factors predict them, with a focus on baseline QoL.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a prospective observational study of 100 cervical cancer patients who had surgery at a tertiary hospital between January 2010 and January 2019. A binary logistic regression model was used to predict surgical complications. Baseline QoL was measured with the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-cervix questionnaire. Data were analyzed using R software.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Surgical complications occurred in 54% of patients, most of them after surgery. There was no significant difference in QoL scores between patients with and without complications (<i>p</i> = 0.753). The prediction model showed good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow <i>p</i> = 0.999), no multicollinearity (variance inflation factor = 1.01), and moderate accuracy (<i>C</i>-index = 0.67). A history of cesarean section and pelvic lymphadenectomy was significant predictors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Surgical complications were common in this group. Cesarean section history and pelvic lymphadenectomy were linked to a higher risk. However, baseline QoL did not predict complications. Further research is needed to test this model in other patient groups.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Surgery for cervical cancer is a known risk factor for hospital readmission, often due to urological, lymphovascular, or neurological complications. While comorbidities are commonly used to assess surgical risk, patient-reported measures like baseline quality of life (QoL) may also help predict complications. This study aimed to estimate how often surgical complications occur and what factors predict them, with a focus on baseline QoL.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study of 100 cervical cancer patients who had surgery at a tertiary hospital between January 2010 and January 2019. A binary logistic regression model was used to predict surgical complications. Baseline QoL was measured with the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-cervix questionnaire. Data were analyzed using R software.

Results

Surgical complications occurred in 54% of patients, most of them after surgery. There was no significant difference in QoL scores between patients with and without complications (p = 0.753). The prediction model showed good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.999), no multicollinearity (variance inflation factor = 1.01), and moderate accuracy (C-index = 0.67). A history of cesarean section and pelvic lymphadenectomy was significant predictors.

Conclusions

Surgical complications were common in this group. Cesarean section history and pelvic lymphadenectomy were linked to a higher risk. However, baseline QoL did not predict complications. Further research is needed to test this model in other patient groups.

评估宫颈癌手术患者并发症的风险线图。基线生活质量起作用吗?
目的宫颈癌手术是已知的再入院危险因素,通常是由于泌尿系统、淋巴血管或神经系统并发症。虽然合并症通常用于评估手术风险,但患者报告的基线生活质量(QoL)等指标也可能有助于预测并发症。本研究旨在评估手术并发症发生的频率以及预测并发症的因素,重点关注基线生活质量。方法对2010年1月至2019年1月在某三级医院接受手术治疗的100例宫颈癌患者进行前瞻性观察研究。采用二元logistic回归模型预测手术并发症。基线生活质量通过功能评估癌症治疗-子宫颈问卷进行测量。数据分析采用R软件。结果手术并发症发生率为54%,以术后并发症居多。有无并发症患者的生活质量评分差异无统计学意义(p = 0.753)。预测模型具有良好的校正性(Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.999),无多重共线性(方差膨胀因子= 1.01),准确度中等(C-index = 0.67)。剖宫产和盆腔淋巴结切除术史是显著的预测因素。结论本组手术并发症发生率较高。剖宫产史和盆腔淋巴结切除术与更高的风险有关。然而,基线生活质量并不能预测并发症。需要进一步的研究来在其他患者群体中测试这一模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
376
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信