Black-Start and Hot-Swap Performance Assessment and Improved Control Strategy for Grid-Forming VSC and CSC-Based PV Systems

IF 3.3 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Md. Mizanur Rahman;Yasser Abdel-Rady I. Mohamed
{"title":"Black-Start and Hot-Swap Performance Assessment and Improved Control Strategy for Grid-Forming VSC and CSC-Based PV Systems","authors":"Md. Mizanur Rahman;Yasser Abdel-Rady I. Mohamed","doi":"10.1109/OJIA.2025.3565826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The grid-forming (GFM) control of voltage-source converter (VSC)-based photovoltaic (PV) systems has shown promise in supporting the grid frequency and inertia. However, the literature lacks GFM control development for current-source converter (CSC)-based PV systems and comparisons with the VSC counterpart. In particular, previous studies did not address dynamic performance assessment and comparison under critical operating conditions, such as black-start (autonomous power system restoration) and hot-swap (the transition between isolated and grid-tied modes). Furthermore, previous research did not address the dc- and ac-side stability differences among VSC- and CSC-based GFM PV systems. This article addresses these research gaps by differentiating the dynamic performance and stability of GFM VSC- and CSC-based PV systems under different operating conditions. Furthermore, this article presents active compensators for both GFM systems to enhance their dynamic performance and stability. Compared to the GFM VSC, the GFM CSC provides a better frequency profile under black-start and hot-swap conditions, improved robustness under grid impedance variation, and inherent fast current limitation under faults. Detailed offline and real-time simulation results validate the comparative analysis and the effectiveness of the proposed active damping methods for both GFM systems.","PeriodicalId":100629,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications","volume":"6 ","pages":"350-365"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10980456","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10980456/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The grid-forming (GFM) control of voltage-source converter (VSC)-based photovoltaic (PV) systems has shown promise in supporting the grid frequency and inertia. However, the literature lacks GFM control development for current-source converter (CSC)-based PV systems and comparisons with the VSC counterpart. In particular, previous studies did not address dynamic performance assessment and comparison under critical operating conditions, such as black-start (autonomous power system restoration) and hot-swap (the transition between isolated and grid-tied modes). Furthermore, previous research did not address the dc- and ac-side stability differences among VSC- and CSC-based GFM PV systems. This article addresses these research gaps by differentiating the dynamic performance and stability of GFM VSC- and CSC-based PV systems under different operating conditions. Furthermore, this article presents active compensators for both GFM systems to enhance their dynamic performance and stability. Compared to the GFM VSC, the GFM CSC provides a better frequency profile under black-start and hot-swap conditions, improved robustness under grid impedance variation, and inherent fast current limitation under faults. Detailed offline and real-time simulation results validate the comparative analysis and the effectiveness of the proposed active damping methods for both GFM systems.
并网VSC和基于csc的光伏系统黑启动和热插拔性能评估及改进控制策略
基于电压源变换器(VSC)的光伏发电系统的并网控制在支持电网频率和惯性方面显示出良好的前景。然而,文献缺乏基于电流源变换器(CSC)的光伏系统的GFM控制开发,以及与VSC对应系统的比较。特别是,以往的研究没有解决关键运行条件下的动态性能评估和比较,例如黑启动(电力系统自主恢复)和热插拔(隔离模式和并网模式之间的转换)。此外,先前的研究并没有解决基于VSC和csc的GFM光伏系统的直流和交流稳定性差异。本文通过区分基于GFM VSC和csc的光伏系统在不同运行条件下的动态性能和稳定性来解决这些研究空白。此外,本文还提出了两种GFM系统的有源补偿器,以提高系统的动态性能和稳定性。与GFM VSC相比,GFM CSC在黑启动和热插拔条件下具有更好的频率分布,在电网阻抗变化下具有更好的鲁棒性,并且在故障情况下具有较快的电流限制。详细的离线和实时仿真结果验证了两种GFM系统主动阻尼方法的对比分析和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信